| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix some bugs in the original PeiDxeTpmPlatformHierarchyLib.c.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Import PeiDxeTpmPlatformHierarchyLib from edk2-platforms without any
modifications.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855
The Tpm2GetCapabilitySupportedAndActivePcrs function prints a
count number that should reflect the *supported and currently
active* PCR banks, but the implementation in place displays
instead the count of the *supported PCR banks* retrieved
directly from the Tpm2GetCapabilityPcrs()
TPML_PCR_SELECTION output.
The counter should only take into account those PCRs banks
which are active.
Replaced usage of EFI_D_* for DEBUG_* definitions in debug
messages.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Qi Zhang <qi1.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Gonzalez del Cueto <rodrigo.gonzalez.del.cueto@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <Jiewen.yao@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commits add library, which consist functions to
enrolll Secure Boot keys and initialize Secure Boot
default variables. Some of the functions was moved
from SecureBootConfigImpl.c file.
Signed-off-by: Grzegorz Bernacki <gjb@semihalf.com>
Reviewed-by: Sunny Wang <sunny.wang@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <Jiewen.yao@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commits add library, which consist helper functions related
to creation/removal Secure Boot variables. Some of the functions
was moved from SecureBootConfigImpl.c file.
Signed-off-by: Grzegorz Bernacki <gjb@semihalf.com>
Reviewed-by: Sunny Wang <sunny.wang@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <Jiewen.yao@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3408
The value of SupportedAttributes in OpalGetSupportedAttributesInfo ()
is left undetermined, if the caller doesn't initialize it.
Initialize it in the function entry.
Signed-off-by: Scottie Kuo <scottie.kuo@intel.com>
Cc: Qi Zhang <qi1.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Maggie Chu <maggie.chu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <Jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This change added a new instance of Tpm2DeviceLibDTpm to support drivers
of type MM_STANDALONE. It abstracts dynamic Pcd access into separate file
for different instances to avoid dynamic usage for StandaloneMm modules.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Qi Zhang <qi1.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kun Qin <kun.q@outlook.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <Jiewen.yao@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This change extends this null instance of Tcg2PpVendorLib to support
MM_STANDALONE drivers.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Qi Zhang <qi1.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kun Qin <kun.q@outlook.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <Jiewen.yao@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This change added a new instance of Tcg2PhysicalPresenceLib to support
MM_STANDALONE type drivers. It centralizes the common routines into
shared files and abstract the library constructor into corresponding
files to implement each constructor function prototypes.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Qi Zhang <qi1.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kun Qin <kun.q@outlook.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <Jiewen.yao@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit 6c8dd15c4ae42501438a525ec41299f365f223cb.
Based on the discussion https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/67764,
this change is regarded as the feature request. But, it doesn't pass
reviewed before 202011 stable tag soft feature freeze. So, it should
not be merged into 202011 stable tag.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Nishant C Mistry <nishant.c.mistry@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Acked-by: Jiewen Yao <Jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <Jiewen.yao@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2594
The re-design requires multiple RPMC counter usages.
The consumer will be capable of selecting amongst multiple counters.
Signed-off-by: Nishant C Mistry <nishant.c.mistry@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2522
Causes AuthService to check
IsVariablePolicyEnabled() before enforcing
write protections to allow variable deletion
when policy engine is disabled.
Only allows deletion, not modification.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Bret Barkelew <brbarkel@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Bret Barkelew <brbarkel@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2697
Tcg2PhysicalPresenceLibConstructor set the module variable
mIsTcg2PPVerLowerThan_1_3 with incorrect TCG version comparision.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhichao Gao <zhichao.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2963
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Qi Zhang <qi1.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2943
Disable SHA1 base on the MACRO DISABLE_SHA1_DEPRECATED_INTERFACES.
SHA1 is deprecated function and the MACRO is used to remove the whole
implementation of the SHA1. For the platforms that do not need SHA1
for security, the MACRO should works for DxeImageVerificationLib as
well.
