summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/flashchips.h
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* flashchips: Add MX25L12833FTao Xia2021-08-241-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | Just add the name to the existing entry, as usual it is supposed to be compatible. Signed-off-by: Tao Xia <xiatao5@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com> Change-Id: I14ab7e04f5209d2bcf34b0d2de9da2c01bf32d00 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/56546 Reviewed-by: Weimin Wu <wuweimin@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
* flashchips: Add MX25L12873FNico Huber2021-07-141-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | Just add the name to the existing entry, as usual it is supposed to be compatible. Change-Id: I59c8067f15b5ceac5a2e2f8fe93431a465f17e23 Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/56054 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
* flashchips: Add support for Macronix MX66L1G45GPatrick Rudolph2021-06-201-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | Tested on Dediprog SF600: Reading and writing works. Change-Id: I554e828c97d9ec77b08489573a34e176599d2518 Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/55353 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
* flashchips: change chip name from 'W25Q64JW' to 'W25Q64JW...M'Nikolai Artemiev2021-06-101-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | According to the W25Q64JW datasheet rev. E, only devices ending with the letter 'M' have a device ID of 8017h. There are other variants with different device IDs. This patch makes the 'W25Q64JW...M' definition consistent with the 'W25Q32JW...M' definition. The device ID macro defined in flashchips.h has also been renamed from WINBOND_NEX_W25Q64JW to WINBOND_NEX_W25Q64JW_M. BUG=b:166294558 BRANCH=none TEST=builds Change-Id: Ib0dc914da286a191d22e666332b1063b88db4251 Signed-off-by: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/54291 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
* flashchips.c: add support for W25Q32JW...MNikolai Artemiev2021-06-101-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The chip was added to cros flashrom in `commit 1fc77dd1ee27a5d6e58a82c6ed6ed390a15372d7`. Quoting from the commit message: > We have varied the correct chip name is reported as well as > write and read 16MBytes of random data and verified the checksum's match. > Further, --wp-list appears to report the correct ranges. > > BUG=b:130199963 > BRANCH=none > TEST=Ran flashrom with a Dediprog SF100, RW random data and checksum matched. Change-Id: I7425e12658dd69c4ec8d3309dd591d09a935bb4d Signed-off-by: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/53946 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com>
* flashchips: Add MX25L3233FNico Huber2021-04-251-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | Only mattering difference to the MX25L3273E seems to be the voltage range (starting at 2.65V instead of 2.7V). I don't think that would justify yet another entry. Change-Id: I73402dddedf360ab84caed4c019efe27b477d4c2 Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.huber@secunet.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/52570 Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
* flashchips: Add support for Boya/BoHong Microelectronics B_25D16AChristian Kudera2021-04-241-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | Read tested on CH341A Change-Id: I25b776204affda94cc7e753e7671ef9d3d9508f1 Signed-off-by: Christian Kudera <coreboot@kudera.at> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/52555 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
* flashchips: Adapt IDs for Boya MicroelectronicsAngel Pons2021-04-241-3/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | Looks like BoHong Microelectronics has the same vendor ID and makes very similar chips. For instance, Boya BY25Q128AS and BoHong BH25Q128AS have the same specifications and their datasheets are mostly identical. Change-Id: I8d6951797daeeecca6af200c995297c0394adefd Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/52550 Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
