diff options
| author | Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> | 2017-01-30 09:59:57 +0530 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> | 2017-02-04 00:05:29 +0100 |
| commit | fa29ae5f221860e22a7346d89ae38a28ed104045 (patch) | |
| tree | 0ddc8a0902ea5503648fe271092aa1dda385ab9f /drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c | |
| parent | b12f7a2b01f7adebb9982a6547f4e930914829a9 (diff) | |
| download | linux-stable-fa29ae5f221860e22a7346d89ae38a28ed104045.tar.gz linux-stable-fa29ae5f221860e22a7346d89ae38a28ed104045.tar.bz2 linux-stable-fa29ae5f221860e22a7346d89ae38a28ed104045.zip | |
ACPI: processor_perflib: Simplify code and stop using CPUFREQ_START
acpi_processor_ppc_notifier() can live without using CPUFREQ_START
(which is gonna be removed soon), as it is only used while setting
ignore_ppc to 0. This can be done with the help of "ignore_ppc < 0"
check alone. The notifier function anyway ignores all events except
CPUFREQ_ADJUST and dropping CPUFREQ_START wouldn't harm at all.
Once CPUFREQ_START event is removed from the cpufreq core,
acpi_processor_ppc_notifier() will get called only for CPUFREQ_NOTIFY or
CPUFREQ_ADJUST event. Drop the return statement from the first if block
to make sure we don't ignore any such events.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c | 4 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c index f0b4a981b8d3..18b72eec3507 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c @@ -75,10 +75,8 @@ static int acpi_processor_ppc_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, struct acpi_processor *pr; unsigned int ppc = 0; - if (event == CPUFREQ_START && ignore_ppc <= 0) { + if (ignore_ppc < 0) ignore_ppc = 0; - return 0; - } if (ignore_ppc) return 0; |