From 901796afca0d31d97bf6d1bf2ab251a93a4b8c83 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christoph Hellwig Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:52:49 +0000 Subject: xfs: clean up xfs_ioerror_alert Instead of passing the block number and mount structure explicitly get them off the bp and fix make the argument order more natural. Also move it to xfs_buf.c and stop printing the device name given that we already get the fs name as part of xfs_alert, and we know what device is operates on because of the caller that gets printed, finally rename it to xfs_buf_ioerror_alert and pass __func__ as argument where it makes sense. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner Signed-off-by: Alex Elder --- fs/xfs/xfs_rw.c | 20 +------------------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 19 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/xfs/xfs_rw.c') diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_rw.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_rw.c index 86f1928b4cfa..597d044a09a1 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_rw.c +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_rw.c @@ -91,24 +91,6 @@ xfs_do_force_shutdown( } } -/* - * Prints out an ALERT message about I/O error. - */ -void -xfs_ioerror_alert( - char *func, - struct xfs_mount *mp, - xfs_buf_t *bp, - xfs_daddr_t blkno) -{ - xfs_alert(mp, - "I/O error occurred: meta-data dev %s block 0x%llx" - " (\"%s\") error %d buf count %zd", - xfs_buf_target_name(bp->b_target), - (__uint64_t)blkno, func, - bp->b_error, XFS_BUF_COUNT(bp)); -} - /* * This isn't an absolute requirement, but it is * just a good idea to call xfs_read_buf instead of @@ -143,7 +125,7 @@ xfs_read_buf( } else { *bpp = NULL; if (error) { - xfs_ioerror_alert("xfs_read_buf", mp, bp, XFS_BUF_ADDR(bp)); + xfs_buf_ioerror_alert(bp, __func__); } else { error = XFS_ERROR(EIO); } -- cgit v1.2.3