From d2cbf2a260ab18c833f07fda66e30c4d4344162e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 13:07:58 +0800
Subject: Btrfs: do not increment on bio_index one by one

'bio_index' is just a index, it's really not necessary to do increment
one by one.

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/file-item.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'fs/btrfs')

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file-item.c b/fs/btrfs/file-item.c
index 127555b29f58..67751b776c7b 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/file-item.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/file-item.c
@@ -281,10 +281,10 @@ static int __btrfs_lookup_bio_sums(struct btrfs_root *root,
 found:
 		csum += count * csum_size;
 		nblocks -= count;
+		bio_index += count;
 		while (count--) {
 			disk_bytenr += bvec->bv_len;
 			offset += bvec->bv_len;
-			bio_index++;
 			bvec++;
 		}
 	}
-- 
cgit v1.2.3