* Add support for Adesto AT25SF128AEdward O'Callaghan2021-02-281-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The following adds support for the Adesto AT25SF128A-SHB-T part. We have varied the correct chip name is reported as well as write and read 16MBytes of random data and verified the checksum's match. Further, --wp-list appears to report the correct ranges. BUG=None BRANCH=none TEST=Ran flashrom with a Dediprog SF100, RW random data and checksum matched. Original-Change-Id: Ic22ca588f33753fdf492e8445324bcc0a809d3e2 Original-Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1593201 Original-Commit-Ready: ChromeOS CL Exonerator Bot <chromiumos-cl-exonerator@appspot.gserviceaccount.com> Original-Tested-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 1fa87e058b72a2de1e9127a45e9978361de48479) Note: this does not include the changes made to writeprotect.c in the original patch, as they depend on a large amount of additional writeprotect code that is currently only present in the cros tree, and the intention here is just to reduce the diff in flashchips.c. The `.wp` field has also been removed. Change-Id: I1ce2a6699a1f0116306f668123673a1ba9c932d2 Signed-off-by: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/51097 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
* flashchips.c: Add support for XMC new SPI flash typesluke he2021-01-021-1/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Adds initial support for the follow SPI flash chips: XM25QU64C XM25QU128C XM25QU256C XM25QH64C XM25QH128C XM25QH256C BUG=none TEST=builds Signed-off-by: Luke He <sixuerain@qq.com> Change-Id: I15c51b0f1ed789bcb2cabe33bc830f8d5d916969 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/48949 Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
* flashchips.c: add Spansion chipsNikolai Artemiev2020-12-031-0/+9
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Adds support for the following chips: - S25FL128S - S25FL129P - S25FL256S - S25FS128S - {F,S,V}29C51001B Chips imported from cros flashrom at `9c4c9a56b6a0370b383df9c75d71b3bd469e672d`. BUG=b:153800073 TEST=builds Signed-off-by: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev@google.com> Change-Id: If6b23ad2e65258143e0045133828d9db119fb665 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/46064 Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
* flashchips: Add support for Boya Microelectronics BY25Q128ASJack Olsen2020-11-201-0/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | Tested on Buspirate. Signed-off-by: Jack Olsen <omegasec@tutanota.com> Change-Id: I881ba86cfaa82e43c73360135d47c74d896cc191 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/44308 Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
* flashchips: Add support for Fudan SPI flash chipsJakob Petersson2020-10-231-0/+10
| | | | | | | | | | | Signed-off-by: Jakob Petersson <github@jakobpetersson.se> Change-Id: I8045ecb8778fd6111fcccc075e69928f131a926a Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/46513 Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev@google.com> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
* flashchips: Add W25Q256JW_DTRDavid Hendricks2020-08-191-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | W25Q256JW currently has two variants, the W25Q256JW with device ID 0x6019 added in commit be4682d and the W25Q256JW_DTR (aka W25Q256JW-IM) with device ID 0x8019 added by this patch. Winbond W25Q256-series chips have a few device IDs: 0x4019: W25Q256FV 0x6019: W25Q256JW 0x7019: W25Q256JV 0x8019: W25Q256JW_DTR Hence we need to be more specific with naming than usual to avoid a false positive with wildcards. Change-Id: I50a6de2c915f9201c458378fcc49130ead73d8c4 Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/42386 Reviewed-by: Simon Buhrow Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
* flashchips: Add support for Macronix MX25L5121ESteve Markgraf2020-08-041-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | Tested with ch341a_spi. Change-Id: I881e2cda938083ba271b2ee0c457d2bbd8e1a766 Signed-off-by: Steve Markgraf <steve@steve-m.de> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/43416 Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
* Add support for Winbond W25X05CLJacob Appelbaum2020-07-261-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | This commit adds support for the Winbond W25X05CL SPI flash chip. The Winbond W25X05CL is a 512Kib (64 KiB) SPI flash chip with 4KiB sectors. I have tested this patch with a Bus Pirate (v3b) and an in-circuit W25X05CL flash chip using a test clip. Reading, erasing, and writing all function as expected. Change-Id: I19c33c7da374f0263f30577a10a0f0f1afa4febc Signed-off-by: Jacob Appelbaum <jacob@appelbaum.net> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/43573 Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
* flashchips: Add W25Q256.Wel-coderon2020-06-161-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | Nicklas Lennert wrote me via the flashrom mailing list that he successfully ran read, write and verify cmd. Signed-off-by: Simon Buhrow <simon.buhrow@posteo.de> Change-Id: I3608945a38b5ed42b8b2b9b2b388cdea97141d7b Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/40855 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com>
