diff options
| author | Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> | 2022-01-06 22:54:26 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> | 2022-01-10 10:33:51 -0500 |
| commit | 7a960b3a5e37f05d7d319bf257a8cf6ee9d18e7c (patch) | |
| tree | 2a727bec0a36c621d88fc6e7313ef844302570a8 /drivers/message | |
| parent | 5c5e6b6f61e0196141db38b84b30ef9b3bcca0f2 (diff) | |
| download | linux-stable-7a960b3a5e37f05d7d319bf257a8cf6ee9d18e7c.tar.gz linux-stable-7a960b3a5e37f05d7d319bf257a8cf6ee9d18e7c.tar.bz2 linux-stable-7a960b3a5e37f05d7d319bf257a8cf6ee9d18e7c.zip | |
scsi: message: fusion: Use dma_alloc_coherent() in mptsas_exp_repmanufacture_info()
In [1], Christoph Hellwig has proposed to remove the wrappers in
include/linux/pci-dma-compat.h.
Some reasons why this API should be removed have been given by Julia Lawall
in [2].
The only caller of mptsas_exp_repmanufacture_info() is
mptsas_probe_one_phy(). This function already calls sas_end_device_alloc()
or sas_expander_alloc(). They both already use GFP_KERNEL.
As no spin_lock is held at this point, it is safe to also use GFP_KERNEL
here.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/kernel-janitors/20200421081257.GA131897@infradead.org/
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/kernel-janitors/alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2007120902170.2424@hadrien/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/d78d4a5b096897932808ed7e3a4540db1687c25d.1641500561.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/message')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/message/fusion/mptsas.c | 3 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/message/fusion/mptsas.c b/drivers/message/fusion/mptsas.c index 0363b2a2264d..9b40be04710c 100644 --- a/drivers/message/fusion/mptsas.c +++ b/drivers/message/fusion/mptsas.c @@ -2896,7 +2896,8 @@ mptsas_exp_repmanufacture_info(MPT_ADAPTER *ioc, sz = sizeof(struct rep_manu_request) + sizeof(struct rep_manu_reply); - data_out = pci_alloc_consistent(ioc->pcidev, sz, &data_out_dma); + data_out = dma_alloc_coherent(&ioc->pcidev->dev, sz, &data_out_dma, + GFP_KERNEL); if (!data_out) { printk(KERN_ERR "Memory allocation failure at %s:%d/%s()!\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, __func__); |