summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/flashchips.c
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Add support for M95M02-A125Konstantin Grudnev2019-10-041-0/+27
| | | | | | | | | | | | Automotive 2 Mbit (256KiB) serial SPI bus EEPROM PREW tested successfully with use of ch341a programmer on Linux host 5.2.0-1-MANJARO x86_64 Signed-off-by: Konstantin Grudnev <grudnevkv@gmail.com> Change-Id: Ic29cd9051c7eac4822d620c299834134f987f01b Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/34496 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
* flashchips.c: Add W25Q128.V..M printlock attributeAlan Green2019-09-241-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | Add a printlock attribute for the Winbond W25Q128.V..M chip. The printlock attributes matches the ChromiumOS repo's definition of this chip. Signed-off-by: Alan Green <avg@google.com> Change-Id: I775d5d40677593dcb2d05750f8bbc62871b0e551 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/35549 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
* flashchips.c: Mark W25Q40EW as TESTED_PREWAlan Green2019-09-241-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Mark Winbond W25Q40EW as TESTED_PREW. The Winbond W25Q40EW has been marked TESTED_PREW in the ChromiumOS repository. ChromiumOS has the same defintion for this chip as this repo, except that ChromiumOS does not have FEATURE_OTP. Signed-off-by: Alan Green <avg@google.com> Change-Id: I4be5b2e1069a3f735f0dc6ec92d5f4c8946fbb02 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/35535 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
* flashchips.c: Add GD25Q256D from downstreamAlan Green2019-09-241-0/+38
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Take definition of GD25Q256D from ChromiumOS repository. This chip was added in `commit 0c38355c` by dlaurie@google.com 2019-03-17. Signed-off-by: Alan Green <avg@google.com> Change-Id: I79d4ed48aa9126a8a6ce455a9564451346195b8f Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/35480 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
* flashchips.c: Mark EN29F002(A)(N)B as tested +EWAlan Green2019-09-181-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Mark EN29F002(A)(N)B as tested for erase and write. This chip was marked tested in the Chromium (downstream) repo change 98d917cfba55b68516cdf64c754d2f36c8c26722 "Add a bunch of new/tested stuff and various small changes 8" TEST=Build and run flashrom -L Signed-off-by: Alan Green <avg@google.com> Change-Id: Idd26187905f389fc858eea5b13915af88e40afe9 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/35092 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
* flashchips.c: Identify MX25L25645G partAlan Green2019-09-171-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Apply downstream patch d978051c2e7da88088ec4ef19827c04873a5479d, "flashrom: Identify MX25L25645G part" from chris_zhou@compal.corp-partner.google.com 2019-04-13. Change description was: """ MX25L25635F and MX25L25645G have the same chips identify. Add MX25L25645G to the name of the part so that it doesn't confused people. """ Signed-off-by: Alan Green <avg@google.com> Change-Id: I317345b4753cfc46fdca8f673a0591e33b62138b Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/35091 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
* flashchips: Add GD25Q127C name to the GD25Q128C entryAlan Green2019-09-171-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Renamed GigaDevice GD25Q128 to GD25Q127C/GD25Q128. According to downstream (ChromiumOS) change 4216ba3d0fbd1804a71002b9c17e0b04029a03f1 "flashchips: Add GD25Q127C name to the GD25Q128C entry", the 127C chip is replacement for the 128C chip. I have confirmed that 127C is newer and that 128C does not appear to be documented on Gigadevice's website or available from Digikey. TEST=Ran flashrom -L Signed-off-by: Alan Green <avg@google.com> Change-Id: I3366e5904eff2443fda90552f7f5e31a8785d8b3 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/35089 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
* flashchips.c: Put SFDP-capable chip back into positionAlan Green2019-09-171-22/+22
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Put entry for Unknown SFDP-capable chip back into place at end of file. Change 1f9cc7d89992114c70f7a0545ad9f98701bebe56 "flashchips.c: Sort file by vendor and model" reordered many entries in flashchips.c, including this one. However, the entry for Unknown, SFDP-capable chip should not have been moved before any specific chip entries. As reported by Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> at https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/33931: """ Oops, this introduced a bug: the SFDP entry is no longer at the end of flashchips.c, so probing on a SFDP-capable Winbond chip results in added noise (flashrom says things about an unknown chip, and then has two definitions for the same chip). """ Signed-off-by: Alan Green <avg@google.com> Change-Id: I5955020456dbcd5e7db280a459b668a743e464dc Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/35037 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
