diff options
author | Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> | 2021-08-13 00:48:14 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | 2021-09-15 09:50:40 +0200 |
commit | 2aa3d5c9e19e2db01985856bb87c1b46e1f64d50 (patch) | |
tree | ee93aec060abaacd25297d9dabafe8ccb18dc95f | |
parent | c03bf1bc84ea0189863aa808d233e42556568c5c (diff) | |
download | linux-stable-2aa3d5c9e19e2db01985856bb87c1b46e1f64d50.tar.gz linux-stable-2aa3d5c9e19e2db01985856bb87c1b46e1f64d50.tar.bz2 linux-stable-2aa3d5c9e19e2db01985856bb87c1b46e1f64d50.zip |
selftests/bpf: Fix test_core_autosize on big-endian machines
[ Upstream commit d164dd9a5c08c16a883b3de97d13948c7be7fa4d ]
The "probed" part of test_core_autosize copies an integer using
bpf_core_read() into an integer of a potentially different size.
On big-endian machines a destination offset is required for this to
produce a sensible result.
Fixes: 888d83b961f6 ("selftests/bpf: Validate libbpf's auto-sizing of LD/ST/STX instructions")
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210812224814.187460-1-iii@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
-rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_core_autosize.c | 20 |
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_core_autosize.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_core_autosize.c index 44f5aa2e8956..9a7829c5e4a7 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_core_autosize.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_core_autosize.c @@ -125,6 +125,16 @@ int handle_downsize(void *ctx) return 0; } +#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__ +#define bpf_core_read_int bpf_core_read +#else +#define bpf_core_read_int(dst, sz, src) ({ \ + /* Prevent "subtraction from stack pointer prohibited" */ \ + volatile long __off = sizeof(*dst) - (sz); \ + bpf_core_read((char *)(dst) + __off, sz, src); \ +}) +#endif + SEC("raw_tp/sys_enter") int handle_probed(void *ctx) { @@ -132,23 +142,23 @@ int handle_probed(void *ctx) __u64 tmp; tmp = 0; - bpf_core_read(&tmp, bpf_core_field_size(in->ptr), &in->ptr); + bpf_core_read_int(&tmp, bpf_core_field_size(in->ptr), &in->ptr); ptr_probed = tmp; tmp = 0; - bpf_core_read(&tmp, bpf_core_field_size(in->val1), &in->val1); + bpf_core_read_int(&tmp, bpf_core_field_size(in->val1), &in->val1); val1_probed = tmp; tmp = 0; - bpf_core_read(&tmp, bpf_core_field_size(in->val2), &in->val2); + bpf_core_read_int(&tmp, bpf_core_field_size(in->val2), &in->val2); val2_probed = tmp; tmp = 0; - bpf_core_read(&tmp, bpf_core_field_size(in->val3), &in->val3); + bpf_core_read_int(&tmp, bpf_core_field_size(in->val3), &in->val3); val3_probed = tmp; tmp = 0; - bpf_core_read(&tmp, bpf_core_field_size(in->val4), &in->val4); + bpf_core_read_int(&tmp, bpf_core_field_size(in->val4), &in->val4); val4_probed = tmp; return 0; |