diff options
author | Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> | 2012-09-26 16:15:27 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> | 2012-11-15 15:37:46 +0200 |
commit | 30fad64325ba368ffe1f92bd37f4b96c1fa4da83 (patch) | |
tree | 8ab570d3c44de56308f198b3f0928cf1d1e066fb /drivers/mtd | |
parent | ecbcbc7b75bb1b7596fca2d588d2f7539dc4e581 (diff) | |
download | linux-stable-30fad64325ba368ffe1f92bd37f4b96c1fa4da83.tar.gz linux-stable-30fad64325ba368ffe1f92bd37f4b96c1fa4da83.tar.bz2 linux-stable-30fad64325ba368ffe1f92bd37f4b96c1fa4da83.zip |
mtd: fsl_elbc_nand: remove unnecessary badblock_pattern
Since the introduction of nand_create_default_bbt_descr() (now known as
nand_create_badblock_pattern()) in
commit 58373ff0afff4cc8ac40608872995f4d87eb72ec
nand_chip.badblock_pattern will be dynamically calculated to the same
1-byte-length pattern that is required by fsl_elbc_nand. This custom
badblock_pattern is no longer needed, then, and its removal may help
facilitate further nand_bbt.c/nand_base.c cleanup in the future (one
down, many to go?)
Anyway, with nand_bbt.c fixed, this effectively reverts:
commit 452db2724351ff3d9416a183a7955e00ab4e6ab4
[MTD] [NAND] fsl_elbc_nand: fix OOB workability for large page NAND chips
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/mtd')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c | 15 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 15 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c index cc1480a5e4c1..4c4d3e5bca18 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c @@ -109,20 +109,6 @@ static struct nand_ecclayout fsl_elbc_oob_lp_eccm1 = { }; /* - * fsl_elbc_oob_lp_eccm* specify that LP NAND's OOB free area starts at offset - * 1, so we have to adjust bad block pattern. This pattern should be used for - * x8 chips only. So far hardware does not support x16 chips anyway. - */ -static u8 scan_ff_pattern[] = { 0xff, }; - -static struct nand_bbt_descr largepage_memorybased = { - .options = 0, - .offs = 0, - .len = 1, - .pattern = scan_ff_pattern, -}; - -/* * ELBC may use HW ECC, so that OOB offsets, that NAND core uses for bbt, * interfere with ECC positions, that's why we implement our own descriptors. * OOB {11, 5}, works for both SP and LP chips, with ECCM = 1 and ECCM = 0. @@ -699,7 +685,6 @@ static int fsl_elbc_chip_init_tail(struct mtd_info *mtd) chip->ecc.layout = (priv->fmr & FMR_ECCM) ? &fsl_elbc_oob_lp_eccm1 : &fsl_elbc_oob_lp_eccm0; - chip->badblock_pattern = &largepage_memorybased; } } else { dev_err(priv->dev, |