* Revert "flashchips: port S25FS(128S) chip from chromiumos"Nico Huber2020-05-011-2/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This reverts commit a3519561bd0fb44153bb376322b799000657576f. Breaks support for most SPI flash chips. It's too big and too invasive to be reviewed as a single commit. The changes to `spi_poll_wip():spi25.c` were not noticed in the original review that were from the similarly named function and file `s25f_poll_status():s25f.c` in the downstream Chromium fork. V.2: Rebase and rephrase commit msg to reflect how the issue slipped in. Change-Id: Id2a4593bdb654f8a26957d69d52189ce61621d93 Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/40626 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Shiyu Sun <sshiyu@google.com> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
* flashchips: port S25FS(128S) chip from chromiumossibradzic2020-04-221-0/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This may seem too big just to support yet another flash chip, but in reality it brings support for whole new family of S25FS Spansion/Cypress flash chips. These chips require handling of some special status registers for erasing or writing, with very specific timing checks in place. For example, WIP status bit will remain being set to 1 if erase or programming errors occur, and in that case chip 'software reset' has to be performed otherwise the chip will remain unresponsive to all further commands. Also, special CR3NV register (Configuration Register 3 Nonvolatile) status bits needs to be read and set by using RDAR (ReaD Any Register) and WRAR (WRite Any Register) OP commands, and these states are needed to determine which type of reset feature is enabled at the time (legacy or S25FS type) in the first place, determine whether Uniform or Hybrid sector architecture is used at the time, or set programming buffer address wrap point (256 or 512 bytes). Furthermore, S25FS chip status register has to be restored to its original state (hence that ugly CHIP_RESTORE_CALLBACK) following erasing or writing, failing to do so may result in host being unable to access data on the chip at all. Finally, although this brings support for the whole family of chips, I only have one such chip to do the actual testing, S25FS128S (Small Sectors), which I had fully tested on ch341a and FT4232H programmers, with confirmed working probe, read, erase and write. Full summary of changes are here: flashchips: add new flashchip sctructure property: .reset add chip definitions: S25FS128S Large Sectors S25FS128S Small Sectors flash: add macro (chip_restore_func_data call-back): CHIP_RESTORE_CALLBACK flashrom: add struct: chip_restore_func_data add call-back function: register_chip_restore spi: add OP codes: CMD_RDAR, CMD_WRAR, CMD_WRAR_LEN, CMD_RSTEN, CMD_RST add register bit function definitions: CR3NV_ADDR, CR3NV_20H_NV add timers: T_W, T_RPH, T_SE spi25: refactor (based on chromiumos implementation) function: spi_poll_wip port these functions from chromiumos: probe_spi_big_spansion s25fs_software_reset s25f_legacy_software_reset s25fs_block_erase_d8 spi25_statusreg: port these functions from chromiumos: spi_restore_status s25fs_read_cr s25fs_write_cr s25fs_restore_cr3nv Most of the ported functions are originally from s25f.c found at https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/flashrom with exception of spi_restore_status which is defined in spi25_statusreg.c. The rest of macros and OP codes are defined in same files as in this commit. Change-Id: If659290874a4b9db6e71256bdef382d31b288e72 Signed-off-by: Samir Ibradzic <sibradzic@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/39822 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
* flashchips: Add support for Winbond W25Q64JWScott Chao2020-04-091-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | BUG=b:153515968 BRANCH=kukui TEST=flash coreboot on kakadu and get successful result. Change-Id: I8637129421a3b0f96bd8dffa4f50783ea6931967 Signed-off-by: Scott Chao <scott.chao@bitland.corp-partner.google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/40275 Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org> Tested-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
* flashchips: Add W25Q512JVJoel Stanley2020-04-081-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | https://www.winbond.com/resource-files/W25Q512JV%20DTR%20RevB%2006132019%20133.pdf Tested with dediprog SF100. Change-Id: I8d16f0918785795cc49500435a03641b87d706e9 Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/34595 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
