summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/target/linux/brcm2708/patches-4.4/0094-drm-vc4-Use-job_lock-to-protect-seqno_cb_list.patch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'target/linux/brcm2708/patches-4.4/0094-drm-vc4-Use-job_lock-to-protect-seqno_cb_list.patch')
-rw-r--r--target/linux/brcm2708/patches-4.4/0094-drm-vc4-Use-job_lock-to-protect-seqno_cb_list.patch54
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 54 deletions
diff --git a/target/linux/brcm2708/patches-4.4/0094-drm-vc4-Use-job_lock-to-protect-seqno_cb_list.patch b/target/linux/brcm2708/patches-4.4/0094-drm-vc4-Use-job_lock-to-protect-seqno_cb_list.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index d9d1048a92..0000000000
--- a/target/linux/brcm2708/patches-4.4/0094-drm-vc4-Use-job_lock-to-protect-seqno_cb_list.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,54 +0,0 @@
-From cfa018eec8227589076e45fd65f654e525349ff5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
-Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 08:32:24 -0700
-Subject: [PATCH] drm/vc4: Use job_lock to protect seqno_cb_list.
-
-We're (mostly) not supposed to be using struct_mutex in drivers these
-days.
-
-Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
----
- drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_gem.c | 8 +++++---
- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
-
---- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_gem.c
-+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_gem.c
-@@ -474,7 +474,6 @@ vc4_job_handle_completed(struct vc4_dev
- vc4_complete_exec(exec);
- spin_lock_irqsave(&vc4->job_lock, irqflags);
- }
-- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vc4->job_lock, irqflags);
-
- list_for_each_entry_safe(cb, cb_temp, &vc4->seqno_cb_list, work.entry) {
- if (cb->seqno <= vc4->finished_seqno) {
-@@ -482,6 +481,8 @@ vc4_job_handle_completed(struct vc4_dev
- schedule_work(&cb->work);
- }
- }
-+
-+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vc4->job_lock, irqflags);
- }
-
- static void vc4_seqno_cb_work(struct work_struct *work)
-@@ -496,18 +497,19 @@ int vc4_queue_seqno_cb(struct drm_device
- {
- struct vc4_dev *vc4 = to_vc4_dev(dev);
- int ret = 0;
-+ unsigned long irqflags;
-
- cb->func = func;
- INIT_WORK(&cb->work, vc4_seqno_cb_work);
-
-- mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
-+ spin_lock_irqsave(&vc4->job_lock, irqflags);
- if (seqno > vc4->finished_seqno) {
- cb->seqno = seqno;
- list_add_tail(&cb->work.entry, &vc4->seqno_cb_list);
- } else {
- schedule_work(&cb->work);
- }
-- mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
-+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vc4->job_lock, irqflags);
-
- return ret;
- }