summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorBaokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>2022-05-28 19:00:15 +0800
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>2022-06-22 14:11:23 +0200
commita6b31616e5afe1d3972cb0682a373e50597faf5c (patch)
tree24c5b606142be1d7c89b7331fe326f2723fbc273
parentae460312875159285cef5bf3dc654593f404a1ef (diff)
downloadlinux-stable-a6b31616e5afe1d3972cb0682a373e50597faf5c.tar.gz
linux-stable-a6b31616e5afe1d3972cb0682a373e50597faf5c.tar.bz2
linux-stable-a6b31616e5afe1d3972cb0682a373e50597faf5c.zip
ext4: fix bug_on ext4_mb_use_inode_pa
commit a08f789d2ab5242c07e716baf9a835725046be89 upstream. Hulk Robot reported a BUG_ON: ================================================================== kernel BUG at fs/ext4/mballoc.c:3211! [...] RIP: 0010:ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used.cold+0x85/0x136f [...] Call Trace: ext4_mb_new_blocks+0x9df/0x5d30 ext4_ext_map_blocks+0x1803/0x4d80 ext4_map_blocks+0x3a4/0x1a10 ext4_writepages+0x126d/0x2c30 do_writepages+0x7f/0x1b0 __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x285/0x3b0 file_write_and_wait_range+0xb1/0x140 ext4_sync_file+0x1aa/0xca0 vfs_fsync_range+0xfb/0x260 do_fsync+0x48/0xa0 [...] ================================================================== Above issue may happen as follows: ------------------------------------- do_fsync vfs_fsync_range ext4_sync_file file_write_and_wait_range __filemap_fdatawrite_range do_writepages ext4_writepages mpage_map_and_submit_extent mpage_map_one_extent ext4_map_blocks ext4_mb_new_blocks ext4_mb_normalize_request >>> start + size <= ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical ext4_mb_regular_allocator ext4_mb_simple_scan_group ext4_mb_use_best_found ext4_mb_new_preallocation ext4_mb_new_inode_pa ext4_mb_use_inode_pa >>> set ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len <= 0 ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used >>> BUG_ON(ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len <= 0); we can easily reproduce this problem with the following commands: `fallocate -l100M disk` `mkfs.ext4 -b 1024 -g 256 disk` `mount disk /mnt` `fsstress -d /mnt -l 0 -n 1000 -p 1` The size must be smaller than or equal to EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP. Therefore, "start + size <= ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical" may occur when the size is truncated. So start should be the start position of the group where ac_o_ex.fe_logical is located after alignment. In addition, when the value of fe_logical or EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP is very large, the value calculated by start_off is more accurate. Cc: stable@kernel.org Fixes: cd648b8a8fd5 ("ext4: trim allocation requests to group size") Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220528110017.354175-2-libaokun1@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-rw-r--r--fs/ext4/mballoc.c9
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index 0307702d114d..3c3166ba4364 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -3172,6 +3172,15 @@ ext4_mb_normalize_request(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
size = size >> bsbits;
start = start_off >> bsbits;
+ /*
+ * For tiny groups (smaller than 8MB) the chosen allocation
+ * alignment may be larger than group size. Make sure the
+ * alignment does not move allocation to a different group which
+ * makes mballoc fail assertions later.
+ */
+ start = max(start, rounddown(ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical,
+ (ext4_lblk_t)EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(ac->ac_sb)));
+
/* don't cover already allocated blocks in selected range */
if (ar->pleft && start <= ar->lleft) {
size -= ar->lleft + 1 - start;