openssl: bump to 1.1.1u

Major changes between OpenSSL 1.1.1t and OpenSSL 1.1.1u [30 May 2023]

    o Mitigate for very slow `OBJ_obj2txt()` performance with gigantic
      OBJECT IDENTIFIER sub-identities.  (CVE-2023-2650)
    o Fixed documentation of X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() (CVE-2023-0466)
    o Fixed handling of invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates
      (CVE-2023-0465)
    o Limited the number of nodes created in a policy tree ([CVE-2023-0464])

Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
(cherry picked from commit afb442270211c00282cecf323d568aa88391a32c)

3 files changed, 3 insertions, 265 deletions

diff --git a/package/libs/openssl/Makefile b/package/libs/openssl/Makefile
index f72ba844e7..3535859bf4 100644
--- a/package/libs/openssl/Makefile
+++ b/package/libs/openssl/Makefile
@@ -9,9 +9,9 @@ include $(TOPDIR)/rules.mk
 
 PKG_NAME:=openssl
 PKG_BASE:=1.1.1
-PKG_BUGFIX:=t
+PKG_BUGFIX:=u
 PKG_VERSION:=$(PKG_BASE)$(PKG_BUGFIX)
-PKG_RELEASE:=2
+PKG_RELEASE:=1
 PKG_USE_MIPS16:=0
 ENGINES_DIR=engines-1.1
 
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ PKG_SOURCE_URL:= \
 	ftp://ftp.pca.dfn.de/pub/tools/net/openssl/source/ \
 	ftp://ftp.pca.dfn.de/pub/tools/net/openssl/source/old/$(PKG_BASE)/
 
-PKG_HASH:=8dee9b24bdb1dcbf0c3d1e9b02fb8f6bf22165e807f45adeb7c9677536859d3b
+PKG_HASH:=e2f8d84b523eecd06c7be7626830370300fbcc15386bf5142d72758f6963ebc6
 
