diff options
| author | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de> | 2009-04-30 14:43:31 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de> | 2009-06-15 21:30:26 -0700 |
| commit | bab030595a4f84c679fe26e05263e3dc9f560391 (patch) | |
| tree | 0a49f3a38b7798eaf79a10b76df718023f5da066 /drivers/ieee1394/eth1394.c | |
| parent | fcb5207723919ad85178420633d55efea80b652d (diff) | |
| download | linux-stable-bab030595a4f84c679fe26e05263e3dc9f560391.tar.gz linux-stable-bab030595a4f84c679fe26e05263e3dc9f560391.tar.bz2 linux-stable-bab030595a4f84c679fe26e05263e3dc9f560391.zip | |
ieee1394: remove driver_data direct access of struct device
In the near future, the driver core is going to not allow direct access
to the driver_data pointer in struct device. Instead, the functions
dev_get_drvdata() and dev_set_drvdata() should be used. These functions
have been around since the beginning, so are backwards compatible with
all older kernel versions.
Cc: linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Acked-by: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Cc: Ben Collins <ben.collins@ubuntu.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/ieee1394/eth1394.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/ieee1394/eth1394.c | 16 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/ieee1394/eth1394.c b/drivers/ieee1394/eth1394.c index 4ca103577c0a..f5c586c2bba6 100644 --- a/drivers/ieee1394/eth1394.c +++ b/drivers/ieee1394/eth1394.c @@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ static int eth1394_new_node(struct eth1394_host_info *hi, node_info->pdg.sz = 0; node_info->fifo = CSR1212_INVALID_ADDR_SPACE; - ud->device.driver_data = node_info; + dev_set_drvdata(&ud->device, node_info); new_node->ud = ud; priv = netdev_priv(hi->dev); @@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ static int eth1394_remove(struct device *dev) list_del(&old_node->list); kfree(old_node); - node_info = (struct eth1394_node_info*)ud->device.driver_data; + node_info = dev_get_drvdata(&ud->device); spin_lock_irqsave(&node_info->pdg.lock, flags); /* The partial datagram list should be empty, but we'll just @@ -416,7 +416,7 @@ static int eth1394_remove(struct device *dev) spin_unlock_irqrestore(&node_info->pdg.lock, flags); kfree(node_info); - ud->device.driver_data = NULL; + dev_set_drvdata(&ud->device, NULL); return 0; } @@ -688,7 +688,7 @@ static void ether1394_host_reset(struct hpsb_host *host) ether1394_reset_priv(dev, 0); list_for_each_entry(node, &priv->ip_node_list, list) { - node_info = node->ud->device.driver_data; + node_info = dev_get_drvdata(&node->ud->device); spin_lock_irqsave(&node_info->pdg.lock, flags); @@ -872,8 +872,7 @@ static __be16 ether1394_parse_encap(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev, if (!node) return cpu_to_be16(0); - node_info = - (struct eth1394_node_info *)node->ud->device.driver_data; + node_info = dev_get_drvdata(&node->ud->device); /* Update our speed/payload/fifo_offset table */ node_info->maxpayload = maxpayload; @@ -1080,7 +1079,7 @@ static int ether1394_data_handler(struct net_device *dev, int srcid, int destid, priv->ud_list[NODEID_TO_NODE(srcid)] = ud; } - node_info = (struct eth1394_node_info *)ud->device.driver_data; + node_info = dev_get_drvdata(&ud->device); /* First, did we receive a fragmented or unfragmented datagram? */ hdr->words.word1 = ntohs(hdr->words.word1); @@ -1617,8 +1616,7 @@ static int ether1394_tx(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev) if (!node) goto fail; - node_info = - (struct eth1394_node_info *)node->ud->device.driver_data; + node_info = dev_get_drvdata(&node->ud->device); if (node_info->fifo == CSR1212_INVALID_ADDR_SPACE) goto fail; |