diff options
| author | Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> | 2020-09-22 11:15:50 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> | 2020-09-22 19:32:03 +0200 |
| commit | bd805274577457f301bf826f86543f550cf5c1ef (patch) | |
| tree | 9c381180083b902042cb2e059d979490d3373f34 /drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c | |
| parent | 36050d8984ab743f9990a2eb97a0062fdc3d7bbd (diff) | |
| download | linux-stable-bd805274577457f301bf826f86543f550cf5c1ef.tar.gz linux-stable-bd805274577457f301bf826f86543f550cf5c1ef.tar.bz2 linux-stable-bd805274577457f301bf826f86543f550cf5c1ef.zip | |
cpuidle: Drop misleading comments about RCU usage
The commit 1098582a0f6c ("sched,idle,rcu: Push rcu_idle deeper into the
idle path"), moved the calls rcu_idle_enter|exit() into the cpuidle core.
However, it forgot to remove a couple of comments in enter_s2idle_proper()
about why RCU_NONIDLE earlier was needed. So, let's drop them as they have
become a bit misleading.
Fixes: 1098582a0f6c ("sched,idle,rcu: Push rcu_idle deeper into the idle path")
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c | 10 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c index 6c7e5621cf9a..29e84687f3c3 100644 --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c @@ -142,11 +142,6 @@ static void enter_s2idle_proper(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, time_start = ns_to_ktime(local_clock()); - /* - * trace_suspend_resume() called by tick_freeze() for the last CPU - * executing it contains RCU usage regarded as invalid in the idle - * context, so tell RCU about that. - */ tick_freeze(); /* * The state used here cannot be a "coupled" one, because the "coupled" @@ -159,11 +154,6 @@ static void enter_s2idle_proper(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, target_state->enter_s2idle(dev, drv, index); if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!irqs_disabled())) local_irq_disable(); - /* - * timekeeping_resume() that will be called by tick_unfreeze() for the - * first CPU executing it calls functions containing RCU read-side - * critical sections, so tell RCU about that. - */ if (!(target_state->flags & CPUIDLE_FLAG_RCU_IDLE)) rcu_idle_exit(); tick_unfreeze(); |