diff options
author | Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> | 2015-09-24 14:54:48 +0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> | 2015-09-26 01:46:24 +0200 |
commit | 0700c047f66101c7d0d23e3583f1ae9c3c2dd71c (patch) | |
tree | 0527eadfd6dd06cae0c65fbb53cb5001648db3f0 /drivers/acpi/ec.c | |
parent | 15b94fa32a422f4b97dc34e4b7060ec83d10bee5 (diff) | |
download | linux-stable-0700c047f66101c7d0d23e3583f1ae9c3c2dd71c.tar.gz linux-stable-0700c047f66101c7d0d23e3583f1ae9c3c2dd71c.tar.bz2 linux-stable-0700c047f66101c7d0d23e3583f1ae9c3c2dd71c.zip |
ACPI / EC: Fix query handler related issues
1. acpi_ec_remove_query_handlers()
This patch refines the query handler removal logic implemented in
acpi_ec_remove_query_handler(), making it to invoke new
acpi_ec_remove_query_handlers() API, and ensuring all other removal code
paths to invoke the new API to honor the reference count of the query
handlers.
2. acpi_ec_get_query_handler_by_value()
This patch also refines the query handler search logic originally
implemented in acpi_ec_query(), collecting it into
acpi_ec_get_query_handler_by_value(). And since schedule_work() can ensure
the serilization of acpi_ec_event_handler(), we needn't put the
mutex_lock() around schedule_work().
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/acpi/ec.c')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/acpi/ec.c | 73 |
1 files changed, 45 insertions, 28 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/ec.c b/drivers/acpi/ec.c index 42c66b64c12c..2db0912bb2e6 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/ec.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/ec.c @@ -929,6 +929,23 @@ acpi_ec_get_query_handler(struct acpi_ec_query_handler *handler) return handler; } +static struct acpi_ec_query_handler * +acpi_ec_get_query_handler_by_value(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8 value) +{ + struct acpi_ec_query_handler *handler; + bool found = false; + + mutex_lock(&ec->mutex); + list_for_each_entry(handler, &ec->list, node) { + if (value == handler->query_bit) { + found = true; + break; + } + } + mutex_unlock(&ec->mutex); + return found ? acpi_ec_get_query_handler(handler) : NULL; +} + static void acpi_ec_query_handler_release(struct kref *kref) { struct acpi_ec_query_handler *handler = @@ -964,14 +981,15 @@ int acpi_ec_add_query_handler(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8 query_bit, } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_ec_add_query_handler); -void acpi_ec_remove_query_handler(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8 query_bit) +static void acpi_ec_remove_query_handlers(struct acpi_ec *ec, + bool remove_all, u8 query_bit) { struct acpi_ec_query_handler *handler, *tmp; LIST_HEAD(free_list); mutex_lock(&ec->mutex); list_for_each_entry_safe(handler, tmp, &ec->list, node) { - if (query_bit == handler->query_bit) { + if (remove_all || query_bit == handler->query_bit) { list_del_init(&handler->node); list_add(&handler->node, &free_list); } @@ -980,6 +998,11 @@ void acpi_ec_remove_query_handler(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8 query_bit) list_for_each_entry_safe(handler, tmp, &free_list, node) acpi_ec_put_query_handler(handler); } + +void acpi_ec_remove_query_handler(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8 query_bit) +{ + acpi_ec_remove_query_handlers(ec, false, query_bit); +} EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_ec_remove_query_handler); static struct acpi_ec_query *acpi_ec_create_query(u8 *pval) @@ -1025,7 +1048,6 @@ static int acpi_ec_query(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8 *data) { u8 value = 0; int result; - struct acpi_ec_query_handler *handler; struct acpi_ec_query *q; q = acpi_ec_create_query(&value); @@ -1043,25 +1065,26 @@ static int acpi_ec_query(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8 *data) if (result) goto err_exit; - mutex_lock(&ec->mutex); - result = -ENODATA; - list_for_each_entry(handler, &ec->list, node) { - if (value == handler->query_bit) { - result = 0; - q->handler = acpi_ec_get_query_handler(handler); - ec_dbg_evt("Query(0x%02x) scheduled", - q->handler->query_bit); - /* - * It is reported that _Qxx are evaluated in a - * parallel way on Windows: - * https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94411 - */ - if (!schedule_work(&q->work)) - result = -EBUSY; - break; - } + q->handler = acpi_ec_get_query_handler_by_value(ec, value); + if (!q->handler) { + result = -ENODATA; + goto err_exit; + } + + /* + * It is reported that _Qxx are evaluated in a parallel way on + * Windows: + * https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94411 + * + * Put this log entry before schedule_work() in order to make + * it appearing before any other log entries occurred during the + * work queue execution. + */ + ec_dbg_evt("Query(0x%02x) scheduled", value); + if (!schedule_work(&q->work)) { + ec_dbg_evt("Query(0x%02x) overlapped", value); + result = -EBUSY; } - mutex_unlock(&ec->mutex); err_exit: if (result && q) @@ -1354,19 +1377,13 @@ static int acpi_ec_add(struct acpi_device *device) static int acpi_ec_remove(struct acpi_device *device) { struct acpi_ec *ec; - struct acpi_ec_query_handler *handler, *tmp; if (!device) return -EINVAL; ec = acpi_driver_data(device); ec_remove_handlers(ec); - mutex_lock(&ec->mutex); - list_for_each_entry_safe(handler, tmp, &ec->list, node) { - list_del(&handler->node); - kfree(handler); - } - mutex_unlock(&ec->mutex); + acpi_ec_remove_query_handlers(ec, true, 0); release_region(ec->data_addr, 1); release_region(ec->command_addr, 1); device->driver_data = NULL; |