summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>2018-06-27 16:38:24 +0300
committerDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>2018-08-06 13:12:55 +0200
commitb0132a3be5daf84116833542717ff5692f51640e (patch)
tree001e55d66b406327b31e8844f3ecd0c86e046c93 /fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
parent07e21c4dad42be8d2a6b8cd0b98cf8e6931e12fd (diff)
downloadlinux-stable-b0132a3be5daf84116833542717ff5692f51640e.tar.gz
linux-stable-b0132a3be5daf84116833542717ff5692f51640e.tar.bz2
linux-stable-b0132a3be5daf84116833542717ff5692f51640e.zip
btrfs: Rename EXTENT_BUFFER_DUMMY to EXTENT_BUFFER_UNMAPPED
EXTENT_BUFFER_DUMMY is an awful name for this flag. Buffers which have this flag set are not in any way dummy. Rather, they are private in the sense that are not mapped and linked to the global buffer tree. This flag has subtle implications to the way free_extent_buffer works for example, as well as controls whether page->mapping->private_lock is held during extent_buffer release. Pages for an unmapped buffer cannot be under io, nor can they be written by a 3rd party so taking the lock is unnecessary. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ EXTENT_BUFFER_UNMAPPED, update changelog ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/btrfs/extent_io.c')
-rw-r--r--fs/btrfs/extent_io.c10
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
index 5ab401f79683..3440053f3599 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
@@ -4649,7 +4649,7 @@ static void btrfs_release_extent_buffer_pages(struct extent_buffer *eb)
{
int i;
int num_pages;
- int mapped = !test_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_DUMMY, &eb->bflags);
+ int mapped = !test_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_UNMAPPED, &eb->bflags);
BUG_ON(extent_buffer_under_io(eb));
@@ -4763,7 +4763,7 @@ struct extent_buffer *btrfs_clone_extent_buffer(struct extent_buffer *src)
}
set_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_UPTODATE, &new->bflags);
- set_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_DUMMY, &new->bflags);
+ set_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_UNMAPPED, &new->bflags);
return new;
}
@@ -4787,7 +4787,7 @@ struct extent_buffer *__alloc_dummy_extent_buffer(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
}
set_extent_buffer_uptodate(eb);
btrfs_set_header_nritems(eb, 0);
- set_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_DUMMY, &eb->bflags);
+ set_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_UNMAPPED, &eb->bflags);
return eb;
err:
@@ -5088,7 +5088,7 @@ static int release_extent_buffer(struct extent_buffer *eb)
/* Should be safe to release our pages at this point */
btrfs_release_extent_buffer_pages(eb);
#ifdef CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_RUN_SANITY_TESTS
- if (unlikely(test_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_DUMMY, &eb->bflags))) {
+ if (unlikely(test_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_UNMAPPED, &eb->bflags))) {
__free_extent_buffer(eb);
return 1;
}
@@ -5119,7 +5119,7 @@ void free_extent_buffer(struct extent_buffer *eb)
spin_lock(&eb->refs_lock);
if (atomic_read(&eb->refs) == 2 &&
- test_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_DUMMY, &eb->bflags))
+ test_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_UNMAPPED, &eb->bflags))
atomic_dec(&eb->refs);
if (atomic_read(&eb->refs) == 2 &&