summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>2007-11-15 20:57:40 +0100
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>2007-11-15 20:57:40 +0100
commitce96b5ac742801718ae86d2adf0500c5abef3782 (patch)
tree1ec0bc7d105af9adc3836a5f47a0f9f62031d14f
parentdae51f56204d33444f61d9e7af3ee70aef55daa4 (diff)
downloadlinux-stable-ce96b5ac742801718ae86d2adf0500c5abef3782.tar.gz
linux-stable-ce96b5ac742801718ae86d2adf0500c5abef3782.tar.bz2
linux-stable-ce96b5ac742801718ae86d2adf0500c5abef3782.zip
sched: fix __set_task_cpu() SMP race
Grant Wilson has reported rare SCHED_FAIR_USER crashes on his quad-core system, which crashes can only be explained via runqueue corruption. there is a narrow SMP race in __set_task_cpu(): after ->cpu is set up to a new value, task_rq_lock(p, ...) can be successfuly executed on another CPU. We must ensure that updates of per-task data have been completed by this moment. this bug has been hiding in the Linux scheduler for an eternity (we never had any explicit barrier for task->cpu in set_task_cpu() - so the bug was introduced in 2.5.1), but only became visible via set_task_cfs_rq() being accidentally put after the task->cpu update. It also probably needs a sufficiently out-of-order CPU to trigger. Reported-by: Grant Wilson <grant.wilson@zen.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-rw-r--r--kernel/sched.c20
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index d62b759753f3..db1f71e31310 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -216,15 +216,15 @@ static inline struct task_group *task_group(struct task_struct *p)
}
/* Change a task's cfs_rq and parent entity if it moves across CPUs/groups */
-static inline void set_task_cfs_rq(struct task_struct *p)
+static inline void set_task_cfs_rq(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int cpu)
{
- p->se.cfs_rq = task_group(p)->cfs_rq[task_cpu(p)];
- p->se.parent = task_group(p)->se[task_cpu(p)];
+ p->se.cfs_rq = task_group(p)->cfs_rq[cpu];
+ p->se.parent = task_group(p)->se[cpu];
}
#else
-static inline void set_task_cfs_rq(struct task_struct *p) { }
+static inline void set_task_cfs_rq(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int cpu) { }
#endif /* CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED */
@@ -1022,10 +1022,16 @@ unsigned long weighted_cpuload(const int cpu)
static inline void __set_task_cpu(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int cpu)
{
+ set_task_cfs_rq(p, cpu);
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+ /*
+ * After ->cpu is set up to a new value, task_rq_lock(p, ...) can be
+ * successfuly executed on another CPU. We must ensure that updates of
+ * per-task data have been completed by this moment.
+ */
+ smp_wmb();
task_thread_info(p)->cpu = cpu;
#endif
- set_task_cfs_rq(p);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
@@ -7088,7 +7094,7 @@ void sched_move_task(struct task_struct *tsk)
rq = task_rq_lock(tsk, &flags);
if (tsk->sched_class != &fair_sched_class) {
- set_task_cfs_rq(tsk);
+ set_task_cfs_rq(tsk, task_cpu(tsk));
goto done;
}
@@ -7103,7 +7109,7 @@ void sched_move_task(struct task_struct *tsk)
tsk->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, tsk);
}
- set_task_cfs_rq(tsk);
+ set_task_cfs_rq(tsk, task_cpu(tsk));
if (on_rq) {
if (unlikely(running))