 PKG_LICENSE:=OpenSSL
 PKG_LICENSE_FILES:=LICENSE
diff --git a/package/libs/openssl/patches/200-x509-excessive-resource-use-verifying-policy-constra.patch b/package/libs/openssl/patches/200-x509-excessive-resource-use-verifying-policy-constra.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index a3a4de6008..0000000000
--- a/package/libs/openssl/patches/200-x509-excessive-resource-use-verifying-policy-constra.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,214 +0,0 @@
-From 879f7080d7e141f415c79eaa3a8ac4a3dad0348b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Pauli <pauli@openssl.org>
-Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 15:28:20 +1100
-Subject: [PATCH] x509: excessive resource use verifying policy constraints
-
-A security vulnerability has been identified in all supported versions
-of OpenSSL related to the verification of X.509 certificate chains
-that include policy constraints.  Attackers may be able to exploit this
-vulnerability by creating a malicious certificate chain that triggers
-exponential use of computational resources, leading to a denial-of-service
-(DoS) attack on affected systems.
-
-Fixes CVE-2023-0464
-
-Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
-Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
-(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20569)
-
-diff --git a/crypto/x509v3/pcy_local.h b/crypto/x509v3/pcy_local.h
-index 5daf78de45..344aa06765 100644
---- a/crypto/x509v3/pcy_local.h
-+++ b/crypto/x509v3/pcy_local.h
-@@ -111,6 +111,11 @@ struct X509_POLICY_LEVEL_st {
- };
- 
- struct X509_POLICY_TREE_st {
-+    /* The number of nodes in the tree */
-+    size_t node_count;
-+    /* The maximum number of nodes in the tree */
-+    size_t node_maximum;
-+
-     /* This is the tree 'level' data */
-     X509_POLICY_LEVEL *levels;
-     int nlevel;
-@@ -159,7 +164,8 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *tree_find_sk(STACK_OF(X509_POLICY_NODE) *sk,
- X509_POLICY_NODE *level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level,
-                                  X509_POLICY_DATA *data,
-                                  X509_POLICY_NODE *parent,
--                                 X509_POLICY_TREE *tree);
-+                                 X509_POLICY_TREE *tree,
-+                                 int extra_data);
- void policy_node_free(X509_POLICY_NODE *node);
- int policy_node_match(const X509_POLICY_LEVEL *lvl,
-                       const X509_POLICY_NODE *node, const ASN1_OBJECT *oid);
-diff --git a/crypto/x509v3/pcy_node.c b/crypto/x509v3/pcy_node.c
-index e2d7b15322..d574fb9d66 100644
---- a/crypto/x509v3/pcy_node.c
-+++ b/crypto/x509v3/pcy_node.c
-@@ -59,10 +59,15 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *level_find_node(const X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level,
- X509_POLICY_NODE *level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level,
-                                  X509_POLICY_DATA *data,
-                                  X509_POLICY_NODE *parent,
--                                 X509_POLICY_TREE *tree)
-+                                 X509_POLICY_TREE *tree,
-+                                 int extra_data)
- {
-     X509_POLICY_NODE *node;
- 
-+    /* Verify that the tree isn't too large.  This mitigates CVE-2023-0464 */
-+    if (tree->node_maximum > 0 && tree->node_count >= tree->node_maximum)
-+        return NULL;
-+
-     node = OPENSSL_zalloc(sizeof(*node));
-     if (node == NULL) {
-         X509V3err(X509V3_F_LEVEL_ADD_NODE, ERR_R_MALLOC_FAILURE);
-@@ -70,7 +75,7 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level,
-     }
-     node->data = data;
-     node->parent = parent;
--    if (level) {
-+    if (level != NULL) {
-         if (OBJ_obj2nid(data->valid_policy) == NID_any_policy) {
-             if (level->anyPolicy)
-                 goto node_error;
-@@ -90,7 +95,7 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level,
-         }
-     }
- 
--    if (tree) {
-+    if (extra_data) {
-         if (tree->extra_data == NULL)
-             tree->extra_data = sk_X509_POLICY_DATA_new_null();
-         if (tree->extra_data == NULL){
-@@ -103,6 +108,7 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level,
-         }
-     }
- 
-+    tree->node_count++;
-     if (parent)
-         parent->nchild++;
- 
-diff --git a/crypto/x509v3/pcy_tree.c b/crypto/x509v3/pcy_tree.c
-index 6e8322cbc5..6c7fd35405 100644
---- a/crypto/x509v3/pcy_tree.c
-+++ b/crypto/x509v3/pcy_tree.c
-@@ -13,6 +13,18 @@
- 
- #include "pcy_local.h"
- 
-+/*
-+ * If the maximum number of nodes in the policy tree isn't defined, set it to
-+ * a generous default of 1000 nodes.
-+ *
-+ * Defining this to be zero means unlimited policy tree growth which opens the
-+ * door on CVE-2023-0464.
-+ */
-+
-+#ifndef OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX
-+# define OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX 1000
-+#endif
-+
- /*
-  * Enable this to print out the complete policy tree at various point during
-  * evaluation.
-@@ -168,6 +180,9 @@ static int tree_init(X509_POLICY_TREE **ptree, STACK_OF(X509) *certs,
-         return X509_PCY_TREE_INTERNAL;
-     }
- 
-+    /* Limit the growth of the tree to mitigate CVE-2023-0464 */
-+    tree->node_maximum = OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX;
-+
-     /*
-      * http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5280#section-6.1.2, figure 3.
-      *
-@@ -184,7 +199,7 @@ static int tree_init(X509_POLICY_TREE **ptree, STACK_OF(X509) *certs,
-     level = tree->levels;
-     if ((data = policy_data_new(NULL, OBJ_nid2obj(NID_any_policy), 0)) == NULL)
-         goto bad_tree;
--    if (level_add_node(level, data, NULL, tree) == NULL) {
-+    if (level_add_node(level, data, NULL, tree, 1) == NULL) {
-         policy_data_free(data);
-         goto bad_tree;
-     }
-@@ -243,7 +258,8 @@ static int tree_init(X509_POLICY_TREE **ptree, STACK_OF(X509) *certs,
-  * Return value: 1 on success, 0 otherwise
