diff options
author | Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> | 2014-02-03 11:31:19 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> | 2014-02-18 21:23:19 +0100 |
commit | fb3174e4ad2427c6ad90c67093d6ca97f13e8672 (patch) | |
tree | cfa185f249c166f8302513a6b57432bfa11b53c8 /arch/arm | |
parent | 79f08d9ed217318b4f325b7fcf8f26dcd0e41689 (diff) | |
download | linux-stable-fb3174e4ad2427c6ad90c67093d6ca97f13e8672.tar.gz linux-stable-fb3174e4ad2427c6ad90c67093d6ca97f13e8672.tar.bz2 linux-stable-fb3174e4ad2427c6ad90c67093d6ca97f13e8672.zip |
ARM: ixp4xx: fix timer latch calculation
In commit f0402f9b4711 ("ARM: ixp4xx: stop using <mach/timex.h>")
I didn't intend to implement a functional change, but as Olof noticed I
failed---at least a bit. Before this commit the following was used to
determine the latch value used:
#define IXP4XX_TIMER_FREQ 66666000
#define CLOCK_TICK_RATE \
(((IXP4XX_TIMER_FREQ / HZ & ~IXP4XX_OST_RELOAD_MASK) + 1) * HZ)
#define LATCH ((CLOCK_TICK_RATE + HZ/2) / HZ)
The complicated calculation was done "b/c the timer register ignores the
bottom 2 bits of the LATCH value." With HZ=100 CLOCK_TICK_RATE used to
calculate to 66666100 and so LATCH to 666661. In ixp4xx_set_mode the
term
LATCH & ~IXP4XX_OST_RELOAD_MASK
was used to write to the relevant register (with IXP4XX_OST_RELOAD_MASK
being 3) and so effectively 666660 was used.
In commit f0402f9b4711 I translated that to:
#define IXP4XX_TIMER_FREQ 66666000
#define IXP4XX_LATCH DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(IXP4XX_TIMER_FREQ, HZ)
which results in the same register writes, but still doesn't bear in
mind that the two least significant bits cannot be specified (which is
relevant only when HZ or IXP4XX_TIMER_FREQ are changed).
Instead of reverting back to the old approach use a more obvious and
also more correct way to calculate LATCH. (Regarding the more
correct claim: With IXP4XX_TIMER_FREQ == 66665999, the old code resulted
in LATCH = 666657 corresponding to a cycle time of 0.009999940149400597
seconds (error: -6.0e-8 s) while the new approach results in LATCH =
666660 and so a cycle time of 0.010000000150001503 seconds
(error: 1.5e-10 s).)
Fixes: f0402f9b4711 ("ARM: ixp4xx: stop using <mach/timex.h>")
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/arm')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/common.c | 10 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/common.c b/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/common.c index 20b62aa30086..37e6cdac1642 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/common.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/common.c @@ -45,7 +45,15 @@ #include <asm/mach/time.h> #define IXP4XX_TIMER_FREQ 66666000 -#define IXP4XX_LATCH DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(IXP4XX_TIMER_FREQ, HZ) + +/* + * The timer register doesn't allow to specify the two least significant bits of + * the timeout value and assumes them being zero. So make sure IXP4XX_LATCH is + * the best value with the two least significant bits unset. + */ +#define IXP4XX_LATCH DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(IXP4XX_TIMER_FREQ, \ + (IXP4XX_OST_RELOAD_MASK + 1) * HZ) * \ + (IXP4XX_OST_RELOAD_MASK + 1) static void __init ixp4xx_clocksource_init(void); static void __init ixp4xx_clockevent_init(void); |