* flashchips: upstream changes to GD25LQ128Alan Green2019-08-211-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Change name of GD25LQ128 to GD25LQ128CD. This is an upstreaming of the change from the chromium flashrom repo SHA 6c957d745f5d3dcadd1035734a5cf1b804bd0f2f (Also visible at https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromiumos/third_party/flashrom/+/1181175) The rationale from that change was: The GD25LQ128C part is EOL. It's replacement is GD25LQ128D, but both chips identify in the same manner. Add GD25LQ128D to the name of the part so that it doesn't confused people. Making this name consistent will simplify further merging from the chromium fork. Change-Id: I57804f1a33170668e029a7b08ac050d9a3bd6dbb Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/34735 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
* flashchips: Add missing MT25Q erase commandsJacob Creedon2019-08-051-0/+18
| | | | | | | | | | | This adds additional 32KiB subsector erase commands 0x5c and 0x52 and an additional bulk erase command of 0x60. Signed-off-by: Jacob Creedon <jcreedon@google.com> Change-Id: I5307c4b96cbd62203f5bad0c94737180fda621aa Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/34490 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
* flashchips: Fix N25Q512 bulk eraseJacob Creedon2019-08-051-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | The N25Q is a stacked device, so it requires 0xC4 to perform a die erase. Signed-off-by: Jacob Creedon <jcreedon@google.com> Change-Id: Ib408fbe5633abd8b657e3907142b997e88b33f84 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/34489 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
* flashchips: Split MT25Q from N25QJacob Creedon2019-08-051-2/+82
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The MT25Q is the successor to the N25Q from Micron/Numonyx/ST. The MT25Q is almost entirely backwards compatible with the N25Q series, however, the MT25Q has additional subsector erase commands available, and there are differences in stacked devices in the higher capacity variants. The N25Q devices are left with "Micron/Numonyx/ST" as the vendor and MT25Q devices are set with "Micron" as the vendor. Signed-off-by: Jacob Creedon <jcreedon@google.com> Change-Id: I9d79978544b19cf9acd5f3ea6196cf6f3b3435ef Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/34488 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
* flashchips.c: Mark AMD Am29F010A/B as TEST_OK_PREAlan Green2019-08-031-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The AMD Am29F010 was marked TEST_OK_PRE in chromium repo change SHA d217d1219ccaa43a01cd75475409183bd5714410. There are no other differences in the definition of this chip. This is the only change from the Chromium repo to be upstreamed for AMD chips. Signed-off-by: Alan Green <avg@google.com> Change-Id: I7fa10d33b42c09d035c611535a54592083c4eaa0 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/34534 Tested-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
* flashchips.c: Mark Intel 82802AB as TEST_OK_PREWAlan Green2019-08-031-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Intel 82802AB Was marked as TEST_OK_PREW in the Chromium fork in their SHA312d9ff1fb1ccb5533a867d4248eb1be95ec3fbc. The definitions in the fork and here in upstream are otherwise substantially similar. There are no other downstream changes for Intel chips to be upstreamed. Signed-off-by: Alan Green <avg@google.com> Change-Id: Iec75f0b1c35000308601fa6fdd63ab1738d0ef94 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/34533 Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org> Tested-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
* flashchips: Add Macronix MX25L51245G as known chipHemanth Guruva Reddy2019-07-171-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | MX25L51245G is identical to handling of MX66L51235F. Change-Id: I964e630197e33d69b199fdfb8816f18e3112bbb1 Signed-off-by: Hemanth Guruva Reddy <meethemanth@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/34234 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
* flashchips.c: Make .tested lines consistentAlan Green2019-07-051-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | As per comments on https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/33833/, make placement of spaces in .tested attributes with literal definitions consistent. Signed-off-by: Alan Green <avg@google.com> Change-Id: I18118f9f1e858547170fda8412bf6769f5cdcf53 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/33998 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