Signed-off-by: Zhichao Gao <zhichao.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Min Xu <min.m.xu@intel.com>
Cc: Qi Zhang <qi1.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <Jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The DxeImageVerificationHandler() function currently checks whether
"SecDataDir" has enough room for "WinCertificate->dwLength". However, for
advancing "OffSet", "WinCertificate->dwLength" is aligned to the next
multiple of 8. If "WinCertificate->dwLength" is large enough, the
alignment will return 0, and "OffSet" will be stuck at the same value.
Check whether "SecDataDir" has room left for both
"WinCertificate->dwLength" and the alignment.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Min Xu <min.m.xu@intel.com>
Cc: Wenyi Xie <xiewenyi2@huawei.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2215
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200901091221.20948-4-lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Wenyi Xie <xiewenyi2@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Min M Xu <min.m.xu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently the (SecDataDirLeft <= sizeof (WIN_CERTIFICATE)) check only
guards the de-referencing of the "WinCertificate" pointer. It does not
guard the calculation of the pointer itself:
WinCertificate = (WIN_CERTIFICATE *) (mImageBase + OffSet);
This is wrong; if we don't know for sure that we have enough room for a
WIN_CERTIFICATE, then even creating such a pointer, not just
de-referencing it, may invoke undefined behavior.
Move the pointer calculation after the size check.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Min Xu <min.m.xu@intel.com>
Cc: Wenyi Xie <xiewenyi2@huawei.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2215
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200901091221.20948-3-lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Wenyi Xie <xiewenyi2@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Min M Xu <min.m.xu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The following two quantities:
SecDataDir->VirtualAddress + SecDataDir->Size
SecDataDir->VirtualAddress + SecDataDir->Size - OffSet
are used multiple times in DxeImageVerificationHandler(). Introduce helper
variables for them: "SecDataDirEnd" and "SecDataDirLeft", respectively.
This saves us multiple calculations and significantly simplifies the code.
Note that all three summands above have type UINT32, therefore the new
variables are also of type UINT32.
This patch does not change behavior.
(Note that the code already handles the case when the
SecDataDir->VirtualAddress + SecDataDir->Size
UINT32 addition overflows -- namely, in that case, the certificate loop is
never entered, and the corruption check right after the loop fires.)
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Min Xu <min.m.xu@intel.com>
Cc: Wenyi Xie <xiewenyi2@huawei.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2215
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200901091221.20948-2-lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Wenyi Xie <xiewenyi2@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Min M Xu <min.m.xu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2376
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Qi Zhang <qi1.zhang@intel.com>
Message-Id: <20200818062618.3698-2-qi1.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <Jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2361
Cc: Qi Zhang <qi1.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Guomin Jiang <guomin.jiang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maciej Rabeda <maciej.rabeda@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Tpm2GetCapabilityIsCommandImplemented
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2793
check if the commad is supported by comparing the command code with
command index.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Qi Zhang <qi1.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2841
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Qi Zhang <qi1.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Qi Zhang <qi1.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2713
In current code, If TCG2_PHYSICAL_PRESENCE_FLAGS_VARIABLE variable
is not exist, code will get default value from two places.
This fix is to make the default value comes from the PCD
gEfiSecurityPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdTcg2PhysicalPresenceFlags
Signed-off-by: Maggie Chu <maggie.chu@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2652
According to the File description, the File is optional and can be NULL.
Signed-off-by: Guomin Jiang <guomin.jiang@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2652
According to the File description, The File is optional and can be NULL.
Signed-off-by: Guomin Jiang <guomin.jiang@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2652
DxeTpm2MeasureBootHandler() and DxeTpmMeasureBootHandler() functions may
receive a FileBuffer argument that is not associated with any particular
device path (e.g., because the UEFI image has not been loaded from any
particular device path).
Therefore rejecting (File==NULL) at the top of the function is invalid.