* flashchips: add support for GigaDevice GD25WQ80EDino Li2020-03-251-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Support GD25WQ80E, which is the internal flash of IT81202. TEST=Building flashrom and flashing FW image into IT81202 successfully. Change-Id: Ib5feaa6ecc7b11b2218e5f02c087b4331388bef8 Signed-off-by: Dino Li <Dino.Li@ite.com.tw> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/39820 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
* flashchips: Add Macronix MX25R3235Fsibradzic2020-03-241-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 32Mbit (4MiB) [x1/x2/x4] Wide Voltage Range (VCC 1.65V-3.6V). It is similar to the already-supported MX25R6435F, but the total size is halved. Tested on ch341a, FT4232H and FT2232H (PicoTAP) programmers, confirmed working probe, read, erase and write. Fixes: https://github.com/flashrom/flashrom/issues/43 Change-Id: I6e79115adba17d13d24bc85d78707d53fd4a0be5 Signed-off-by: Samir Ibradzic <sibradzic@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/39532 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
* Fix typosCarl-Daniel Hailfinger2020-01-201-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net> Change-Id: Ia5ed00c488b0719b2bdd6c8f304900511684f445 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/38477 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
* flashchips: Add AT25SF321darkarnium2019-12-141-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This commit adds support for the Adesto AT25SF321 SPI flash chip. Probe and read operations have been tested via FT2232H interface, but writes have not been verified. Datasheet is available at the following URL: https://www.adestotech.com/wp-content/uploads/DS-AT25SF321_047.pdf Change-Id: I7410815e063ffe154a97d7ea5881c8eb82025f56 Signed-off-by: Peter Adkins <pete@kernelpicnic.net> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/36904 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com>
* flashchips: Add W25Q128JW_DTRPeichao Wang2019-11-131-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Port the code from chromeos flashrom BUG=b:144297264 TEST=Tested using W25Q128JWDTR in SPI mode Signed-off-by: Peichao.Wang <peichao.wang@bitland.corp-partner.google.com> Change-Id: Ifc28878b17dc10da2cfd8f82fffbd57adb22799e Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/36717 Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
* flashchips: Add missing N25Q/MT25Q variantsJacob Creedon2019-11-111-7/+10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This adds missing voltage and capacity variants for N25Q and MT25Q series devices. This also fixes a typo in some model numbers where the last letter should have been a G instead of an E. Added devices include: N25Q256..1E N25Q512..1G N25Q00A..1G N25Q00A..3G MT25QU128 MT25QL128 MT25QU256 MT25QU512 tested by Jacob Creedon <jcreedon@google.com> MT25QL01G tested by Konstantin Grudnev <grudnevkv@gmail.com> MT25QU01G MT25QL02G MT25QU02G Two have been tested as indicated, all other variants added are marked untested. Signed-off-by: Jacob Creedon <jcreedon@google.com> Change-Id: I85630e4f6c0aa3b261f9871b7d363dad278b997e Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/34491 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
* Add support for M95M02-A125Konstantin Grudnev2019-10-041-0/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | Automotive 2 Mbit (256KiB) serial SPI bus EEPROM PREW tested successfully with use of ch341a programmer on Linux host 5.2.0-1-MANJARO x86_64 Signed-off-by: Konstantin Grudnev <grudnevkv@gmail.com> Change-Id: Ic29cd9051c7eac4822d620c299834134f987f01b Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/34496 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
* flashchips.c: Add GD25Q256D from downstreamAlan Green2019-09-241-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Take definition of GD25Q256D from ChromiumOS repository. This chip was added in `commit 0c38355c` by dlaurie@google.com 2019-03-17. Signed-off-by: Alan Green <avg@google.com> Change-Id: I79d4ed48aa9126a8a6ce455a9564451346195b8f Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/35480 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
