From b8559dc242d1d47dcf99660a4d6afded727e0cc0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chao Yu Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 19:28:29 +0800 Subject: f2fs: split free nid list During free nid allocation, in order to do preallocation, we will tag free nid entry as allocated one and still leave it in free nid list, for other allocators who want to grab free nids, it needs to traverse the free nid list for lookup. It becomes overhead in scenario of allocating free nid intensively by multithreads. This patch splits free nid list to two list: {free,alloc}_nid_list, to keep free nids and preallocated free nids separately, after that, traverse latency will be gone, besides split nid_cnt for separate statistic. Additionally, introduce __insert_nid_to_list and __remove_nid_from_list for cleanup. Signed-off-by: Chao Yu [Jaegeuk Kim: modify f2fs_bug_on to avoid needless branches] Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim --- fs/f2fs/node.h | 11 ++++++----- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/f2fs/node.h') diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.h b/fs/f2fs/node.h index cfdcf98516a1..e7997e240366 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/node.h +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.h @@ -169,14 +169,15 @@ static inline void next_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t *nid) struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i = NM_I(sbi); struct free_nid *fnid; - spin_lock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock); - if (nm_i->fcnt <= 0) { - spin_unlock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock); + spin_lock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock); + if (nm_i->nid_cnt[FREE_NID_LIST] <= 0) { + spin_unlock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock); return; } - fnid = list_entry(nm_i->free_nid_list.next, struct free_nid, list); + fnid = list_entry(nm_i->nid_list[FREE_NID_LIST].next, + struct free_nid, list); *nid = fnid->nid; - spin_unlock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock); + spin_unlock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock); } /* -- cgit v1.2.3