diff options
author | Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> | 2017-06-20 21:01:20 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> | 2017-06-20 15:42:32 -0400 |
commit | 104b4e5139fe384431ac11c3b8a6cf4a529edf4a (patch) | |
tree | e8a0157f2294f006f31e535949327b3484a5dcb8 /fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | |
parent | df95e795a722892a9e0603ce4b9b62fab9f02967 (diff) | |
download | linux-stable-104b4e5139fe384431ac11c3b8a6cf4a529edf4a.tar.gz linux-stable-104b4e5139fe384431ac11c3b8a6cf4a529edf4a.tar.bz2 linux-stable-104b4e5139fe384431ac11c3b8a6cf4a529edf4a.zip |
percpu_counter: Rename __percpu_counter_add to percpu_counter_add_batch
Currently, percpu_counter_add is a wrapper around __percpu_counter_add
which is preempt safe due to explicit calls to preempt_disable. Given
how __ prefix is used in percpu related interfaces, the naming
unfortunately creates the false sense that __percpu_counter_add is
less safe than percpu_counter_add. In terms of context-safety,
they're equivalent. The only difference is that the __ version takes
a batch parameter.
Make this a bit more explicit by just renaming __percpu_counter_add to
percpu_counter_add_batch.
This patch doesn't cause any functional changes.
tj: Minor updates to patch description for clarity. Cosmetic
indentation updates.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Cc: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/btrfs/disk-io.c')
-rw-r--r-- | fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 12 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c index 061c1d1f774f..eb5c95569300 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c @@ -1255,9 +1255,9 @@ void clean_tree_block(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, btrfs_assert_tree_locked(buf); if (test_and_clear_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_DIRTY, &buf->bflags)) { - __percpu_counter_add(&fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes, - -buf->len, - fs_info->dirty_metadata_batch); + percpu_counter_add_batch(&fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes, + -buf->len, + fs_info->dirty_metadata_batch); /* ugh, clear_extent_buffer_dirty needs to lock the page */ btrfs_set_lock_blocking(buf); clear_extent_buffer_dirty(buf); @@ -4046,9 +4046,9 @@ void btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty(struct extent_buffer *buf) buf->start, transid, fs_info->generation); was_dirty = set_extent_buffer_dirty(buf); if (!was_dirty) - __percpu_counter_add(&fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes, - buf->len, - fs_info->dirty_metadata_batch); + percpu_counter_add_batch(&fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes, + buf->len, + fs_info->dirty_metadata_batch); #ifdef CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_CHECK_INTEGRITY if (btrfs_header_level(buf) == 0 && check_leaf(root, buf)) { btrfs_print_leaf(fs_info, buf); |