diff options
author | Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org> | 2021-08-03 11:54:56 +1000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de> | 2021-08-17 16:29:23 +0000 |
commit | e44e6eb32ff1dcde3305535ecf38e74b8c736c02 (patch) | |
tree | 33e05cab6b0517eada02fdf22dbd15aaba88c731 /nicintel_eeprom.c | |
parent | 099be52132361be2aa37c19bb444b35b931abecc (diff) | |
download | flashrom-e44e6eb32ff1dcde3305535ecf38e74b8c736c02.tar.gz flashrom-e44e6eb32ff1dcde3305535ecf38e74b8c736c02.tar.bz2 flashrom-e44e6eb32ff1dcde3305535ecf38e74b8c736c02.zip |
nicintel_eeprom: Check UNPROG_DEVICE in 82580 shutdown
Previously shutdown function was registered conditionally for 82580,
only if the device was not UNPROG_DEVICE. This patch moves the check
for UNPROG_DEVICE into shutdown function itself, so that shutdown
function can be always registered for 82580.
This also fixes a memory leak in nicintel_ee_shutdown_82580.
No changes for i210 device init/shutdown, only for 82580.
And very importantly this unlocks API change which plans to move
register_shutdown inside register_opaque_master, similar to what's
done in CB:56103
BUG=b:185191942
TEST=builds
Change-Id: I5c729a3a63d0106e65525a6a77b2f9104c96847f
Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/56821
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'nicintel_eeprom.c')
-rw-r--r-- | nicintel_eeprom.c | 38 |
1 files changed, 24 insertions, 14 deletions
diff --git a/nicintel_eeprom.c b/nicintel_eeprom.c index 430a980e5..ec0f04ef6 100644 --- a/nicintel_eeprom.c +++ b/nicintel_eeprom.c @@ -431,18 +431,26 @@ static int nicintel_ee_shutdown_i210(void *arg) static int nicintel_ee_shutdown_82580(void *eecp) { - uint32_t old_eec = *(uint32_t *)eecp; - /* Request bitbanging and unselect the chip first to be safe. */ - if (nicintel_ee_req() || nicintel_ee_bitset(EEC, EE_CS, 1)) - return -1; + int ret = 0; + + if (nicintel_pci->device_id != UNPROG_DEVICE) { + uint32_t old_eec = *(uint32_t *)eecp; + /* Request bitbanging and unselect the chip first to be safe. */ + if (nicintel_ee_req() || nicintel_ee_bitset(EEC, EE_CS, 1)) { + ret = -1; + goto out; + } - /* Try to restore individual bits we care about. */ - int ret = nicintel_ee_bitset(EEC, EE_SCK, old_eec & BIT(EE_SCK)); - ret |= nicintel_ee_bitset(EEC, EE_SI, old_eec & BIT(EE_SI)); - ret |= nicintel_ee_bitset(EEC, EE_CS, old_eec & BIT(EE_CS)); - /* REQ will be cleared by hardware anyway after 2 seconds of inactivity on the SPI pins (3.3.2.1). */ - ret |= nicintel_ee_bitset(EEC, EE_REQ, old_eec & BIT(EE_REQ)); + /* Try to restore individual bits we care about. */ + ret = nicintel_ee_bitset(EEC, EE_SCK, old_eec & BIT(EE_SCK)); + ret |= nicintel_ee_bitset(EEC, EE_SI, old_eec & BIT(EE_SI)); + ret |= nicintel_ee_bitset(EEC, EE_CS, old_eec & BIT(EE_CS)); + /* REQ will be cleared by hardware anyway after 2 seconds of inactivity + * on the SPI pins (3.3.2.1). */ + ret |= nicintel_ee_bitset(EEC, EE_REQ, old_eec & BIT(EE_REQ)); + } +out: free(eecp); return ret; } @@ -465,6 +473,8 @@ static int nicintel_ee_init(void) if (!nicintel_eebar) return 1; + uint32_t *eecp = NULL; + nicintel_pci = dev; if (dev->device_id != UNPROG_DEVICE) { uint32_t eec = pci_mmio_readl(nicintel_eebar + EEC); @@ -477,15 +487,15 @@ static int nicintel_ee_init(void) return 1; } - uint32_t *eecp = malloc(sizeof(uint32_t)); + eecp = malloc(sizeof(uint32_t)); if (eecp == NULL) return 1; *eecp = eec; - - if (register_shutdown(nicintel_ee_shutdown_82580, eecp)) - return 1; } + if (register_shutdown(nicintel_ee_shutdown_82580, eecp)) + return 1; + return register_opaque_master(&opaque_master_nicintel_ee_82580, NULL); } else { nicintel_eebar = rphysmap("Intel i210 NIC w/ emulated EEPROM", |