summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/target/linux/brcm2708/patches-4.4/0540-drm-vc4-Use-drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked.patch
blob: f3ff1c530cadb6bbbb8dfb18f807d9a315af0680 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
From 26b1bf12a8ed92c1f97b3da7919056c888e1e49d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 19:53:06 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] drm/vc4: Use drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked

Since my last struct_mutex crusade someone escaped!

This already has the advantage that for the common case when someone
else holds a ref the unref won't even acquire dev->struct_mutex. And
I'm working on code to allow drivers to completely opt-out of any and
all dev->struct_mutex usage, but that only works if they use the
_unlocked variants everywhere.

v2: Drop comment too.

v3: Drop the other comment too.

Cc: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1464630800-30786-15-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
(cherry picked from commit db3697295cf4da1356e3ec86761d464d6d013b48)
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_bo.c  |  2 --
 drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_gem.c | 11 +++--------
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_bo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_bo.c
@@ -311,8 +311,6 @@ static void vc4_bo_cache_free_old(struct
 
 /* Called on the last userspace/kernel unreference of the BO.  Returns
  * it to the BO cache if possible, otherwise frees it.
- *
- * Note that this is called with the struct_mutex held.
  */
 void vc4_free_object(struct drm_gem_object *gem_bo)
 {
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_gem.c
@@ -67,10 +67,8 @@ vc4_free_hang_state(struct drm_device *d
 {
 	unsigned int i;
 
-	mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
 	for (i = 0; i < state->user_state.bo_count; i++)
-		drm_gem_object_unreference(state->bo[i]);
-	mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
+		drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked(state->bo[i]);
 
 	kfree(state);
 }
@@ -711,11 +709,9 @@ vc4_complete_exec(struct drm_device *dev
 	struct vc4_dev *vc4 = to_vc4_dev(dev);
 	unsigned i;
 
-	/* Need the struct lock for drm_gem_object_unreference(). */
-	mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
 	if (exec->bo) {
 		for (i = 0; i < exec->bo_count; i++)
-			drm_gem_object_unreference(&exec->bo[i]->base);
+			drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked(&exec->bo[i]->base);
 		kfree(exec->bo);
 	}
 
@@ -723,9 +719,8 @@ vc4_complete_exec(struct drm_device *dev
 		struct vc4_bo *bo = list_first_entry(&exec->unref_list,
 						     struct vc4_bo, unref_head);
 		list_del(&bo->unref_head);
-		drm_gem_object_unreference(&bo->base.base);
+		drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked(&bo->base.base);
 	}
-	mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
 
 	mutex_lock(&vc4->power_lock);
 	if (--vc4->power_refcount == 0) {