Fixes: 4b026f0d5af36faf3a3629a3ad49c51b5b3be12f
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Guomin Jiang <guomin.jiang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2594
Add null version of VariableKeyLib instance. The full version should be
provided by platforms which supports key generator.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Nishant C Mistry <nishant.c.mistry@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@microsoft.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2594
Add null version of RpmcLib instance. The full version should be provided
by platform which supports RPMC device.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Nishant C Mistry <nishant.c.mistry@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(CVE-2019-14575)
IsCertHashFoundInDatabase() is actually used only for searching dbx,
according to the function logic, its comments and its use cases. Changing
it to IsCertHashFoundInDbx to avoid confusion.
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1608
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(CVE-2019-14575)
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1608
To avoid false-negative issue in check hash against dbx, both error
condition (as return value) and check result (as out parameter) of
IsSignatureFoundInDatabase() are added. So the caller of this function
will know exactly if a failure is caused by a black list hit or
other error happening, and enforce a more secure operation to prevent
secure boot from being bypassed. For a white list check (db), there's
no such necessity.
All intermediate results inside this function will be checked and
returned immediately upon any failure or error, like out-of-resource,
hash calculation error or certificate retrieval failure.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(CVE-2019-14575)
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1608
If the second GetVariable() call for "dbx" fails, in IsForbiddenByDbx(),
we have to free Data. Jump to "Done" for that.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1608
All intermediate results inside this function will be checked and
returned immediately upon any failure or error, like out-of-resource,
hash calculation error or certificate retrieval failure.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(CVE-2019-14575)
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1608
To avoid false-negative issue in check hash against dbx, both error
condition (as return value) and check result (as out parameter) of
IsCertHashFoundInDatabase() are added. So the caller of this function
will know exactly if a failure is caused by a black list hit or
other error happening, and enforce a more secure operation to prevent
secure boot from being bypassed. For a white list check (db), there's
no such necessity.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(CVE-2019-14575)
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1608
The dbx fetching code inside the while/for-loop causes code hard to
understand. Since there's no need to get dbx more than once, this patch
simplify the code logic by moving related code to be outside the while-
loop. db fetching code is also refined accordingly to reduce the indent
level of code.
More comments are also added or refined to explain more details.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(CVE-2019-14575)
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1608
In timestamp check after the cert is found in db, the original code jumps
to 'Done' if any error happens in fetching dbx variable. At any of the
jump, VerifyStatus equals to TRUE, which means allowed-by-db. This should
not be allowed except to EFI_NOT_FOUND case (meaning dbx doesn't exist),
because it could be used to bypass timestamp check.
This patch add code to change VerifyStatus to FALSE in the case of memory
allocation failure and dbx fetching failure to avoid potential bypass
issue.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(CVE-2019-14575)
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1608
Normally two times of calling gRT->GetVariable() are needed to get
the data of a variable: get the variable size by passing zero variable
size, and then allocate enough memory and pass the correct variable size
and buffer.
But in the inner loop in IsAllowedByDb(), the DbxDataSize was not
initialized to zero before calling gRT->GetVariable(). It won't cause
problem if dbx does not exist. But it will give wrong result if dbx
exists and the DbxDataSize happens to be a small enough value. In this
situation, EFI_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL will be returned. Then the result check
code followed will jump to 'Done', which is not correct because it's
actually the value expected.
if (Status == EFI_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL) {
goto Done;
}
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(CVE-2019-14575)
In case the signers' certificate stack, retrieved from the PE/COFF image's
Authenticode blob, has zero elements (=there are zero signer certificates),
then we should consider the image forbidden by DBX, not accepted by DBX.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1608
Pointer HashCtx used in IsCertHashFoundInDatabase() is not freed inside
the while-loop, if it will run more than once.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix various typos in documentation, comments and debug strings.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Antoine Coeur <coeur@gmx.fr>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200207010831.9046-66-philmd@redhat.com>
[lersek@redhat.com: replace EFI_D_xxx w/ DEBUG_xxx to shut up PatchCheck]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix various typos in comments and documentation.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Antoine Coeur <coeur@gmx.fr>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200207010831.9046-65-philmd@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix few typos in comments and documentation.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Antoine Coeur <coeur@gmx.fr>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200207010831.9046-63-philmd@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The DxeTpmMeasureBootHandler and DxeTpm2MeasureBootHandler handlers
are SECURITY2_FILE_AUTHENTICATION_HANDLER prototype. This prototype
can not return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER.
