diff options
author | Maxim Patlasov <MPatlasov@parallels.com> | 2013-10-02 21:38:32 +0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz> | 2013-11-05 10:11:27 +0100 |
commit | 6eaf4782eb09e28dbd13d23b9ce0fb7646daf37e (patch) | |
tree | 10416e984f694f35454238a2b7f1b8f72a214bdb /fs/fuse | |
parent | f6011081f5e290756bd90fe96f1e86d3eac76f77 (diff) | |
download | linux-stable-6eaf4782eb09e28dbd13d23b9ce0fb7646daf37e.tar.gz linux-stable-6eaf4782eb09e28dbd13d23b9ce0fb7646daf37e.tar.bz2 linux-stable-6eaf4782eb09e28dbd13d23b9ce0fb7646daf37e.zip |
fuse: writepages: crop secondary requests
If writeback happens while fuse is in FUSE_NOWRITE condition, the request
will be queued but not processed immediately (see fuse_flush_writepages()).
Until FUSE_NOWRITE becomes relaxed, more writebacks can happen. They will
be queued as "secondary" requests to that first ("primary") request.
Existing implementation crops only primary request. This is not correct
because a subsequent extending write(2) may increase i_size and then
secondary requests won't be cropped properly. The result would be stale
data written to the server to a file offset where zeros must be.
Similar problem may happen if secondary requests are attached to an
in-flight request that was already cropped.
The patch solves the issue by cropping all secondary requests in
fuse_writepage_end(). Thanks to Miklos for idea.
Signed-off-by: Maxim Patlasov <MPatlasov@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/fuse')
-rw-r--r-- | fs/fuse/file.c | 36 |
1 files changed, 31 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/fs/fuse/file.c b/fs/fuse/file.c index 077b03844998..1cb303eba4d0 100644 --- a/fs/fuse/file.c +++ b/fs/fuse/file.c @@ -1436,12 +1436,12 @@ static void fuse_writepage_finish(struct fuse_conn *fc, struct fuse_req *req) } /* Called under fc->lock, may release and reacquire it */ -static void fuse_send_writepage(struct fuse_conn *fc, struct fuse_req *req) +static void fuse_send_writepage(struct fuse_conn *fc, struct fuse_req *req, + loff_t size) __releases(fc->lock) __acquires(fc->lock) { struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(req->inode); - loff_t size = i_size_read(req->inode); struct fuse_write_in *inarg = &req->misc.write.in; __u64 data_size = req->num_pages * PAGE_CACHE_SIZE; @@ -1482,12 +1482,13 @@ __acquires(fc->lock) { struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(inode); struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(inode); + size_t crop = i_size_read(inode); struct fuse_req *req; while (fi->writectr >= 0 && !list_empty(&fi->queued_writes)) { req = list_entry(fi->queued_writes.next, struct fuse_req, list); list_del_init(&req->list); - fuse_send_writepage(fc, req); + fuse_send_writepage(fc, req, crop); } } @@ -1499,12 +1500,37 @@ static void fuse_writepage_end(struct fuse_conn *fc, struct fuse_req *req) mapping_set_error(inode->i_mapping, req->out.h.error); spin_lock(&fc->lock); while (req->misc.write.next) { + struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(inode); + struct fuse_write_in *inarg = &req->misc.write.in; struct fuse_req *next = req->misc.write.next; req->misc.write.next = next->misc.write.next; next->misc.write.next = NULL; list_add(&next->writepages_entry, &fi->writepages); - list_add_tail(&next->list, &fi->queued_writes); - fuse_flush_writepages(inode); + + /* + * Skip fuse_flush_writepages() to make it easy to crop requests + * based on primary request size. + * + * 1st case (trivial): there are no concurrent activities using + * fuse_set/release_nowrite. Then we're on safe side because + * fuse_flush_writepages() would call fuse_send_writepage() + * anyway. + * + * 2nd case: someone called fuse_set_nowrite and it is waiting + * now for completion of all in-flight requests. This happens + * rarely and no more than once per page, so this should be + * okay. + * + * 3rd case: someone (e.g. fuse_do_setattr()) is in the middle + * of fuse_set_nowrite..fuse_release_nowrite section. The fact + * that fuse_set_nowrite returned implies that all in-flight + * requests were completed along with all of their secondary + * requests. Further primary requests are blocked by negative + * writectr. Hence there cannot be any in-flight requests and + * no invocations of fuse_writepage_end() while we're in + * fuse_set_nowrite..fuse_release_nowrite section. + */ + fuse_send_writepage(fc, next, inarg->offset + inarg->size); } fi->writectr--; fuse_writepage_finish(fc, req); |