diff options
author | Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> | 2012-06-12 16:20:34 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> | 2012-07-31 09:30:13 +0400 |
commit | 5accdf82ba25cacefd6c1867f1704beb4d244cdd (patch) | |
tree | 7125b01d9bf0f23d5c5eaed0cbafa9a1cbe544d5 /fs/super.c | |
parent | d87aae2f3c8e90bd0fe03f5309b4d066b712b8ec (diff) | |
download | linux-stable-5accdf82ba25cacefd6c1867f1704beb4d244cdd.tar.gz linux-stable-5accdf82ba25cacefd6c1867f1704beb4d244cdd.tar.bz2 linux-stable-5accdf82ba25cacefd6c1867f1704beb4d244cdd.zip |
fs: Improve filesystem freezing handling
vfs_check_frozen() tests are racy since the filesystem can be frozen just after
the test is performed. Thus in write paths we can end up marking some pages or
inodes dirty even though the file system is already frozen. This creates
problems with flusher thread hanging on frozen filesystem.
Another problem is that exclusion between ->page_mkwrite() and filesystem
freezing has been handled by setting page dirty and then verifying s_frozen.
This guaranteed that either the freezing code sees the faulted page, writes it,
and writeprotects it again or we see s_frozen set and bail out of page fault.
This works to protect from page being marked writeable while filesystem
freezing is running but has an unpleasant artefact of leaving dirty (although
unmodified and writeprotected) pages on frozen filesystem resulting in similar
problems with flusher thread as the first problem.
This patch aims at providing exclusion between write paths and filesystem
freezing. We implement a writer-freeze read-write semaphore in the superblock.
Actually, there are three such semaphores because of lock ranking reasons - one
for page fault handlers (->page_mkwrite), one for all other writers, and one of
internal filesystem purposes (used e.g. to track running transactions). Write
paths which should block freezing (e.g. directory operations, ->aio_write(),
->page_mkwrite) hold reader side of the semaphore. Code freezing the filesystem
takes the writer side.
Only that we don't really want to bounce cachelines of the semaphores between
CPUs for each write happening. So we implement the reader side of the semaphore
as a per-cpu counter and the writer side is implemented using s_writers.frozen
superblock field.
[AV: microoptimize sb_start_write(); we want it fast in normal case]
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/897421
Tested-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@canonical.com>
Tested-by: Peter M. Petrakis <peter.petrakis@canonical.com>
Tested-by: Dann Frazier <dann.frazier@canonical.com>
Tested-by: Massimo Morana <massimo.morana@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/super.c')
-rw-r--r-- | fs/super.c | 251 |
1 files changed, 230 insertions, 21 deletions
diff --git a/fs/super.c b/fs/super.c index c743fb3be4b8..0f64ecb7b1bf 100644 --- a/fs/super.c +++ b/fs/super.c @@ -33,12 +33,19 @@ #include <linux/rculist_bl.h> #include <linux/cleancache.h> #include <linux/fsnotify.h> +#include <linux/lockdep.h> #include "internal.h" LIST_HEAD(super_blocks); DEFINE_SPINLOCK(sb_lock); +static char *sb_writers_name[SB_FREEZE_LEVELS] = { + "sb_writers", + "sb_pagefaults", + "sb_internal", +}; + /* * One thing we have to be careful of with a per-sb shrinker is that we don't * drop the last active reference to the superblock from within the shrinker. @@ -102,6 +109,35 @@ static int prune_super(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc) return total_objects; } +static int init_sb_writers(struct super_block *s, struct file_system_type *type) +{ + int err; + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < SB_FREEZE_LEVELS; i++) { + err = percpu_counter_init(&s->s_writers.counter[i], 0); + if (err < 0) + goto err_out; + lockdep_init_map(&s->s_writers.lock_map[i], sb_writers_name[i], + &type->s_writers_key[i], 0); + } + init_waitqueue_head(&s->s_writers.wait); + init_waitqueue_head(&s->s_writers.wait_unfrozen); + return 0; +err_out: + while (--i >= 0) + percpu_counter_destroy(&s->s_writers.counter[i]); + return err; +} + +static void destroy_sb_writers(struct super_block *s) +{ + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < SB_FREEZE_LEVELS; i++) + percpu_counter_destroy(&s->s_writers.counter[i]); +} + /** * alloc_super - create new superblock * @type: filesystem type superblock should belong to @@ -117,18 +153,19 @@ static struct super_block *alloc_super(struct file_system_type *type, int flags) if (s) { if (security_sb_alloc(s)) { + /* + * We cannot call