The prototype documentation states it returns EFI_ACCESS_DENIED if:
"The file specified by File and FileBuffer did not authenticate,
and the platform policy dictates that the DXE Foundation may not
use File."
Correct the documentation, and add a early check, returning
EFI_ACCESS_DENIED when File is NULL.
Noticed while reviewing commit 6d57592740cdd0b6868baeef7929d6e6fef.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2472
Replace the ASSERT with the error code return in the TpmPhysicalPresence
and GetTpmCapability.
Add missing error checking after call TpmPhysicalPresence in
TcgPhysicalPresenceLibProcessRequest.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhichao Gao <zhichao.gao@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In DxeImageVerificationHandler(), we should return EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION
for a rejected image only if the platform sets
DEFER_EXECUTE_ON_SECURITY_VIOLATION as the policy for the image's source.
Otherwise, EFI_ACCESS_DENIED must be returned.
Right now, EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION is returned for all rejected images,
which is wrong -- it causes LoadImage() to hold on to rejected images (in
untrusted state), for further platform actions. However, if a platform
already set DENY_EXECUTE_ON_SECURITY_VIOLATION, the platform will not
expect the rejected image to stick around in memory (regardless of its
untrusted state).
Therefore, adhere to the platform policy in the return value of the
DxeImageVerificationHandler() function.
Furthermore, according to "32.4.2 Image Execution Information Table" in
the UEFI v2.8 spec, and considering that edk2 only supports (AuditMode==0)
at the moment:
> When AuditMode==0, if the image's signature is not found in the
> authorized database, or is found in the forbidden database, the image
> will not be started and instead, information about it will be placed in
> this table.
we have to store an EFI_IMAGE_EXECUTION_INFO record in both the "defer"
case and the "deny" case. Thus, the AddImageExeInfo() call is not being
made conditional on (Policy == DEFER_EXECUTE_ON_SECURITY_VIOLATION); the
documentation is updated instead.
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2129
Fixes: 5db28a6753d307cdfb1cfdeb2f63739a9f959837
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200116190705.18816-12-lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
[lersek@redhat.com: push with Mike's R-b due to Chinese New Year
Holiday: <https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/53429>; msgid
<d3fbb76dabed4e1987c512c328c82810@intel.com>]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It makes no sense to call AddImageExeInfo() with (Signature == NULL) and
(SignatureSize > 0). AddImageExeInfo() does not crash in such a case -- it
avoids the CopyMem() call --, but it creates an invalid
EFI_IMAGE_EXECUTION_INFO record. Namely, the
"EFI_IMAGE_EXECUTION_INFO.InfoSize" field includes "SignatureSize", but
the actual signature bytes are not filled in.
Document and ASSERT() this condition in AddImageExeInfo().
In DxeImageVerificationHandler(), zero out "SignatureListSize" if we set
"SignatureList" to NULL due to AllocateZeroPool() failure.
(Another approach could be to avoid calling AddImageExeInfo() completely,
in case AllocateZeroPool() fails. Unfortunately, the UEFI v2.8 spec does
not seem to state clearly whether a signature is mandatory in
EFI_IMAGE_EXECUTION_INFO, if the "Action" field is
EFI_IMAGE_EXECUTION_AUTH_SIG_FAILED or EFI_IMAGE_EXECUTION_AUTH_SIG_FOUND.
For now, the EFI_IMAGE_EXECUTION_INFO addition logic is not changed; we
only make sure that the record we add is not malformed.)
