From ff13db41f184f8222aca0cb653347ccdd48a057a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Sterba Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 14:30:40 +0100 Subject: btrfs: drop unused parameter from lock_extent_bits We've always passed 0. Stack usage will slightly decrease. Signed-off-by: David Sterba --- fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'fs/btrfs/scrub.c') diff --git a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c index 2907a77fb1f6..23f396a1b2a8 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c @@ -4161,7 +4161,7 @@ static int check_extent_to_block(struct inode *inode, u64 start, u64 len, io_tree = &BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree; - lock_extent_bits(io_tree, lockstart, lockend, 0, &cached_state); + lock_extent_bits(io_tree, lockstart, lockend, &cached_state); ordered = btrfs_lookup_ordered_range(inode, lockstart, len); if (ordered) { btrfs_put_ordered_extent(ordered); -- cgit v1.2.3