From baab81fa518ecfac597402b462631f5593926623 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andi Kleen Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 16:58:51 -0600 Subject: BKL-removal: Use unlocked_ioctl for jfs Convert jfs_ioctl over to not use the BKL. The only potential race I could see was with two ioctls in parallel changing the flags and losing the updates. Use the i_mutex to protect against this. Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp --- fs/jfs/file.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'fs/jfs/file.c') diff --git a/fs/jfs/file.c b/fs/jfs/file.c index 87eb93694af7..713ff4c2f807 100644 --- a/fs/jfs/file.c +++ b/fs/jfs/file.c @@ -112,5 +112,5 @@ const struct file_operations jfs_file_operations = { .splice_write = generic_file_splice_write, .fsync = jfs_fsync, .release = jfs_release, - .ioctl = jfs_ioctl, + .unlocked_ioctl = jfs_ioctl, }; -- cgit v1.2.3