diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2023-11-23 10:40:13 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2023-11-23 10:40:13 -0800 |
commit | d3fa86b1a7b4cdc4367acacea16b72e0a200b3d7 (patch) | |
tree | fd40e9d155e34998831dc46c70dbda3d09bd6da6 /Documentation | |
parent | 9b6de136b5f0158c60844f85286a593cb70fb364 (diff) | |
parent | 39f04b1406b23fcc129a67e70d6205d5a7322f38 (diff) | |
download | linux-stable-d3fa86b1a7b4cdc4367acacea16b72e0a200b3d7.tar.gz linux-stable-d3fa86b1a7b4cdc4367acacea16b72e0a200b3d7.tar.bz2 linux-stable-d3fa86b1a7b4cdc4367acacea16b72e0a200b3d7.zip |
Merge tag 'net-6.7-rc3' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net
Pull networking fixes from Jakub Kicinski:
"Including fixes from bpf.
Current release - regressions:
- Revert "net: r8169: Disable multicast filter for RTL8168H and
RTL8107E"
- kselftest: rtnetlink: fix ip route command typo
Current release - new code bugs:
- s390/ism: make sure ism driver implies smc protocol in kconfig
- two build fixes for tools/net
Previous releases - regressions:
- rxrpc: couple of ACK/PING/RTT handling fixes
Previous releases - always broken:
- bpf: verify bpf_loop() callbacks as if they are called unknown
number of times
- improve stability of auto-bonding with Hyper-V
- account BPF-neigh-redirected traffic in interface statistics
Misc:
- net: fill in some more MODULE_DESCRIPTION()s"
* tag 'net-6.7-rc3' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net: (58 commits)
tools: ynl: fix duplicate op name in devlink
tools: ynl: fix header path for nfsd
net: ipa: fix one GSI register field width
tls: fix NULL deref on tls_sw_splice_eof() with empty record
net: axienet: Fix check for partial TX checksum
vsock/test: fix SEQPACKET message bounds test
i40e: Fix adding unsupported cloud filters
ice: restore timestamp configuration after device reset
ice: unify logic for programming PFINT_TSYN_MSK
ice: remove ptp_tx ring parameter flag
amd-xgbe: propagate the correct speed and duplex status
amd-xgbe: handle the corner-case during tx completion
amd-xgbe: handle corner-case during sfp hotplug
net: veth: fix ethtool stats reporting
octeontx2-pf: Fix ntuple rule creation to direct packet to VF with higher Rx queue than its PF
net: usb: qmi_wwan: claim interface 4 for ZTE MF290
Revert "net: r8169: Disable multicast filter for RTL8168H and RTL8107E"
net/smc: avoid data corruption caused by decline
nfc: virtual_ncidev: Add variable to check if ndev is running
dpll: Fix potential msg memleak when genlmsg_put_reply failed
...
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation')
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst | 20 |
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst b/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst index 7feacc20835e..84ee60fceef2 100644 --- a/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst +++ b/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst @@ -193,9 +193,23 @@ Review timelines Generally speaking, the patches get triaged quickly (in less than 48h). But be patient, if your patch is active in patchwork (i.e. it's listed on the project's patch list) the chances it was missed are close to zero. -Asking the maintainer for status updates on your -patch is a good way to ensure your patch is ignored or pushed to the -bottom of the priority list. + +The high volume of development on netdev makes reviewers move on +from discussions relatively quickly. New comments and replies +are very unlikely to arrive after a week of silence. If a patch +is no longer active in patchwork and the thread went idle for more +than a week - clarify the next steps and/or post the next version. + +For RFC postings specifically, if nobody responded in a week - reviewers +either missed the posting or have no strong opinions. If the code is ready, +repost as a PATCH. + +Emails saying just "ping" or "bump" are considered rude. If you can't figure +out the status of the patch from patchwork or where the discussion has +landed - describe your best guess and ask if it's correct. For example:: + + I don't understand what the next steps are. Person X seems to be unhappy + with A, should I do B and repost the patches? .. _Changes requested: |