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2129
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200116190705.18816-11-lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
[lersek@redhat.com: push with Mike's R-b due to Chinese New Year
Holiday: <https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/53429>; msgid
<d3fbb76dabed4e1987c512c328c82810@intel.com>]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
"FileBuffer" is a non-optional input (pointer) parameter to
DxeImageVerificationHandler(). Normally, when an edk2 function receives a
NULL argument for such a parameter, we return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER or
RETURN_INVALID_PARAMETER. However, those don't conform to the
SECURITY2_FILE_AUTHENTICATION_HANDLER prototype.
Return EFI_ACCESS_DENIED when "FileBuffer" is NULL; it means that no image
has been loaded.
This patch does not change the control flow in the function, it only
changes the "Status" outcome from API-incompatible error codes to
EFI_ACCESS_DENIED, under some circumstances.
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2129
Fixes: 570b3d1a7278df29878da87990e8366bd42d0ec5
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200116190705.18816-10-lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
[lersek@redhat.com: push with Mike's R-b due to Chinese New Year
Holiday: <https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/53429>; msgid
<d3fbb76dabed4e1987c512c328c82810@intel.com>]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The "Status" variable is set to EFI_ACCESS_DENIED at the top of the
function. Then it is overwritten with EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION under the
"Failed" (earlier: "Done") label. We finally return "Status".
The above covers the complete usage of "Status" in
DxeImageVerificationHandler(). Remove the variable, and simply return
EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION in the end.
This patch is a no-op, regarding behavior.
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2129
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200116190705.18816-9-lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
[lersek@redhat.com: push with Mike's R-b due to Chinese New Year
Holiday: <https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/53429>; msgid
<d3fbb76dabed4e1987c512c328c82810@intel.com>]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Before the "Done" label at the end of DxeImageVerificationHandler(), we
now have a single access to "Status": we set "Status" to EFI_ACCESS_DENIED
at the top of the function. Therefore, the (Status != EFI_SUCCESS)
condition is always true under the "Done" label.
Accordingly, unnest the AddImageExeInfo() call dependent on that
condition, remove the condition, and also rename the "Done" label to
"Failed".
Functionally, this patch is a no-op. It's easier to review with:
git show -b -W
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2129
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200116190705.18816-8-lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
[lersek@redhat.com: replace EFI_D_INFO w/ DEBUG_INFO for PatchCheck.py]
[lersek@redhat.com: push with Mike's R-b due to Chinese New Year
Holiday: <https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/53429>; msgid
<d3fbb76dabed4e1987c512c328c82810@intel.com>]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
After the final "IsVerified" check, we set "Status" to EFI_ACCESS_DENIED.
This is superfluous, as "Status" already carries EFI_ACCESS_DENIED value
there, from the top of the function. Remove the assignment.
Functionally, this change is a no-op.
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2129
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200116190705.18816-7-lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
[lersek@redhat.com: push with Mike's R-b due to Chinese New Year
Holiday: <https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/53429>; msgid
<d3fbb76dabed4e1987c512c328c82810@intel.com>]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A SECURITY2_FILE_AUTHENTICATION_HANDLER function is not expected to return
EFI_OUT_OF_RESOURCES. We should only return EFI_SUCCESS,
EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION, or EFI_ACCESS_DENIED.
In case we run out of memory while preparing "SignatureList" for
AddImageExeInfo(), we should simply stick with the EFI_ACCESS_DENIED value
that is already in "Status" -- from just before the "Action" condition --,
and not suppress it with EFI_OUT_OF_RESOURCES.
This patch does not change the control flow in the function, it only
changes the "Status" outcome from API-incompatible error codes to
EFI_ACCESS_DENIED, under some circumstances.
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2129
Fixes: 570b3d1a7278df29878da87990e8366bd42d0ec5
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200116190705.18816-6-lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
[lersek@redhat.com: push with Mike's R-b due to Chinese New Year
Holiday: <https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/53429>; msgid
<d3fbb76dabed4e1987c512c328c82810@intel.com>]
|