-  */
- static int tree_link_matching_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr,
--                                    X509_POLICY_DATA *data)
-+                                    X509_POLICY_DATA *data,
-+                                    X509_POLICY_TREE *tree)
- {
-     X509_POLICY_LEVEL *last = curr - 1;
-     int i, matched = 0;
-@@ -253,13 +269,13 @@ static int tree_link_matching_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr,
-         X509_POLICY_NODE *node = sk_X509_POLICY_NODE_value(last->nodes, i);
- 
-         if (policy_node_match(last, node, data->valid_policy)) {
--            if (level_add_node(curr, data, node, NULL) == NULL)
-+            if (level_add_node(curr, data, node, tree, 0) == NULL)
-                 return 0;
-             matched = 1;
-         }
-     }
-     if (!matched && last->anyPolicy) {
--        if (level_add_node(curr, data, last->anyPolicy, NULL) == NULL)
-+        if (level_add_node(curr, data, last->anyPolicy, tree, 0) == NULL)
-             return 0;
-     }
-     return 1;
-@@ -272,7 +288,8 @@ static int tree_link_matching_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr,
-  * Return value: 1 on success, 0 otherwise.
-  */
- static int tree_link_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr,
--                           const X509_POLICY_CACHE *cache)
-+                           const X509_POLICY_CACHE *cache,
-+                           X509_POLICY_TREE *tree)
- {
-     int i;
- 
-@@ -280,7 +297,7 @@ static int tree_link_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr,
-         X509_POLICY_DATA *data = sk_X509_POLICY_DATA_value(cache->data, i);
- 
-         /* Look for matching nodes in previous level */
--        if (!tree_link_matching_nodes(curr, data))
-+        if (!tree_link_matching_nodes(curr, data, tree))
-             return 0;
-     }
-     return 1;
-@@ -311,7 +328,7 @@ static int tree_add_unmatched(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr,
-     /* Curr may not have anyPolicy */
-     data->qualifier_set = cache->anyPolicy->qualifier_set;
-     data->flags |= POLICY_DATA_FLAG_SHARED_QUALIFIERS;
--    if (level_add_node(curr, data, node, tree) == NULL) {
-+    if (level_add_node(curr, data, node, tree, 1) == NULL) {
-         policy_data_free(data);
-         return 0;
-     }
-@@ -373,7 +390,7 @@ static int tree_link_any(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr,
-     }
-     /* Finally add link to anyPolicy */
-     if (last->anyPolicy &&
--        level_add_node(curr, cache->anyPolicy, last->anyPolicy, NULL) == NULL)
-+        level_add_node(curr, cache->anyPolicy, last->anyPolicy, tree, 0) == NULL)
-         return 0;
-     return 1;
- }
-@@ -555,7 +572,7 @@ static int tree_calculate_user_set(X509_POLICY_TREE *tree,
-             extra->qualifier_set = anyPolicy->data->qualifier_set;
-             extra->flags = POLICY_DATA_FLAG_SHARED_QUALIFIERS
-                 | POLICY_DATA_FLAG_EXTRA_NODE;
--            node = level_add_node(NULL, extra, anyPolicy->parent, tree);
-+            node = level_add_node(NULL, extra, anyPolicy->parent, tree, 1);
-         }
-         if (!tree->user_policies) {
-             tree->user_policies = sk_X509_POLICY_NODE_new_null();
-@@ -582,7 +599,7 @@ static int tree_evaluate(X509_POLICY_TREE *tree)
- 
-     for (i = 1; i < tree->nlevel; i++, curr++) {
-         cache = policy_cache_set(curr->cert);
--        if (!tree_link_nodes(curr, cache))
-+        if (!tree_link_nodes(curr, cache, tree))
-             return X509_PCY_TREE_INTERNAL;
- 
-         if (!(curr->flags & X509_V_FLAG_INHIBIT_ANY)
diff --git a/package/libs/openssl/patches/210-Ensure-that-EXFLAG_INVALID_POLICY-is-checked-even-in.patch b/package/libs/openssl/patches/210-Ensure-that-EXFLAG_INVALID_POLICY-is-checked-even-in.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index ffb7317d7c..0000000000
--- a/package/libs/openssl/patches/210-Ensure-that-EXFLAG_INVALID_POLICY-is-checked-even-in.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,48 +0,0 @@
-From b013765abfa80036dc779dd0e50602c57bb3bf95 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
-Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2023 16:52:55 +0000
-Subject: [PATCH] Ensure that EXFLAG_INVALID_POLICY is checked even in leaf
- certs
-
-Even though we check the leaf cert to confirm it is valid, we
-later ignored the invalid flag and did not notice that the leaf
-cert was bad.
-
-Fixes: CVE-2023-0465
-
-Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
-Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
-(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20588)
-
-diff --git a/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c b/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c
-index 925fbb5412..1dfe4f9f31 100644
---- a/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c
-+++ b/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c
-@@ -1649,18 +1649,25 @@ static int check_policy(X509_STORE_CTX *ctx)
-     }
-     /* Invalid or inconsistent extensions */
-     if (ret == X509_PCY_TREE_INVALID) {
--        int i;
-+        int i, cbcalled = 0;
- 
-         /* Locate certificates with bad extensions and notify callback. */
--        for (i = 1; i < sk_X509_num(ctx->chain); i++) {
-+        for (i = 0; i < sk_X509_num(ctx->chain); i++) {
-             X509 *x = sk_X509_value(ctx->chain, i);
- 
-             if (!(x->ex_flags & EXFLAG_INVALID_POLICY))
-                 continue;
-+            cbcalled = 1;
-             if (!verify_cb_cert(ctx, x, i,
-                                 X509_V_ERR_INVALID_POLICY_EXTENSION))
-                 return 0;
-         }
-+        if (!cbcalled) {
-+            /* Should not be able to get here */
-+            X509err(X509_F_CHECK_POLICY, ERR_R_INTERNAL_ERROR);
-+            return 0;
-+        }
-+        /* The callback ignored the error so we return success */
-         return 1;
-     }
-     if (ret == X509_PCY_TREE_FAILURE) {