summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>2014-02-14 07:21:00 -0500
committerSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>2014-02-23 20:55:07 -0600
commita26054d184763969a411e3939fe243516715ff59 (patch)
tree949134388a332f66f28a80d329263031e7136d43
parent6b1168e1617d9d4db73ef5276490627abf5adec4 (diff)
downloadlinux-stable-a26054d184763969a411e3939fe243516715ff59.tar.gz
linux-stable-a26054d184763969a411e3939fe243516715ff59.tar.bz2
linux-stable-a26054d184763969a411e3939fe243516715ff59.zip
cifs: sanity check length of data to send before sending
We had a bug discovered recently where an upper layer function (cifs_iovec_write) could pass down a smb_rqst with an invalid amount of data in it. The length of the SMB frame would be correct, but the rqst struct would cause smb_send_rqst to send nearly 4GB of data. This should never be the case. Add some sanity checking to the beginning of smb_send_rqst that ensures that the amount of data we're going to send agrees with the length in the RFC1002 header. If it doesn't, WARN() and return -EIO to the upper layers. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Acked-by: Sachin Prabhu <sprabhu@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru> Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-rw-r--r--fs/cifs/transport.c29
1 files changed, 29 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/fs/cifs/transport.c b/fs/cifs/transport.c
index b37570952846..18cd5650a5fc 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/transport.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/transport.c
@@ -270,6 +270,26 @@ cifs_rqst_page_to_kvec(struct smb_rqst *rqst, unsigned int idx,
iov->iov_len = rqst->rq_pagesz;
}
+static unsigned long
+rqst_len(struct smb_rqst *rqst)
+{
+ unsigned int i;
+ struct kvec *iov = rqst->rq_iov;
+ unsigned long buflen = 0;
+
+ /* total up iov array first */
+ for (i = 0; i < rqst->rq_nvec; i++)
+ buflen += iov[i].iov_len;
+
+ /* add in the page array if there is one */
+ if (rqst->rq_npages) {
+ buflen += rqst->rq_pagesz * (rqst->rq_npages - 1);
+ buflen += rqst->rq_tailsz;
+ }
+
+ return buflen;
+}
+
static int
smb_send_rqst(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, struct smb_rqst *rqst)
{
@@ -277,6 +297,7 @@ smb_send_rqst(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, struct smb_rqst *rqst)
struct kvec *iov = rqst->rq_iov;
int n_vec = rqst->rq_nvec;
unsigned int smb_buf_length = get_rfc1002_length(iov[0].iov_base);
+ unsigned long send_length;
unsigned int i;
size_t total_len = 0, sent;
struct socket *ssocket = server->ssocket;
@@ -285,6 +306,14 @@ smb_send_rqst(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, struct smb_rqst *rqst)
if (ssocket == NULL)
return -ENOTSOCK;
+ /* sanity check send length */
+ send_length = rqst_len(rqst);
+ if (send_length != smb_buf_length + 4) {
+ WARN(1, "Send length mismatch(send_length=%lu smb_buf_length=%u)\n",
+ send_length, smb_buf_length);
+ return -EIO;
+ }
+
cifs_dbg(FYI, "Sending smb: smb_len=%u\n", smb_buf_length);
dump_smb(iov[0].iov_base, iov[0].iov_len);