diff options
author | Isaac J. Manjarres <isaacm@codeaurora.org> | 2018-07-17 12:35:29 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2018-07-25 11:25:08 +0200 |
commit | 2610e88946632afb78aa58e61f11368ac4c0af7b (patch) | |
tree | f59f8375399a2f3c145051a73654d5f443f3e7eb | |
parent | 6cd0c583b04b2bd9415e07b51b63ab799949dd66 (diff) | |
download | linux-stable-2610e88946632afb78aa58e61f11368ac4c0af7b.tar.gz linux-stable-2610e88946632afb78aa58e61f11368ac4c0af7b.tar.bz2 linux-stable-2610e88946632afb78aa58e61f11368ac4c0af7b.zip |
stop_machine: Disable preemption after queueing stopper threads
This commit:
9fb8d5dc4b64 ("stop_machine, Disable preemption when waking two stopper threads")
does not fully address the race condition that can occur
as follows:
On one CPU, call it CPU 3, thread 1 invokes
cpu_stop_queue_two_works(2, 3,...), and the execution is such
that thread 1 queues the works for migration/2 and migration/3,
and is preempted after releasing the locks for migration/2 and
migration/3, but before waking the threads.
Then, On CPU 2, a kworker, call it thread 2, is running,
and it invokes cpu_stop_queue_two_works(1, 2,...), such that
thread 2 queues the works for migration/1 and migration/2.
Meanwhile, on CPU 3, thread 1 resumes execution, and wakes
migration/2 and migration/3. This means that when CPU 2
releases the locks for migration/1 and migration/2, but before
it wakes those threads, it can be preempted by migration/2.
If thread 2 is preempted by migration/2, then migration/2 will
execute the first work item successfully, since migration/3
was woken up by CPU 3, but when it goes to execute the second
work item, it disables preemption, calls multi_cpu_stop(),
and thus, CPU 2 will wait forever for migration/1, which should
have been woken up by thread 2. However migration/1 cannot be
woken up by thread 2, since it is a kworker, so it is affine to
CPU 2, but CPU 2 is running migration/2 with preemption
disabled, so thread 2 will never run.
Disable preemption after queueing works for stopper threads
to ensure that the operation of queueing the works and waking
the stopper threads is atomic.
Co-Developed-by: Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@codeaurora.org>
Co-Developed-by: Pavankumar Kondeti <pkondeti@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Isaac J. Manjarres <isaacm@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Pavankumar Kondeti <pkondeti@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: bigeasy@linutronix.de
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: matt@codeblueprint.co.uk
Fixes: 9fb8d5dc4b64 ("stop_machine, Disable preemption when waking two stopper threads")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1531856129-9871-1-git-send-email-isaacm@codeaurora.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/stop_machine.c | 10 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/stop_machine.c b/kernel/stop_machine.c index 1ff523dae6e2..e190d1ef3a23 100644 --- a/kernel/stop_machine.c +++ b/kernel/stop_machine.c @@ -260,6 +260,15 @@ retry: err = 0; __cpu_stop_queue_work(stopper1, work1, &wakeq); __cpu_stop_queue_work(stopper2, work2, &wakeq); + /* + * The waking up of stopper threads has to happen + * in the same scheduling context as the queueing. + * Otherwise, there is a possibility of one of the + * above stoppers being woken up by another CPU, + * and preempting us. This will cause us to n ot + * wake up the other stopper forever. + */ + preempt_disable(); unlock: raw_spin_unlock(&stopper2->lock); raw_spin_unlock_irq(&stopper1->lock); @@ -271,7 +280,6 @@ unlock: } if (!err) { - preempt_disable(); wake_up_q(&wakeq); preempt_enable(); } |