summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/tests
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAnastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>2021-11-29 17:00:27 +1100
committerAnastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>2022-03-20 22:18:40 +0000
commite539d112cd12ba5d3967b6956af1d91e5bf674a8 (patch)
tree448ac017a43fb45c647f69274b57c8986938a1a1 /tests
parent0f51f62c6265af5977fec7425596b65a3926c42b (diff)
downloadflashrom-e539d112cd12ba5d3967b6956af1d91e5bf674a8.tar.gz
flashrom-e539d112cd12ba5d3967b6956af1d91e5bf674a8.tar.bz2
flashrom-e539d112cd12ba5d3967b6956af1d91e5bf674a8.zip
tests: Add run_probe_lifecycle and add dummyflasher probe test
This patch implements run_probe_lifecycle and adds dummyflasher test to run probing lifecycle. A lifecycle consists of 3 steps: 1) init programmer 2) do some action 3) shutdown programmer. Step 2 can be "do nothing", and this is named "basic lifecycle", i.e. the simplest. This patch implements "probe lifecycle" which probes a chip as Step 2. Internally there is one run_lifecycle function which performs steps 1, 2, 3. run_lifecycle is operating via libflashrom API. Long term goal for cli_classic is to operate via libflashrom API, so the test aligns with this approach. BUG=b:181803212 TEST=ninja test Change-Id: I9eb7fe3a436fbba5e70db957139fd26e00efec36 Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/59741 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Thomas Heijligen <src@posteo.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'tests')
-rw-r--r--tests/lifecycle.c61
-rw-r--r--tests/tests.c1
-rw-r--r--tests/tests.h1
3 files changed, 56 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/tests/lifecycle.c b/tests/lifecycle.c
index 8cb604be3..c439ff72d 100644
--- a/tests/lifecycle.c
+++ b/tests/lifecycle.c
@@ -16,26 +16,64 @@
#include <include/test.h>
#include <string.h>
+#include "libflashrom.h"
#include "io_mock.h"
#include "programmer.h"
+#include "spi.h"
-static void run_basic_lifecycle(void **state, const struct programmer_entry *prog, const char *param)
+static void probe_chip(const struct programmer_entry *prog,
+ struct flashrom_programmer *flashprog,
+ const char *const chip_name)
+{
+ struct flashrom_flashctx *flashctx;
+
+ printf("Testing flashrom_flash_probe for programmer=%s, chip=%s ... \n", prog->name, chip_name);
+ assert_int_equal(0, flashrom_flash_probe(&flashctx, flashprog, chip_name));
+ printf("... flashrom_flash_probe for programmer=%s successful\n", prog->name);
+
+ flashrom_flash_release(flashctx); /* cleanup */
+}
+
+static void run_lifecycle(void **state, const struct programmer_entry *prog,
+ const char *param, const char *const chip_name,
+ void (*action)(const struct programmer_entry *prog,
+ struct flashrom_programmer *flashprog,
+ const char *const chip_name))
{
(void) state; /* unused */
+ struct flashrom_programmer *flashprog;
char *param_dup = strdup(param);
- printf("Testing programmer_init for programmer=%s ...\n", prog->name);
- assert_int_equal(0, programmer_init(prog, param_dup));
- printf("... programmer_init for programmer=%s successful\n", prog->name);
+ printf("Testing flashrom_programmer_init for programmer=%s ...\n", prog->name);
+ assert_int_equal(0, flashrom_programmer_init(&flashprog, prog->name, param_dup));
+ printf("... flashrom_programmer_init for programmer=%s successful\n", prog->name);
- printf("Testing programmer_shutdown for programmer=%s ...\n", prog->name);
- assert_int_equal(0, programmer_shutdown());
- printf("... programmer_shutdown for programmer=%s successful\n", prog->name);
+ if (action)
+ action(prog, flashprog, chip_name);
+
+ printf("Testing flashrom_programmer_shutdown for programmer=%s ...\n", prog->name);
+ assert_int_equal(0, flashrom_programmer_shutdown(flashprog));
+ printf("... flashrom_programmer_shutdown for programmer=%s successful\n", prog->name);
free(param_dup);
}
+static void run_basic_lifecycle(void **state, const struct programmer_entry *prog, const char *param)
+{
+ /* Basic lifecycle only does init and shutdown,
+ * so neither chip name nor action is needed. */
+ run_lifecycle(state, prog, param, NULL /* chip_name */, NULL /* action */);
+}
+
+static void run_probe_lifecycle(void **state, const struct programmer_entry *prog,
+ const char *param, const char *const chip_name)
+{
+ /* Each probe lifecycle should run independently, without cache. */
+ clear_spi_id_cache();
+ run_lifecycle(state, prog, param, chip_name, &probe_chip);
+}
+
void dummy_basic_lifecycle_test_success(void **state)
{
#if CONFIG_DUMMY == 1
@@ -45,6 +83,15 @@ void dummy_basic_lifecycle_test_success(void **state)
#endif
}
+void dummy_probe_lifecycle_test_success(void **state)
+{
+#if CONFIG_DUMMY == 1
+ run_probe_lifecycle(state, &programmer_dummy, "bus=spi,emulate=W25Q128FV", "W25Q128.V");
+#else
+ skip();
+#endif
+}
+
void nicrealtek_basic_lifecycle_test_success(void **state)
{
#if CONFIG_NICREALTEK == 1
diff --git a/tests/tests.c b/tests/tests.c
index 21cc1ed8c..0f160417a 100644
--- a/tests/tests.c
+++ b/tests/tests.c
@@ -364,6 +364,7 @@ int main(void)
const struct CMUnitTest lifecycle_tests[] = {
cmocka_unit_test(dummy_basic_lifecycle_test_success),
+ cmocka_unit_test(dummy_probe_lifecycle_test_success),
cmocka_unit_test(nicrealtek_basic_lifecycle_test_success),
cmocka_unit_test(raiden_debug_basic_lifecycle_test_success),
cmocka_unit_test(dediprog_basic_lifecycle_test_success),
diff --git a/tests/tests.h b/tests/tests.h
index 1218a30c0..5f05abfff 100644
--- a/tests/tests.h
+++ b/tests/tests.h
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ void probe_spi_st95_test_success(void **state); /* spi95.c */
/* lifecycle.c */
void dummy_basic_lifecycle_test_success(void **state);
+void dummy_probe_lifecycle_test_success(void **state);
void nicrealtek_basic_lifecycle_test_success(void **state);
void raiden_debug_basic_lifecycle_test_success(void **state);
void dediprog_basic_lifecycle_test_success(void **state);