* flashchips.c: Sort file by vendor and modelAlan Green2019-07-051-4145/+4148
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | For self-consistency, and to allow tools to assist with merging the chromium fork of flashrom, sort the entries of flashchips.c. The file is already largely sorted, though deviations have crept in over time. This is a non-clever mostly ASCII-order sorting. It is not intended to be permanent. Change-Id: I75a99583592526f60ba5264e92391bf8b1213b20 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/33931 Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
* flashchips.c: Format SFDP-capable chip entryAlan Green2019-07-041-9/+8
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | To allow automated tools to manipulate flashchips.c, make the definition of SFDP-capable chip more consistent with other definitions. This involves - reordering fields to match both other entries and the definition of struct flashchip. - reformatting comments to make them consistent with other entries. Signed-off-by: Alan Green <avg@google.com> Change-Id: I8708a11993822085b3e8d8c80532dfb935d39876 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/33834 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
* flashchips.c: Make comment placement consistentAlan Green2019-07-041-1/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | For consistency, move a comment about an entry from inside the open brace to outside it. Signed-off-by: Alan Green <avg@google.com> Change-Id: Ie9a745b7e7dc752cfd6fc14ebeb04754179893c6 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/33837 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
* flashchips.c: Fix field orderAlan Green2019-07-041-15/+15
| | | | | | | | | | | | | For consistency and in order to allow automated tools to work with flashchips.c, put fields in the same order as they are defined in struct flashchip, in flash.h Signed-off-by: Alan Green <avg@google.com> Change-Id: I5e0d81cb71b2c50ffeb9bb70267f16e9ac7a263c Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/33833 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
* flashchips.c: Add comma after every .voltage attributeAlan Green2019-07-041-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | To allow automated tools to manipulate flashchips.c, ensure that every voltage attribute ends with a comma, even if it is the last member in the definition. Signed-off-by: Alan Green <avg@google.com> Change-Id: Ie609d11ab846361f375f7b024d6ca55f83b01682 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/33832 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
* flashchips: Drop dead code of AT26DF321Alan Green2019-07-041-19/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The definition for the AT26DF321 has been commented out since it was first added in 2008. The chip now appears to be obsolete, being marked "obsolete" and unstocked at Digikey. It is also only referred to in historical documents on the manufacturer's website (microchip.com). To avoid further bitrot of this dead code, drop it. Signed-off-by: Alan Green <avg@google.com> Change-Id: Ib30b3a16f25de5def508d90ec9375563b1d4d384 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/33836 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
* flashchips.c: format block_erasers membersAlan Green2019-07-031-54/+102
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | To allow automated tools to manipulate flashchips.c, ensure all .block_erasers definitions have consistent formatting: - start with the opening brace on a new line. - ensure end brace indented exactly two tabs. SFDP-capable chip is the one exception to this rule as it has an empty block instead. Signed-off-by: Alan Green <avg@google.com> Change-Id: Ib168bdbbef4cf097109805de15c97ecc1f7915b3 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/33831 Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
* flashchips.c: Make end of line comments consistentAlan Green2019-07-021-21/+21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | To allow automated tools to manipulate flashchips.c, make end of line comment formatting more consistent. Specifically, this change moves the comma from end of line to immediately after the field value, before the commment. Signed-off-by: Alan Green <avg@google.com> Change-Id: Ic4f97454766eff640b26a6c6eca29dc56c34c444 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/33830 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
* flashchips.c: ATMEL->Atmel for consistencyAlan Green2019-07-021-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | Replace the single instance where a vendor name was spelled inconsistently. Signed-off-by: Alan Green <avg@google.com> Change-Id: I6478bc29f640f789f3b35e7b4816133f4a0d292e Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/33829 Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
