From 3a2daa7248647c0e5e165140553f9af5006e93a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pu Lehui Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 14:41:16 +0800 Subject: bpf: Make some symbols static The sparse tool complains as follows: kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4567:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_sys_bpf_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4592:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_sys_close_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? This symbol is not used outside of syscall.c, so marks it static. Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: Song Liu Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210519064116.240536-1-pulehui@huawei.com --- kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel/bpf') diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 0f1ce2171f1e..1d1cd80a6e67 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -4563,7 +4563,7 @@ BPF_CALL_3(bpf_sys_bpf, int, cmd, void *, attr, u32, attr_size) return __sys_bpf(cmd, KERNEL_BPFPTR(attr), attr_size); } -const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sys_bpf_proto = { +static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sys_bpf_proto = { .func = bpf_sys_bpf, .gpl_only = false, .ret_type = RET_INTEGER, @@ -4588,7 +4588,7 @@ BPF_CALL_1(bpf_sys_close, u32, fd) return close_fd(fd); } -const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sys_close_proto = { +static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sys_close_proto = { .func = bpf_sys_close, .gpl_only = false, .ret_type = RET_INTEGER, -- cgit v1.2.3