diff options
| author | Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> | 2018-02-15 14:47:11 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com> | 2018-07-06 17:26:14 +0800 |
| commit | b1bbc119f1b9e86dcbbb8d45669c2c6f5b6fab9e (patch) | |
| tree | 2fe2d09a0dbc8a5f2f56fb2c42f8deaf1ddbfd08 /MdePkg/Library | |
| parent | 37218c3c2c4a02e396cbd205c25fe7300d3ac8c5 (diff) | |
| download | edk2-b1bbc119f1b9e86dcbbb8d45669c2c6f5b6fab9e.tar.gz edk2-b1bbc119f1b9e86dcbbb8d45669c2c6f5b6fab9e.tar.bz2 edk2-b1bbc119f1b9e86dcbbb8d45669c2c6f5b6fab9e.zip | |
MdePkg/BaseSafeIntLib: fix undefined behavior in SafeInt64Add()
The addition in the assignment
SignedResult = Augend + Addend;
is performed with unchecked INT64 operands. According to ISO C, if the
mathematical result of signed integer addition cannot be represented in
the result type, the behavior is undefined. (Refer to ISO C99 6.5p5.
6.2.5p9 only exempts unsigned integers, and 6.3.1.3p3 does not apply
because it treats the conversion of integers that have been successfully
evaluated first.)
Replace the after-the-fact result checking with checks on the operands,
and only perform the addition if it is safe.
Cc: Bret Barkelew <Bret.Barkelew@microsoft.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Sean Brogan <sean.brogan@microsoft.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit 41bfaffd13094d9042110091e6c37adf20c4032c)
Diffstat (limited to 'MdePkg/Library')
| -rw-r--r-- | MdePkg/Library/BaseSafeIntLib/SafeIntLib.c | 56 |
1 files changed, 46 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/MdePkg/Library/BaseSafeIntLib/SafeIntLib.c b/MdePkg/Library/BaseSafeIntLib/SafeIntLib.c index 8e857927b0..56d97cf656 100644 --- a/MdePkg/Library/BaseSafeIntLib/SafeIntLib.c +++ b/MdePkg/Library/BaseSafeIntLib/SafeIntLib.c @@ -3631,26 +3631,62 @@ SafeInt64Add ( )
{
RETURN_STATUS Status;
- INT64 SignedResult;
if (Result == NULL) {
return RETURN_INVALID_PARAMETER;
}
- SignedResult = Augend + Addend;
-
//
- // Adding positive to negative never overflows.
- // If you add two positive numbers, you expect a positive result.
- // If you add two negative numbers, you expect a negative result.
- // Overflow if inputs are the same sign and output is not that sign.
+ // * An Addend of zero can never cause underflow or overflow.
+ //
+ // * A positive Addend can only cause overflow. The overflow condition is
+ //
+ // (Augend + Addend) > MAX_INT64
+ //
+ // Subtracting Addend from both sides yields
+ //
+ // Augend > (MAX_INT64 - Addend)
+ //
+ // This condition can be coded directly in C because the RHS will neither
+ // underflow nor overflow. That is due to the starting condition:
+ //
+ // 0 < Addend <= MAX_INT64
+ //
+ // Multiplying all three sides by (-1) yields
+ //
+ // 0 > (-Addend) >= (-MAX_INT64)
+ //
+ // Adding MAX_INT64 to all three sides yields
+ //
+ // MAX_INT64 > (MAX_INT64 - Addend) >= 0
+ //
+ // * A negative Addend can only cause underflow. The underflow condition is
+ //
+ // (Augend + Addend) < MIN_INT64
+ //
+ // Subtracting Addend from both sides yields
+ //
+ // Augend < (MIN_INT64 - Addend)
+ //
+ // This condition can be coded directly in C because the RHS will neither
+ // underflow nor overflow. That is due to the starting condition:
+ //
+ // MIN_INT64 <= Addend < 0
+ //
+ // Multiplying all three sides by (-1) yields
+ //
+ // (-MIN_INT64) >= (-Addend) > 0
+ //
+ // Adding MIN_INT64 to all three sides yields
+ //
+ // 0 >= (MIN_INT64 - Addend) > MIN_INT64
//
- if (((Augend < 0) == (Addend < 0)) &&
- ((Augend < 0) != (SignedResult < 0))) {
+ if (((Addend > 0) && (Augend > (MAX_INT64 - Addend))) ||
+ ((Addend < 0) && (Augend < (MIN_INT64 - Addend)))) {
*Result = INT64_ERROR;
Status = RETURN_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL;
} else {
- *Result = SignedResult;
+ *Result = Augend + Addend;
Status = RETURN_SUCCESS;
}
|