* flashchips.c: Make whitespace consistentAlan Green2019-07-021-98/+101
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | For consistency, and to make the file amenable to manipulation by tools, use only tabs when indenting. Some previous changes had introduced spaces for indenting. Also ensure that every table entry is separated by a single blank line. Signed-off-by: Alan Green <avg@google.com> Change-Id: Ib2193798cc52641d6c443f8851903c749b31cb74 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/33828 Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
* Add support for MX25U25635FDavid Tomaschik2019-06-281-0/+49
| | | | | | | | | | | This is a 256Kb part with support for JEDEC 4 byte addressing modes. Tested successfully for probe/read. Change-Id: I5bdcd32acd1942edf65e50bce0f81c836095ee8c Signed-off-by: David Tomaschik <davidtomaschik@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/33639 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
* flashchips: Add Sanyo LE25FU206/A and LE25FU106BAngel Pons2018-11-011-0/+100
| | | | | | | | | | | As per user `The_Raven Raven` on the mailing list. Since the added values had some inconsistencies, the chips are marked as untested. Change-Id: I6c26aafdca232110986334e85297d73d513600dc Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/28813 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
* flashchips: Add IS25LP256 and IS25WP256David Hendricks2018-10-301-0/+100
| | | | | | | | | | | Tested IS25LP256 using Raspberry Pi and Dediprog SF600 programmers. Tested IS25WP256 using Dediprog SF600. Change-Id: Idf7a224abcde5f7935d9ef88309f78207de60a7a Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/29306 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
* flashchips: Add W25Q256JV supportDavid Hendricks2018-10-291-0/+47
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Similar to W25Q256FV, but it supports the native 4BA page program instruction (12h). Note that the variant with QE enabled by default shares the device ID of the W25Q256FV. Tested using a Raspberry Pi. Change-Id: I76d7362777d364594d2a733d7e478741b0bef7c4 Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/29305 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
* flashchips: Mark MX25L25635F as testedKasper Revsbech2018-10-231-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | As reported by Kasper Revsbech on 2018-10-19. Change-Id: Icf05288c4e7e34af2e3f4b951457df695078847d Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/29202 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
* flashchips: Add Macronix MX25U8032EAngel Pons2018-10-071-0/+40
| | | | | | | | | | As per `The_Raven Raven` on the mailing list. Change-Id: I422c3d51e5011e081ff6bccff294817c8c1765d0 Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/28821 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
* flashchips: Add W25Q128.V..WPatrick Rudolph2018-10-051-0/+37
| | | | | | | | | | | Port the code from chromeos flashrom. Tested using W25Q128JVSIM in SPI mode. Change-Id: I38397a0c831407afa21cddca8485664576fce92c Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/28910 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
* flashchips: Mark S25FL208K as testedNico Huber2018-10-041-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | As report by Frédéric Germain on 2017-12-17. Change-Id: I0a7fc10e75f4a675de41e9765525defe2d2640e4 Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/28883 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
* flashchips: Add ISSI IS25WP064 and IS25WP032Nico Huber2018-10-041-1/+86
| | | | | | | | | | | | The IS25WP064 was tested successfully by Simon Buhrow as reported on 2018-9-4. While we are at it, also add the 32Mbit version which shares the datasheet (as does the already supported 128Mbit version). Change-Id: Ie0887b4ae6e6465118a5dc2e20b784f783d161b8 Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/28884 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
* flashchips: Add ATMEL AT25SL128AHal Martin2018-10-031-0/+39
| | | | | | | | | Change-Id: I60c433ffe9e34663c2cfc608b8b76943cd92a8ba Signed-off-by: Hal Martin <hal.martin@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/26576 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
* Enable native 4BA instructions for Spansion 25FL256SNico Huber2018-10-031-1/+4
| | | | | | | | | Change-Id: I0ffc816ca714ecce5b89b1eaadb5e73ccb38d9ab Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de> Tested-by: Michael Fuckner <michael@fuckner.net> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/25134 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com>
