diff options
author | Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> | 2016-09-26 18:55:25 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> | 2016-10-14 20:41:59 -0400 |
commit | f1a9622037cd370460fd06bb7e28d0f01ceb8ef1 (patch) | |
tree | 647a7c6d70173cbb7c40237a3dcfbd81346014d8 | |
parent | 89f39af129382a40d7cd1f6914617282cfeee28e (diff) | |
download | linux-stable-f1a9622037cd370460fd06bb7e28d0f01ceb8ef1.tar.gz linux-stable-f1a9622037cd370460fd06bb7e28d0f01ceb8ef1.tar.bz2 linux-stable-f1a9622037cd370460fd06bb7e28d0f01ceb8ef1.zip |
fs/super.c: don't fool lockdep in freeze_super() and thaw_super() paths
sb_wait_write()->percpu_rwsem_release() fools lockdep to avoid the
false-positives. Now that xfs was fixed by Dave's commit dbad7c993053
("xfs: stop holding ILOCK over filldir callbacks") we can remove it and
change freeze_super() and thaw_super() to run with s_writers.rw_sem locks
held; we add two trivial helpers for that, lockdep_sb_freeze_release()
and lockdep_sb_freeze_acquire().
xfstests-dev/check `grep -il freeze tests/*/???` does not trigger any
warning from lockdep.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-rw-r--r-- | fs/super.c | 37 |
1 files changed, 25 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/fs/super.c b/fs/super.c index 47d11e0462d0..c183835566c1 100644 --- a/fs/super.c +++ b/fs/super.c @@ -1269,25 +1269,34 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__sb_start_write); static void sb_wait_write(struct super_block *sb, int level) { percpu_down_write(sb->s_writers.rw_sem + level-1); - /* - * We are going to return to userspace and forget about this lock, the - * ownership goes to the caller of thaw_super() which does unlock. - * - * FIXME: we should do this before return from freeze_super() after we - * called sync_filesystem(sb) and s_op->freeze_fs(sb), and thaw_super() - * should re-acquire these locks before s_op->unfreeze_fs(sb). However - * this leads to lockdep false-positives, so currently we do the early - * release right after acquire. - */ - percpu_rwsem_release(sb->s_writers.rw_sem + level-1, 0, _THIS_IP_); } -static void sb_freeze_unlock(struct super_block *sb) +/* + * We are going to return to userspace and forget about these locks, the + * ownership goes to the caller of thaw_super() which does unlock(). + */ +static void lockdep_sb_freeze_release(struct super_block *sb) +{ + int level; + + for (level = SB_FREEZE_LEVELS - 1; level >= 0; level--) + percpu_rwsem_release(sb->s_writers.rw_sem + level, 0, _THIS_IP_); +} + +/* + * Tell lockdep we are holding these locks before we call ->unfreeze_fs(sb). + */ +static void lockdep_sb_freeze_acquire(struct super_block *sb) { int level; for (level = 0; level < SB_FREEZE_LEVELS; ++level) percpu_rwsem_acquire(sb->s_writers.rw_sem + level, 0, _THIS_IP_); +} + +static void sb_freeze_unlock(struct super_block *sb) +{ + int level; for (level = SB_FREEZE_LEVELS - 1; level >= 0; level--) percpu_up_write(sb->s_writers.rw_sem + level); @@ -1383,6 +1392,7 @@ int freeze_super(struct super_block *sb) * when frozen is set to SB_FREEZE_COMPLETE, and for thaw_super(). */ sb->s_writers.frozen = SB_FREEZE_COMPLETE; + lockdep_sb_freeze_release(sb); up_write(&sb->s_umount); return 0; } @@ -1409,11 +1419,14 @@ int thaw_super(struct super_block *sb) goto out; } + lockdep_sb_freeze_acquire(sb); + if (sb->s_op->unfreeze_fs) { error = sb->s_op->unfreeze_fs(sb); if (error) { printk(KERN_ERR "VFS:Filesystem thaw failed\n"); + lockdep_sb_freeze_release(sb); up_write(&sb->s_umount); return error; } |