diff options
| author | Calvin Owens <calvinowens@fb.com> | 2017-12-08 09:05:26 -0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2017-12-08 14:07:19 -0500 |
| commit | 2edbdb3159d6f6bd3a9b6e7f789f2b879699a519 (patch) | |
| tree | 5a96df370542a4a4ad8c8ae18ad91e1b38114b8f | |
| parent | b25b3e2fd9ca9b7907a53baf46dea4074ed5e062 (diff) | |
| download | linux-stable-2edbdb3159d6f6bd3a9b6e7f789f2b879699a519.tar.gz linux-stable-2edbdb3159d6f6bd3a9b6e7f789f2b879699a519.tar.bz2 linux-stable-2edbdb3159d6f6bd3a9b6e7f789f2b879699a519.zip | |
bnxt_en: Fix sources of spurious netpoll warnings
After applying 2270bc5da3497945 ("bnxt_en: Fix netpoll handling") and
903649e718f80da2 ("bnxt_en: Improve -ENOMEM logic in NAPI poll loop."),
we still see the following WARN fire:
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1875170 at net/core/netpoll.c:165 netpoll_poll_dev+0x15a/0x160
bnxt_poll+0x0/0xd0 exceeded budget in poll
<snip>
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff814be5cd>] dump_stack+0x4d/0x70
[<ffffffff8107e013>] __warn+0xd3/0xf0
[<ffffffff8107e07f>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x4f/0x60
[<ffffffff8179519a>] netpoll_poll_dev+0x15a/0x160
[<ffffffff81795f38>] netpoll_send_skb_on_dev+0x168/0x250
[<ffffffff817962fc>] netpoll_send_udp+0x2dc/0x440
[<ffffffff815fa9be>] write_ext_msg+0x20e/0x250
[<ffffffff810c8125>] call_console_drivers.constprop.23+0xa5/0x110
[<ffffffff810c9549>] console_unlock+0x339/0x5b0
[<ffffffff810c9a88>] vprintk_emit+0x2c8/0x450
[<ffffffff810c9d5f>] vprintk_default+0x1f/0x30
[<ffffffff81173df5>] printk+0x48/0x50
[<ffffffffa0197713>] edac_raw_mc_handle_error+0x563/0x5c0 [edac_core]
[<ffffffffa0197b9b>] edac_mc_handle_error+0x42b/0x6e0 [edac_core]
[<ffffffffa01c3a60>] sbridge_mce_output_error+0x410/0x10d0 [sb_edac]
[<ffffffffa01c47cc>] sbridge_check_error+0xac/0x130 [sb_edac]
[<ffffffffa0197f3c>] edac_mc_workq_function+0x3c/0x90 [edac_core]
[<ffffffff81095f8b>] process_one_work+0x19b/0x480
[<ffffffff810967ca>] worker_thread+0x6a/0x520
[<ffffffff8109c7c4>] kthread+0xe4/0x100
[<ffffffff81884c52>] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x40
This happens because we increment rx_pkts on -ENOMEM and -EIO, resulting
in rx_pkts > 0. Fix this by only bumping rx_pkts if we were actually
given a non-zero budget.
Signed-off-by: Calvin Owens <calvinowens@fb.com>
Acked-by: Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c index 28f5e94274ee..61ca4eb7c6fa 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c @@ -1883,7 +1883,7 @@ static int bnxt_poll_work(struct bnxt *bp, struct bnxt_napi *bnapi, int budget) * here forever if we consistently cannot allocate * buffers. */ - else if (rc == -ENOMEM) + else if (rc == -ENOMEM && budget) rx_pkts++; else if (rc == -EBUSY) /* partial completion */ break; @@ -1969,7 +1969,7 @@ static int bnxt_poll_nitroa0(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget) cpu_to_le32(RX_CMPL_ERRORS_CRC_ERROR); rc = bnxt_rx_pkt(bp, bnapi, &raw_cons, &event); - if (likely(rc == -EIO)) + if (likely(rc == -EIO) && budget) rx_pkts++; else if (rc == -EBUSY) /* partial completion */ break; |