security_sb_free() without + * security_sb_alloc() succeeding. So bail out manually + */ kfree(s); s = NULL; goto out; } #ifdef CONFIG_SMP s->s_files = alloc_percpu(struct list_head); - if (!s->s_files) { - security_sb_free(s); - kfree(s); - s = NULL; - goto out; - } else { + if (!s->s_files) + goto err_out; + else { int i; for_each_possible_cpu(i) @@ -137,6 +174,8 @@ static struct super_block *alloc_super(struct file_system_type *type, int flags) #else INIT_LIST_HEAD(&s->s_files); #endif + if (init_sb_writers(s, type)) + goto err_out; s->s_flags = flags; s->s_bdi = &default_backing_dev_info; INIT_HLIST_NODE(&s->s_instances); @@ -190,6 +229,16 @@ static struct super_block *alloc_super(struct file_system_type *type, int flags) } out: return s; +err_out: + security_sb_free(s); +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP + if (s->s_files) + free_percpu(s->s_files); +#endif + destroy_sb_writers(s); + kfree(s); + s = NULL; + goto out; } /** @@ -203,6 +252,7 @@ static inline void destroy_super(struct super_block *s) #ifdef CONFIG_SMP free_percpu(s->s_files); #endif + destroy_sb_writers(s); security_sb_free(s); WARN_ON(!list_empty(&s->s_mounts)); kfree(s->s_subtype); @@ -651,10 +701,11 @@ struct super_block *get_super_thawed(struct block_device *bdev) { while (1) { struct super_block *s = get_super(bdev); - if (!s || s->s_frozen == SB_UNFROZEN) + if (!s || s->s_writers.frozen == SB_UNFROZEN) return s; up_read(&s->s_umount); - vfs_check_frozen(s, SB_FREEZE_WRITE); + wait_event(s->s_writers.wait_unfrozen, + s->s_writers.frozen == SB_UNFROZEN); put_super(s); } } @@ -732,7 +783,7 @@ int do_remount_sb(struct super_block *sb, int flags, void *data, int force) int retval; int remount_ro; - if (sb->s_frozen != SB_UNFROZEN) + if (sb->s_writers.frozen != SB_UNFROZEN) return -EBUSY; #ifdef CONFIG_BLOCK @@ -1163,6 +1214,120 @@ out: return ERR_PTR(error); } +/* + * This is an internal function, please use sb_end_{write,pagefault,intwrite} + * instead. + */ +void __sb_end_write(struct super_block *sb, int level) +{ + percpu_counter_dec(&sb->s_writers.counter[level-1]); + /* + * Make sure s_writers are updated before we wake up waiters in + * freeze_super(). + */ + smp_mb(); + if (waitqueue_active(&sb->s_writers.wait)) + wake_up(&sb->s_writers.wait); + rwsem_release(&sb->s_writers.lock_map[level-1], 1, _RET_IP_); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__sb_end_write); + +#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP +/* + * We want lockdep to tell us about possible deadlocks with freezing but + * it's it bit tricky to properly instrument it. Getting a freeze protection + * works as getting a read lock but there are subtle problems. XFS for example + * gets freeze protection on internal level twice in some cases, which is OK + * only because we already hold a freeze protection also on higher level. Due + * to these cases we have to tell lockdep we are doing trylock when we + * already hold a freeze protection for a higher freeze level. + */ +static void acquire_freeze_lock(struct super_block *sb, int level, bool trylock, + unsigned long ip) +{ + int i; + + if (!trylock) { + for (i = 0; i < level - 1; i++) + if (lock_is_held(&sb->s_writers.lock_map[i])) { + trylock = true; + break; + } + } + rwsem_acquire_read(&sb->s_writers.lock_map[level-1], 0, trylock, ip); +} +#endif + +/* + * This is an internal function, please use sb_start_{write,pagefault,intwrite} + * instead. + */ +int __sb_start_write(struct super_block *sb, int level, bool wait) +{ +retry: + if (unlikely(sb->s_writers.frozen >= level)) { + if (!wait) + return 0; + wait_event(sb->s_writers.wait_unfrozen, + sb->s_writers.frozen < level); + } + +#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP + acquire_freeze_lock(sb, level, !wait, _RET_IP_); +#endif + percpu_counter_inc(&sb->s_writers.counter[level-1]); + /* + * Make sure counter is updated before we check for frozen. + * freeze_super() first sets frozen and then checks the counter. + */ + smp_mb(); + if (unlikely(sb->s_writers.frozen >= level)) { + __sb_end_write(sb, level); + goto retry; + } + return 1; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__sb_start_write); + +/** + * sb_wait_write - wait until all writers to given file system finish + * @sb: the super for which we wait + * @level: type of writers we wait for (normal vs page fault) + * + * This function waits until there are no writers of given type to given file + * system. Caller of this function should make sure there can be no new writers + * of type @level before calling this