summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPaul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>2020-04-28 09:59:02 -0400
committerBen Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>2020-06-11 19:05:39 +0100
commit9592b90cdc99f58e0674e64037c422ea7e9aa367 (patch)
tree754df8d4d3b1c25c0630292a8fb77c6b30b3251f
parent976dc007c4fde824b46cd40d001a17734ce9e333 (diff)
downloadlinux-stable-9592b90cdc99f58e0674e64037c422ea7e9aa367.tar.gz
linux-stable-9592b90cdc99f58e0674e64037c422ea7e9aa367.tar.bz2
linux-stable-9592b90cdc99f58e0674e64037c422ea7e9aa367.zip
selinux: properly handle multiple messages in selinux_netlink_send()
commit fb73974172ffaaf57a7c42f35424d9aece1a5af6 upstream. Fix the SELinux netlink_send hook to properly handle multiple netlink messages in a single sk_buff; each message is parsed and subject to SELinux access control. Prior to this patch, SELinux only inspected the first message in the sk_buff. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> [bwh: Backported to 3.16: adjust context] Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
-rw-r--r--security/selinux/hooks.c68
1 files changed, 44 insertions, 24 deletions
diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c
index 5b8353183cd1..84f4a4e9e2ba 100644
--- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
+++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
@@ -4669,39 +4669,59 @@ static int selinux_tun_dev_open(void *security)
static int selinux_nlmsg_perm(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
- int err = 0;
- u32 perm;
+ int rc = 0;
+ unsigned int msg_len;
+ unsigned int data_len = skb->len;
+ unsigned char *data = skb->data;
struct nlmsghdr *nlh;
struct sk_security_struct *sksec = sk->sk_security;
+ u16 sclass = sksec->sclass;
+ u32 perm;
- if (skb->len < NLMSG_HDRLEN) {
- err = -EINVAL;
- goto out;
- }
- nlh = nlmsg_hdr(skb);
+ while (data_len >= nlmsg_total_size(0)) {
+ nlh = (struct nlmsghdr *)data;
- err = selinux_nlmsg_lookup(sksec->sclass, nlh->nlmsg_type, &perm);
- if (err) {
- if (err == -EINVAL) {
+ /* NOTE: the nlmsg_len field isn't reliably set by some netlink
+ * users which means we can't reject skb's with bogus
+ * length fields; our solution is to follow what
+ * netlink_rcv_skb() does and simply skip processing at
+ * messages with length fields that are clearly junk
+ */
+ if (nlh->nlmsg_len < NLMSG_HDRLEN || nlh->nlmsg_len > data_len)
+ return 0;
+
+ rc = selinux_nlmsg_lookup(sclass, nlh->nlmsg_type, &perm);
+ if (rc == 0) {
+ rc = sock_has_perm(current, sk, perm);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+ } else if (rc == -EINVAL) {
+ /* -EINVAL is a missing msg/perm mapping */
pr_warn_ratelimited("SELinux: unrecognized netlink"
- " message: protocol=%hu nlmsg_type=%hu sclass=%s"
- " pig=%d comm=%s\n",
- sk->sk_protocol, nlh->nlmsg_type,
- secclass_map[sksec->sclass - 1].name,
- task_pid_nr(current), current->comm);
- if (!selinux_enforcing || security_get_allow_unknown())
- err = 0;
+ " message: protocol=%hu nlmsg_type=%hu sclass=%s"
+ " pid=%d comm=%s\n",
+ sk->sk_protocol, nlh->nlmsg_type,
+ secclass_map[sclass - 1].name,
+ task_pid_nr(current), current->comm);
+ if (selinux_enforcing && !security_get_allow_unknown())
+ return rc;
+ rc = 0;
+ } else if (rc == -ENOENT) {
+ /* -ENOENT is a missing socket/class mapping, ignore */
+ rc = 0;
+ } else {
+ return rc;
}
- /* Ignore */
- if (err == -ENOENT)
- err = 0;
- goto out;
+ /* move to the next message after applying netlink padding */
+ msg_len = NLMSG_ALIGN(nlh->nlmsg_len);
+ if (msg_len >= data_len)
+ return 0;
+ data_len -= msg_len;
+ data += msg_len;
}
- err = sock_has_perm(current, sk, perm);
-out:
- return err;
+ return rc;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_NETFILTER