* Enable 4BA mode for Spansion 25FL256SNico Huber2018-10-031-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | 4BA mode is entered by setting bit 7 for the extended address register. Change-Id: I807bf55d65763a9f48a6a3377f14f4e5288a7a4c Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de> Tested-by: Michael Fuckner <michael@fuckner.net> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/25133 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com>
* flashchips: Add Spansion 25FL256S......0Nico Huber2018-10-031-0/+42
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The Spansion 25SFL256S supports 4BA through an extended address register, a 4BA mode set by bit 7 of that register, or native 4BA instructions. Enable the former only for now. Unfortunately the S25SF256S uses another instruction to write the exten- ded address register. So we add an override for the instruction byte. Change-Id: I0a95a81dfe86434f049215ebd8477392391b9efc Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de> Tested-by: Michael Fuckner <michael@fuckner.net> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/25132 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com>
* flashchips: Mark Spansion S25FL128P......0 as testedAngel Pons2018-10-031-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | Tested with a Spansion FL128PIF. Change-Id: Ic99eabb67d5bce3910e9275d0056a7cfa8cff36f Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/28866 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
* flashchips: Mark Atmel AT45DB081D as testedAngel Pons2018-10-031-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | As per `The_Raven Raven` on the mailing list. Change-Id: I225984b9e2589713f25d0f9b49eb1c3abdcff3cd Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/28825 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
* flashchips: Mark Winbond W25Q40BW as testedAngel Pons2018-10-031-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | As per `The_Raven Raven` on the mailing list. The tested chip was `W25Q40.W`, but it was later renamed to `W25Q40BW` when the `W25Q40EW` was added. Change-Id: I624adef2c5b4dd83f0ce93d6069e315fc407db19 Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/28824 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
* flashchips: Mark PMC Pm25LD040 as testedAngel Pons2018-10-031-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | As per `The_Raven Raven` on the mailing list. Change-Id: Ied8d07c54f8a222dbe05503f859f82bba27d8336 Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/28823 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
* flashchips: Mark Sanyo LE25FU406C as testedAngel Pons2018-10-031-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | As per `The_Raven Raven` on the mailing list. Change-Id: I1dba38d03c826a53bff3ddad0aa536032c5532a1 Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/28822 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
* flashchips: Mark PMC Pm25LD020 as testedAngel Pons2018-10-031-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | As per `The_Raven Raven` on the mailing list. Change-Id: I16d5a207599b434fe52b42709e42f1f32a8e6698 Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/28820 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
* flashchips: Mark GigaDevice GD25Q128C as testedAngel Pons2018-10-031-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | As per Tomasz Walach on the mailing list. Change-Id: Ib0d7485c7221f92ec13995c58065a48e08f57cd8 Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/28819 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
* flashchips: Mark AMIC A25L40PU as testedAngel Pons2018-10-031-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | As per Stefan Szwarnowski on the mailing list. Change-Id: I574094bdb83611a3cda2fcc455bcf9aed3774011 Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/28818 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
* flashchips: Mark Winbond W25Q256.V as testedAngel Pons2018-10-031-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | As per Richard Hughes via the mailing list. Change-Id: Ic562a65d1a7d394f9d2c3980833d10a87bd9358a Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/28816 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
* flashchips: Mark Macronix MX66L51235 as testedAngel Pons2018-10-031-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | As per Nick (cel366) on 2018-05-16 via mailing list. Change-Id: I44363e6755167adbc120444a481b09bb4e1063c5 Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/28815 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
* flashchips: Mark Atmel AT25DF161 as testedAngel Pons2018-10-031-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | As per Konstantin on 2018-06-08 via mailing list. Change-Id: I75fb4b17cf330451489811ae9303cbb33ebcb183 Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/28814 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2024-05-28 01:55:33 +0000