diff options
author | Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com> | 2012-02-13 22:30:39 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com> | 2012-03-06 19:14:12 +0200 |
commit | 7a186941626d19f668b08108db158379b32e6e02 (patch) | |
tree | d478210fa3ae45ef8b3eaf6a6432eadc49cbb55a /Documentation/remoteproc.txt | |
parent | 41a6ee09ee8dd7ac3a6ac12a24e26279b5d93385 (diff) | |
download | linux-stable-7a186941626d19f668b08108db158379b32e6e02.tar.gz linux-stable-7a186941626d19f668b08108db158379b32e6e02.tar.bz2 linux-stable-7a186941626d19f668b08108db158379b32e6e02.zip |
remoteproc: remove the single rpmsg vdev limitation
Now that the resource table supports publishing a virtio device
in a single resource entry, firmware images can start supporting
more than a single vdev.
This patch removes the single vdev limitation of the remoteproc
framework so multi-vdev firmwares can be leveraged: VDEV resource
entries are parsed when the rproc is registered, and as a result
their vrings are set up and the virtio devices are registered
(and they go away when the rproc goes away).
Moreover, we no longer only support VIRTIO_ID_RPMSG vdevs; any
virtio device type goes now. As a result, there's no more any
rpmsg-specific APIs or code in remoteproc: it all becomes generic
virtio handling.
Signed-off-by: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
Cc: Brian Swetland <swetland@google.com>
Cc: Iliyan Malchev <malchev@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Mark Grosen <mgrosen@ti.com>
Cc: John Williams <john.williams@petalogix.com>
Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
Cc: Loic PALLARDY <loic.pallardy@stericsson.com>
Cc: Ludovic BARRE <ludovic.barre@stericsson.com>
Cc: Omar Ramirez Luna <omar.luna@linaro.org>
Cc: Guzman Lugo Fernando <fernando.lugo@ti.com>
Cc: Anna Suman <s-anna@ti.com>
Cc: Clark Rob <rob@ti.com>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
Cc: David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Kieran Bingham <kieranbingham@gmail.com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/remoteproc.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/remoteproc.txt | 9 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/remoteproc.txt b/Documentation/remoteproc.txt index 07057cacfeae..70a048cd3fa3 100644 --- a/Documentation/remoteproc.txt +++ b/Documentation/remoteproc.txt @@ -20,6 +20,11 @@ platform-specific remoteproc drivers only need to provide a few low-level handlers, and then all rpmsg drivers will then just work (for more information about the virtio-based rpmsg bus and its drivers, please read Documentation/rpmsg.txt). +Registration of other types of virtio devices is now also possible. Firmwares +just need to publish what kind of virtio devices do they support, and then +remoteproc will add those devices. This makes it possible to reuse the +existing virtio drivers with remote processor backends at a minimal development +cost. 2. User API @@ -136,8 +141,6 @@ int dummy_rproc_example(struct rproc *my_rproc) If found, those virtio devices will be created and added, so as a result of registering this remote processor, additional virtio drivers might get probed. - Currently, though, we only support a single RPMSG virtio vdev per remote - processor. int rproc_unregister(struct rproc *rproc) - Unregister a remote processor, and decrement its refcount. @@ -174,7 +177,7 @@ struct rproc_ops { }; Every remoteproc implementation should at least provide the ->start and ->stop -handlers. If rpmsg functionality is also desired, then the ->kick handler +handlers. If rpmsg/virtio functionality is also desired, then the ->kick handler should be provided as well. The ->start() handler takes an rproc handle and should then power on the |