summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>2006-04-10 22:54:24 -0700
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@g5.osdl.org>2006-04-11 06:18:44 -0700
commitc14038c39ddd9c14225907a05a6ac4d91d645ef1 (patch)
treea9f57acaaf9764b35ab9e50f370b8e6859f9501e /Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
parentdbc8700e27a94621de9d22c506c67913e0121501 (diff)
downloadlinux-stable-c14038c39ddd9c14225907a05a6ac4d91d645ef1.tar.gz
linux-stable-c14038c39ddd9c14225907a05a6ac4d91d645ef1.tar.bz2
linux-stable-c14038c39ddd9c14225907a05a6ac4d91d645ef1.zip
[PATCH] Improve data-dependency memory barrier example in documentation
In the memory barrier document, improve the example of the data dependency barrier situation by: (1) showing the initial values of the variables involved; and (2) repeating the instruction sequence description, this time with the data dependency barrier actually shown to make it clear what the revised sequence actually is. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/memory-barriers.txt')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/memory-barriers.txt16
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
index 528d52f52eeb..92f0056d928c 100644
--- a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
+++ b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
@@ -610,6 +610,7 @@ loads. Consider the following sequence of events:
CPU 1 CPU 2
======================= =======================
+ { B = 7; X = 9; Y = 8; C = &Y }
STORE A = 1
STORE B = 2
<write barrier>
@@ -651,7 +652,20 @@ In the above example, CPU 2 perceives that B is 7, despite the load of *C
(which would be B) coming after the the LOAD of C.
If, however, a data dependency barrier were to be placed between the load of C
-and the load of *C (ie: B) on CPU 2, then the following will occur:
+and the load of *C (ie: B) on CPU 2:
+
+ CPU 1 CPU 2
+ ======================= =======================
+ { B = 7; X = 9; Y = 8; C = &Y }
+ STORE A = 1
+ STORE B = 2
+ <write barrier>
+ STORE C = &B LOAD X
+ STORE D = 4 LOAD C (gets &B)
+ <data dependency barrier>
+ LOAD *C (reads B)
+
+then the following will occur:
+-------+ : : : :
| | +------+ +-------+