From f4db7182e0de981a3f1b356e0cf43c6815423055 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pavel Begunkov Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 18:20:54 +0300 Subject: io-wq: return next work from ->do_work() directly It's easier to return next work from ->do_work() than having an in-out argument. Looks nicer and easier to compile. Also, merge io_wq_assign_next() into its only user. Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe --- fs/io-wq.c | 8 +++----- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/io-wq.c') diff --git a/fs/io-wq.c b/fs/io-wq.c index 47c5f3aeb460..72f759e1d6eb 100644 --- a/fs/io-wq.c +++ b/fs/io-wq.c @@ -523,9 +523,8 @@ get_next: work->flags |= IO_WQ_WORK_CANCEL; hash = io_get_work_hash(work); - linked = old_work = work; - wq->do_work(&linked); - linked = (old_work == linked) ? NULL : linked; + old_work = work; + linked = wq->do_work(work); work = next_hashed; if (!work && linked && !io_wq_is_hashed(linked)) { @@ -781,8 +780,7 @@ static void io_run_cancel(struct io_wq_work *work, struct io_wqe *wqe) struct io_wq_work *old_work = work; work->flags |= IO_WQ_WORK_CANCEL; - wq->do_work(&work); - work = (work == old_work) ? NULL : work; + work = wq->do_work(work); wq->free_work(old_work); } while (work); } -- cgit v1.2.3