diff options
author | Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> | 2018-05-03 14:56:12 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | 2018-05-22 16:58:01 +0200 |
commit | ab677c2addbb128f334c4906f27a0285a67d2180 (patch) | |
tree | 011f4d9ebba6bf311693ea6c641d99d1c6d14323 | |
parent | c71def81cd07e1bd74da468ae6abe1ce62e3157b (diff) | |
download | linux-stable-ab677c2addbb128f334c4906f27a0285a67d2180.tar.gz linux-stable-ab677c2addbb128f334c4906f27a0285a67d2180.tar.bz2 linux-stable-ab677c2addbb128f334c4906f27a0285a67d2180.zip |
seccomp: Add filter flag to opt-out of SSB mitigation
commit 00a02d0c502a06d15e07b857f8ff921e3e402675 upstream
If a seccomp user is not interested in Speculative Store Bypass mitigation
by default, it can set the new SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_SPEC_ALLOW flag when
adding filters.
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-rw-r--r-- | include/linux/seccomp.h | 3 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | include/uapi/linux/seccomp.h | 4 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/seccomp.c | 19 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 78 |
4 files changed, 93 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/seccomp.h b/include/linux/seccomp.h index ecc296c137cd..50c460a956f1 100644 --- a/include/linux/seccomp.h +++ b/include/linux/seccomp.h @@ -3,7 +3,8 @@ #include <uapi/linux/seccomp.h> -#define SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_MASK (SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC) +#define SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_MASK (SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC | \ + SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_SPEC_ALLOW) #ifdef CONFIG_SECCOMP diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/seccomp.h b/include/uapi/linux/seccomp.h index 0f238a43ff1e..e4acb615792b 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/seccomp.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/seccomp.h @@ -15,7 +15,9 @@ #define SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER 1 /* Valid flags for SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER */ -#define SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC 1 +#define SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC (1UL << 0) +/* In v4.14+ SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_LOG is (1UL << 1) */ +#define SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_SPEC_ALLOW (1UL << 2) /* * All BPF programs must return a 32-bit value. diff --git a/kernel/seccomp.c b/kernel/seccomp.c index a0bd6ea1ff90..62a60e7454a9 100644 --- a/kernel/seccomp.c +++ b/kernel/seccomp.c @@ -230,7 +230,8 @@ static inline void spec_mitigate(struct task_struct *task, } static inline void seccomp_assign_mode(struct task_struct *task, - unsigned long seccomp_mode) + unsigned long seccomp_mode, + unsigned long flags) { assert_spin_locked(&task->sighand->siglock); @@ -240,8 +241,9 @@ static inline void seccomp_assign_mode(struct task_struct *task, * filter) is set. */ smp_mb__before_atomic(); - /* Assume seccomp processes want speculation flaw mitigation. */ - spec_mitigate(task, PR_SPEC_STORE_BYPASS); + /* Assume default seccomp processes want spec flaw mitigation. */ + if ((flags & SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_SPEC_ALLOW) == 0) + spec_mitigate(task, PR_SPEC_STORE_BYPASS); set_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_SECCOMP); } @@ -309,7 +311,7 @@ static inline pid_t seccomp_can_sync_threads(void) * without dropping the locks. * */ -static inline void seccomp_sync_threads(void) +static inline void seccomp_sync_threads(unsigned long flags) { struct task_struct *thread, *caller; @@ -350,7 +352,8 @@ static inline void seccomp_sync_threads(void) * allow one thread to transition the other. */ if (thread->seccomp.mode == SECCOMP_MODE_DISABLED) - seccomp_assign_mode(thread, SECCOMP_MODE_FILTER); + seccomp_assign_mode(thread, SECCOMP_MODE_FILTER, + flags); } } @@ -469,7 +472,7 @@ static long seccomp_attach_filter(unsigned int flags, /* Now that the new filter is in place, synchronize to all threads. */ if (flags & SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC) - seccomp_sync_threads(); + seccomp_sync_threads(flags); return 0; } @@ -729,7 +732,7 @@ static long seccomp_set_mode_strict(void) #ifdef TIF_NOTSC disable_TSC(); #endif - seccomp_assign_mode(current, seccomp_mode); + seccomp_assign_mode(current, seccomp_mode, 0); ret = 0; out: @@ -787,7 +790,7 @@ static long seccomp_set_mode_filter(unsigned int flags, /* Do not free the successfully attached filter. */ prepared = NULL; - seccomp_assign_mode(current, seccomp_mode); + seccomp_assign_mode(current, seccomp_mode, flags); out: spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock); if (flags & SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c index f68998149351..d5be7b5ff899 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c @@ -1692,7 +1692,11 @@ TEST_F_SIGNAL(TRACE_syscall, kill_after_ptrace, SIGSYS) #endif #ifndef SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC -#define SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC 1 +#define SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC (1UL << 0) +#endif + +#ifndef SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_SPEC_ALLOW +#define SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_SPEC_ALLOW (1UL << 2) #endif #ifndef seccomp @@ -1791,6 +1795,78 @@ TEST(seccomp_syscall_mode_lock) } } +/* + * Test detection of known and unknown filter flags. Userspace needs to be able + * to check if a filter flag is supported by the current kernel and a good way + * of doing that is by attempting to enter filter mode, with the flag bit in + * question set, and a NULL pointer for the _args_ parameter. EFAULT indicates + * that the flag is valid and EINVAL indicates that the flag is invalid. + */ +TEST(detect_seccomp_filter_flags) +{ + unsigned int flags[] = { SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC, + SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_SPEC_ALLOW }; + unsigned int flag, all_flags; + int i; + long ret; + + /* Test detection of known-good filter flags */ + for (i = 0, all_flags = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(flags); i++) { + int bits = 0; + + flag = flags[i]; + /* Make sure the flag is a single bit! */ + while (flag) { + if (flag & 0x1) + bits ++; + flag >>= 1; + } + ASSERT_EQ(1, bits); + flag = flags[i]; + + ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, flag, NULL); + ASSERT_NE(ENOSYS, errno) { + TH_LOG("Kernel does not support seccomp syscall!"); + } + EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret); + EXPECT_EQ(EFAULT, errno) { + TH_LOG("Failed to detect that a known-good filter flag (0x%X) is supported!", + flag); + } + + all_flags |= flag; + } + + /* Test detection of all known-good filter flags */ + ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, all_flags, NULL); + EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret); + EXPECT_EQ(EFAULT, errno) { + TH_LOG("Failed to detect that all known-good filter flags (0x%X) are supported!", + all_flags); + } + + /* Test detection of an unknown filter flag */ + flag = -1; + ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, flag, NULL); + EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret); + EXPECT_EQ(EINVAL, errno) { + TH_LOG("Failed to detect that an unknown filter flag (0x%X) is unsupported!", + flag); + } + + /* + * Test detection of an unknown filter flag that may simply need to be + * added to this test + */ + flag = flags[ARRAY_SIZE(flags) - 1] << 1; + ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, flag, NULL); + EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret); + EXPECT_EQ(EINVAL, errno) { + TH_LOG("Failed to detect that an unknown filter flag (0x%X) is unsupported! Does a new flag need to be added to this test?", + flag); + } +} + TEST(TSYNC_first) { struct sock_filter filter[] = { |