From 746cf3459f118592a72ef42e7551777ff17b1684 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Wei Yang Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 10:06:09 +0800 Subject: tracing: Simplify defining of the next event id The value to be used and compared in trace_search_list() is "last + 1". Let's just define next to be "last + 1" instead of doing the addition each time. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200703020612.12930-2-richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com Signed-off-by: Wei Yang Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) --- kernel/trace/trace_output.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel/trace') diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_output.c b/kernel/trace/trace_output.c index 73976de7f8cc..a35232d61601 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/trace_output.c +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_output.c @@ -675,11 +675,11 @@ static LIST_HEAD(ftrace_event_list); static int trace_search_list(struct list_head **list) { struct trace_event *e; - int last = __TRACE_LAST_TYPE; + int next = __TRACE_LAST_TYPE + 1; if (list_empty(&ftrace_event_list)) { *list = &ftrace_event_list; - return last + 1; + return next; } /* @@ -687,17 +687,17 @@ static int trace_search_list(struct list_head **list) * lets see if somebody freed one. */ list_for_each_entry(e, &ftrace_event_list, list) { - if (e->type != last + 1) + if (e->type != next) break; - last++; + next++; } /* Did we used up all 65 thousand events??? */ - if ((last + 1) > TRACE_EVENT_TYPE_MAX) + if (next > TRACE_EVENT_TYPE_MAX) return 0; *list = &e->list; - return last + 1; + return next; } void trace_event_read_lock(void) -- cgit v1.2.3