summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/Documentation
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2023-11-23 10:40:13 -0800
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2023-11-23 10:40:13 -0800
commitd3fa86b1a7b4cdc4367acacea16b72e0a200b3d7 (patch)
treefd40e9d155e34998831dc46c70dbda3d09bd6da6 /Documentation
parent9b6de136b5f0158c60844f85286a593cb70fb364 (diff)
parent39f04b1406b23fcc129a67e70d6205d5a7322f38 (diff)
downloadlinux-stable-d3fa86b1a7b4cdc4367acacea16b72e0a200b3d7.tar.gz
linux-stable-d3fa86b1a7b4cdc4367acacea16b72e0a200b3d7.tar.bz2
linux-stable-d3fa86b1a7b4cdc4367acacea16b72e0a200b3d7.zip
Merge tag 'net-6.7-rc3' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net
Pull networking fixes from Jakub Kicinski: "Including fixes from bpf. Current release - regressions: - Revert "net: r8169: Disable multicast filter for RTL8168H and RTL8107E" - kselftest: rtnetlink: fix ip route command typo Current release - new code bugs: - s390/ism: make sure ism driver implies smc protocol in kconfig - two build fixes for tools/net Previous releases - regressions: - rxrpc: couple of ACK/PING/RTT handling fixes Previous releases - always broken: - bpf: verify bpf_loop() callbacks as if they are called unknown number of times - improve stability of auto-bonding with Hyper-V - account BPF-neigh-redirected traffic in interface statistics Misc: - net: fill in some more MODULE_DESCRIPTION()s" * tag 'net-6.7-rc3' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net: (58 commits) tools: ynl: fix duplicate op name in devlink tools: ynl: fix header path for nfsd net: ipa: fix one GSI register field width tls: fix NULL deref on tls_sw_splice_eof() with empty record net: axienet: Fix check for partial TX checksum vsock/test: fix SEQPACKET message bounds test i40e: Fix adding unsupported cloud filters ice: restore timestamp configuration after device reset ice: unify logic for programming PFINT_TSYN_MSK ice: remove ptp_tx ring parameter flag amd-xgbe: propagate the correct speed and duplex status amd-xgbe: handle the corner-case during tx completion amd-xgbe: handle corner-case during sfp hotplug net: veth: fix ethtool stats reporting octeontx2-pf: Fix ntuple rule creation to direct packet to VF with higher Rx queue than its PF net: usb: qmi_wwan: claim interface 4 for ZTE MF290 Revert "net: r8169: Disable multicast filter for RTL8168H and RTL8107E" net/smc: avoid data corruption caused by decline nfc: virtual_ncidev: Add variable to check if ndev is running dpll: Fix potential msg memleak when genlmsg_put_reply failed ...
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst20
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst b/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst
index 7feacc20835e..84ee60fceef2 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst
@@ -193,9 +193,23 @@ Review timelines
Generally speaking, the patches get triaged quickly (in less than
48h). But be patient, if your patch is active in patchwork (i.e. it's
listed on the project's patch list) the chances it was missed are close to zero.
-Asking the maintainer for status updates on your
-patch is a good way to ensure your patch is ignored or pushed to the
-bottom of the priority list.
+
+The high volume of development on netdev makes reviewers move on
+from discussions relatively quickly. New comments and replies
+are very unlikely to arrive after a week of silence. If a patch
+is no longer active in patchwork and the thread went idle for more
+than a week - clarify the next steps and/or post the next version.
+
+For RFC postings specifically, if nobody responded in a week - reviewers
+either missed the posting or have no strong opinions. If the code is ready,
+repost as a PATCH.
+
+Emails saying just "ping" or "bump" are considered rude. If you can't figure
+out the status of the patch from patchwork or where the discussion has
+landed - describe your best guess and ask if it's correct. For example::
+
+ I don't understand what the next steps are. Person X seems to be unhappy
+ with A, should I do B and repost the patches?
.. _Changes requested: