diff options
| author | Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> | 2018-10-23 21:21:02 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> | 2018-10-24 15:14:45 +0300 |
| commit | 5d6f36b27d2764f3dc940606ee6b7ec5c669af3e (patch) | |
| tree | 3c2c3d7d6af6854b001c7a2bb661c2151d729a38 /drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | |
| parent | 26ee5bc390115ceaf82315fc88d0d6793c094361 (diff) | |
| download | linux-stable-5d6f36b27d2764f3dc940606ee6b7ec5c669af3e.tar.gz linux-stable-5d6f36b27d2764f3dc940606ee6b7ec5c669af3e.tar.bz2 linux-stable-5d6f36b27d2764f3dc940606ee6b7ec5c669af3e.zip | |
drm/i915: Don't apply the 16Gb DIMM wm latency w/a to BXT/GLK
The 16Gb DIMM w/a is not applicable to BXT or GLK. Limit it to
the appropriate platforms.
This was especially harsh on GLK since we don't even try to read
the DIMM information on that platforms, hence valid_dimm was
always false and thus we always tried to apply the w/a.
Furthermore the w/a pushed the level 0 latency above the
level 1 latency, which doesn't really make sense.
v2: Do the check when populating is_16gb_dimm (Mahesh)
Cc: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar@intel.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Fixes: 86b592876cb6 ("drm/i915: Implement 16GB dimm wa for latency level-0")
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181023182102.31549-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.sh.kumar@gmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 15 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c index baac35f698f9..6571044c9286 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c @@ -1165,8 +1165,6 @@ skl_dram_get_channels_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) return -EINVAL; } - dram_info->valid_dimm = true; - /* * If any of the channel is single rank channel, worst case output * will be same as if single rank memory, so consider single rank @@ -1183,8 +1181,7 @@ skl_dram_get_channels_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) return -EINVAL; } - if (ch0.is_16gb_dimm || ch1.is_16gb_dimm) - dram_info->is_16gb_dimm = true; + dram_info->is_16gb_dimm = ch0.is_16gb_dimm || ch1.is_16gb_dimm; dev_priv->dram_info.symmetric_memory = intel_is_dram_symmetric(val_ch0, val_ch1, @@ -1304,7 +1301,6 @@ bxt_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) return -EINVAL; } - dram_info->valid_dimm = true; dram_info->valid = true; return 0; } @@ -1317,12 +1313,17 @@ intel_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) int ret; dram_info->valid = false; - dram_info->valid_dimm = false; - dram_info->is_16gb_dimm = false; dram_info->rank = I915_DRAM_RANK_INVALID; dram_info->bandwidth_kbps = 0; dram_info->num_channels = 0; + /* + * Assume 16Gb DIMMs are present until proven otherwise. + * This is only used for the level 0 watermark latency + * w/a which does not apply to bxt/glk. + */ + dram_info->is_16gb_dimm = !IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv); + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 9 || IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv)) return; |