diff options
| author | Kamlakant Patel <kamlakantp@marvell.com> | 2019-04-24 11:50:43 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | 2019-06-11 12:23:39 +0200 |
| commit | 064d0c5a9ae6dfc6d7d3e9b943404743e856080b (patch) | |
| tree | 0ff4c72dcf0fb1efdc33df9a7c37b3bcf8d43c17 /drivers/char | |
| parent | bef039b2419ea35f5acede56820b42e818cdcdcb (diff) | |
| download | linux-stable-064d0c5a9ae6dfc6d7d3e9b943404743e856080b.tar.gz linux-stable-064d0c5a9ae6dfc6d7d3e9b943404743e856080b.tar.bz2 linux-stable-064d0c5a9ae6dfc6d7d3e9b943404743e856080b.zip | |
ipmi:ssif: compare block number correctly for multi-part return messages
commit 55be8658c7e2feb11a5b5b33ee031791dbd23a69 upstream.
According to ipmi spec, block number is a number that is incremented,
starting with 0, for each new block of message data returned using the
middle transaction.
Here, the 'blocknum' is data[0] which always starts from zero(0) and
'ssif_info->multi_pos' starts from 1.
So, we need to add +1 to blocknum while comparing with multi_pos.
Fixes: 7d6380cd40f79 ("ipmi:ssif: Fix handling of multi-part return messages").
Reported-by: Kiran Kolukuluru <kirank@ami.com>
Signed-off-by: Kamlakant Patel <kamlakantp@marvell.com>
Message-Id: <1556106615-18722-1-git-send-email-kamlakantp@marvell.com>
[Also added a debug log if the block numbers don't match.]
Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/char')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c | 6 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c index b2da2382d544..67d23ed2d1a0 100644 --- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c @@ -695,12 +695,16 @@ static void msg_done_handler(struct ssif_info *ssif_info, int result, /* End of read */ len = ssif_info->multi_len; data = ssif_info->data; - } else if (blocknum != ssif_info->multi_pos) { + } else if (blocknum + 1 != ssif_info->multi_pos) { /* * Out of sequence block, just abort. Block * numbers start at zero for the second block, * but multi_pos starts at one, so the +1. */ + if (ssif_info->ssif_debug & SSIF_DEBUG_MSG) + dev_dbg(&ssif_info->client->dev, + "Received message out of sequence, expected %u, got %u\n", + ssif_info->multi_pos - 1, blocknum); result = -EIO; } else { ssif_inc_stat(ssif_info, received_message_parts); |