* flashchips: upstream changes to GD25LQ128Alan Green2019-08-211-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Change name of GD25LQ128 to GD25LQ128CD. This is an upstreaming of the change from the chromium flashrom repo SHA 6c957d745f5d3dcadd1035734a5cf1b804bd0f2f (Also visible at https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromiumos/third_party/flashrom/+/1181175) The rationale from that change was: The GD25LQ128C part is EOL. It's replacement is GD25LQ128D, but both chips identify in the same manner. Add GD25LQ128D to the name of the part so that it doesn't confused people. Making this name consistent will simplify further merging from the chromium fork. Change-Id: I57804f1a33170668e029a7b08ac050d9a3bd6dbb Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/34735 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
* flashchips: Add Macronix MX25L51245G as known chipHemanth Guruva Reddy2019-07-171-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | MX25L51245G is identical to handling of MX66L51235F. Change-Id: I964e630197e33d69b199fdfb8816f18e3112bbb1 Signed-off-by: Hemanth Guruva Reddy <meethemanth@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/34234 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
* flashchips: Drop dead code of AT26DF321Alan Green2019-07-041-1/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The definition for the AT26DF321 has been commented out since it was first added in 2008. The chip now appears to be obsolete, being marked "obsolete" and unstocked at Digikey. It is also only referred to in historical documents on the manufacturer's website (microchip.com). To avoid further bitrot of this dead code, drop it. Signed-off-by: Alan Green <avg@google.com> Change-Id: Ib30b3a16f25de5def508d90ec9375563b1d4d384 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/33836 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
* flashchips: Add Sanyo LE25FU206/A and LE25FU106BAngel Pons2018-11-011-0/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | As per user `The_Raven Raven` on the mailing list. Since the added values had some inconsistencies, the chips are marked as untested. Change-Id: I6c26aafdca232110986334e85297d73d513600dc Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/28813 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
* flashchips: Add IS25LP256 and IS25WP256David Hendricks2018-10-301-0/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | Tested IS25LP256 using Raspberry Pi and Dediprog SF600 programmers. Tested IS25WP256 using Dediprog SF600. Change-Id: Idf7a224abcde5f7935d9ef88309f78207de60a7a Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/29306 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
* flashchips: Add W25Q256JV supportDavid Hendricks2018-10-291-1/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Similar to W25Q256FV, but it supports the native 4BA page program instruction (12h). Note that the variant with QE enabled by default shares the device ID of the W25Q256FV. Tested using a Raspberry Pi. Change-Id: I76d7362777d364594d2a733d7e478741b0bef7c4 Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/29305 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
* flashchips: Add Macronix MX25U8032EAngel Pons2018-10-071-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | As per `The_Raven Raven` on the mailing list. Change-Id: I422c3d51e5011e081ff6bccff294817c8c1765d0 Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/28821 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
* flashchips: Add W25Q128.V..WPatrick Rudolph2018-10-051-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | Port the code from chromeos flashrom. Tested using W25Q128JVSIM in SPI mode. Change-Id: I38397a0c831407afa21cddca8485664576fce92c Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/28910 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
* flashchips: Add ISSI IS25WP064 and IS25WP032Nico Huber2018-10-041-0/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | The IS25WP064 was tested successfully by Simon Buhrow as reported on 2018-9-4. While we are at it, also add the 32Mbit version which shares the datasheet (as does the already supported 128Mbit version). Change-Id: Ie0887b4ae6e6465118a5dc2e20b784f783d161b8 Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/28884 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
* flashchips: Add ATMEL AT25SL128AHal Martin2018-10-031-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | Change-Id: I60c433ffe9e34663c2cfc608b8b76943cd92a8ba Signed-off-by: Hal Martin <hal.martin@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/26576 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
* flashchips: Add ISSI IS25LP064Angel Pons2018-10-031-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | Grabbed from mailing list, created by Simon Buhrow. Since no logs were attached, the chip is marked as untested. Change-Id: Idc26162fc5a5a429acef546b30b12d8b1f195e0a Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/28809 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
