From 6909e0f322b0527fee9fdc54685e6cad69008713 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2023 21:06:04 +0100 Subject: ACPI: utils: Return bool from acpi_evaluate_reference() There are only 4 users of acpi_evaluate_reference() and none of them actually cares about the reason why it fails. All of them are only interested in whether or not it is successful, so it can return a bool value indicating that. Modify acpi_evaluate_reference() as per the observation above and update its callers accordingly so as to get rid of useless code and local variables. The observable behavior of the kernel is not expected to change after this modification of the code. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 8 +++----- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'include/acpi') diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h index aae31552c574..fbe60af56b34 100644 --- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h @@ -25,11 +25,9 @@ acpi_status acpi_evaluate_integer(acpi_handle handle, acpi_string pathname, struct acpi_object_list *arguments, unsigned long long *data); -acpi_status -acpi_evaluate_reference(acpi_handle handle, - acpi_string pathname, - struct acpi_object_list *arguments, - struct acpi_handle_list *list); +bool acpi_evaluate_reference(acpi_handle handle, acpi_string pathname, + struct acpi_object_list *arguments, + struct acpi_handle_list *list); bool acpi_handle_list_equal(struct acpi_handle_list *list1, struct acpi_handle_list *list2); void acpi_handle_list_replace(struct acpi_handle_list *dst, -- cgit v1.2.3