From a5a1d1c2914b5316924c7893eb683a5420ebd3be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 20:32:01 +0100 Subject: clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is unambiguous. Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script: @rem@ @@ -typedef u64 cycle_t; @fix@ typedef cycle_t; @@ -cycle_t +u64 Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: John Stultz --- drivers/clocksource/jcore-pit.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'drivers/clocksource/jcore-pit.c') diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/jcore-pit.c b/drivers/clocksource/jcore-pit.c index 54e1665aa03c..e90a6cfcb061 100644 --- a/drivers/clocksource/jcore-pit.c +++ b/drivers/clocksource/jcore-pit.c @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ static notrace u64 jcore_sched_clock_read(void) return seclo * NSEC_PER_SEC + nsec; } -static cycle_t jcore_clocksource_read(struct clocksource *cs) +static u64 jcore_clocksource_read(struct clocksource *cs) { return jcore_sched_clock_read(); } -- cgit v1.2.3