* Add support for MX25R6435FNathan Rennie-Waldock2018-08-171-0/+2
| | | | | | | | | Change-Id: I664ffce6f9aa7544e17b516a1b4179d561208b2f Signed-off-by: Nathan Rennie-Waldock <nathan.renniewaldock@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/28004 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
* flashchips: Add Macronix MX25U51245GDaniel Thompson2018-08-171-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Copy 'n paste support for Macronix MX25U51245G. I don't pretend to know a whole lot about SPI FLASH so its mostly copied from other MX25U devices and double checked a few bits and pieces against the datasheet. I have tested basic probe, read, erase and write using layout files. I tested both with 4MB@0x0000000 and 64K0@0x3f00000 (the later means I have tested 4-byte addressing). Change-Id: I2117fc205006088967f3d97644375d10db1791f1 Signed-off-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/26949 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
* Remove unneeded white spacesElyes HAOUAS2018-06-241-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | Change-Id: I90f171924790ced74a62ca344fee8607607aa480 Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/26652 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
* Add support for AT25DF021ASteffen Mauch2018-06-061-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | This is the low-voltage version of the AT25DF021. Tested with FT2232H Mini Module Change-Id: If4990e6856c8b77567ef4218459cf754b9c6bc57 Signed-off-by: Steffen Mauch <steffen.mauch@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/26856 Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
* Add support for the AT25SF081Evan Jensen2018-06-041-1/+2
| | | | | | | | Change-Id: I1a3d900462ad9e7a3b34575d7c98acc7c2df0445 Signed-off-by: Evan Jensen <evan.p.jensen@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/26779 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com>
* flashchips: Add Winbond 25Q40EW and rename 25Q40.WNico Huber2018-05-061-1/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | Same story as for 25Q80BW/EW, 25Q40EW has a new ID and the only known chip with the old ID is the BW variant. Change-Id: Ib610b0d6f3a5561b2ac3505ef15bdee8b0edae25 Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/25462 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com>
* flashchips: Add SST26VF016B(A), SST26VF032B(A), SST26VF064B(A)Wei Hu2018-05-061-0/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch seems to have originally been from https://patchwork.coreboot.org/patch/4126/ . The most recent version seems to be in OpenEmbedded (commit 503a572) which added support for 16Mbit and 32Mbit variants. The OpenEmbedded patch also makes changes to linux_spi.c to add some debug prints which are omitted in this version. From the original commit message: Differences between SST26 and SST25: 1. The WREN instruction must be executed prior to WRSR [Section 5.31]. There is no EWSR. 2. Block protection bits are no longer in the status register. There is a dedicated 144-bit register [Table 5-6]. The device is write-protected by default. A Global Block-Protection Unlock command unlocks the entire memory [Section 4.1]. Change-Id: Ib019bed8ce955049703eb3376c32a83ef607c219 Signed-off-by: Wei Hu <wei@aristanetworks.com> Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner@student.tuwien.ac.at> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/25962 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
* Remove address from GPLv2 headersElyes HAOUAS2018-04-241-4/+0
| | | | | | | | Change-Id: I7bfc339673cbf5ee2d2ff7564c4db04ca088d0a4 Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/25381 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
* Fix whitespace errorsElyes HAOUAS2018-04-241-1/+1
| | | | | | | | Change-Id: Ic2d3bb9d8581a0471a8568a130f893b34dddf113 Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/25380 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
* flashchips: W25Q80.W --> W25Q80BWDavid Hendricks2018-03-281-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | The W25Q80BW appears to have been succeeded by the W25Q80EW which has a different manufacturer ID but is otherwise similar. Consequently, W25Q80.W no longer matches all chips in this family. This patch makes the original entry specific to W25Q80BW. Change-Id: I2980272c2691eb62a68056a7a4c308e9b4810347 Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendricks@fb.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/25100 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2024-05-23 14:18:53 +0000