function. Otherwise this function can + * livelock. + */ +static void sb_wait_write(struct super_block *sb, int level) +{ + s64 writers; + + /* + * We just cycle-through lockdep here so that it does not complain + * about returning with lock to userspace + */ + rwsem_acquire(&sb->s_writers.lock_map[level-1], 0, 0, _THIS_IP_); + rwsem_release(&sb->s_writers.lock_map[level-1], 1, _THIS_IP_); + + do { + DEFINE_WAIT(wait); + + /* + * We use a barrier in prepare_to_wait() to separate setting + * of frozen and checking of the counter + */ + prepare_to_wait(&sb->s_writers.wait, &wait, + TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); + + writers = percpu_counter_sum(&sb->s_writers.counter[level-1]); + if (writers) + schedule(); + + finish_wait(&sb->s_writers.wait, &wait); + } while (writers); +} + /** * freeze_super - lock the filesystem and force it into a consistent state * @sb: the super to lock @@ -1170,6 +1335,31 @@ out: * Syncs the super to make sure the filesystem is consistent and calls the fs's * freeze_fs. Subsequent calls to this without first thawing the fs will return * -EBUSY. + * + * During this function, sb->s_writers.frozen goes through these values: + * + * SB_UNFROZEN: File system is normal, all writes progress as usual. + * + * SB_FREEZE_WRITE: The file system is in the process of being frozen. New + * writes should be blocked, though page faults are still allowed. We wait for + * all writes to complete and then proceed to the next stage. + * + * SB_FREEZE_PAGEFAULT: Freezing continues. Now also page faults are blocked + * but internal fs threads can still modify the filesystem (although they + * should not dirty new pages or inodes), writeback can run etc. After waiting + * for all running page faults we sync the filesystem which will clean all + * dirty pages and inodes (no new dirty pages or inodes can be created when + * sync is running). + * + * SB_FREEZE_FS: The file system is frozen. Now all internal sources of fs + * modification are blocked (e.g. XFS preallocation truncation on inode + * reclaim). This is usually implemented by blocking new transactions for + * filesystems that have them and need this additional guard. After all + * internal writers are finished we call ->freeze_fs() to finish filesystem + * freezing. Then we transition to SB_FREEZE_COMPLETE state. This state is + * mostly auxiliary for filesystems to verify they do not modify frozen fs. + * + * sb->s_writers.frozen is protected by sb->s_umount. */ int freeze_super(struct super_block *sb) { @@ -1177,7 +1367,7 @@ int freeze_super(struct super_block *sb) atomic_inc(&sb->s_active); down_write(&sb->s_umount); - if (sb->s_frozen) { + if (sb->s_writers.frozen != SB_UNFROZEN) { deactivate_locked_super(sb); return -EBUSY; } @@ -1188,33 +1378,53 @@ int freeze_super(struct super_block *sb) } if (sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY) { - sb->s_frozen = SB_FREEZE_TRANS; - smp_wmb(); + /* Nothing to do really... */ + sb->s_writers.frozen = SB_FREEZE_COMPLETE; up_write(&sb->s_umount); return 0; } - sb->s_frozen = SB_FREEZE_WRITE; + /* From now on, no new normal writers can start */ + sb->s_writers.frozen = SB_FREEZE_WRITE; + smp_wmb(); + + /* Release s_umount to preserve sb_start_write -> s_umount ordering */ + up_write(&sb->s_umount); + + sb_wait_write(sb, SB_FREEZE_WRITE); + + /* Now we go and block page faults... */ + down_write(&sb->s_umount); + sb->s_writers.frozen = SB_FREEZE_PAGEFAULT; smp_wmb(); + sb_wait_write(sb, SB_FREEZE_PAGEFAULT); + + /* All writers are done so after syncing there won't be dirty data */ sync_filesystem(sb); - sb->s_frozen = SB_FREEZE_TRANS; + /* Now wait for internal filesystem counter */ + sb->s_writers.frozen = SB_FREEZE_FS; smp_wmb(); + sb_wait_write(sb, SB_FREEZE_FS); - sync_blockdev(sb->s_bdev); if (sb->s_op->freeze_fs) { ret = sb->s_op->freeze_fs(sb); if (ret) { printk(KERN_ERR "VFS:Filesystem freeze failed\n"); - sb->s_frozen = SB_UNFROZEN; + sb->s_writers.frozen = SB_UNFROZEN; smp_wmb(); - wake_up(&sb->s_wait_unfrozen); + wake_up(&sb->s_writers.wait_unfrozen); deactivate_locked_super(sb); return ret; } } + /* + * This is just for debugging purposes so that fs can warn if it + * sees write activity when frozen is set to SB_FREEZE_COMPLETE. + */ + sb->s_writers.frozen = SB_FREEZE_COMPLETE; up_write(&sb->s_umount); return 0; } @@ -1231,7 +1441,7 @@ int thaw_super(struct super_block *sb) int error; down_write(&sb->s_umount); - if (sb->s_frozen == SB_UNFROZEN) { + if (sb->s_writers.frozen == SB_UNFROZEN) { up_write(&sb->s_umount); return -EINVAL; } @@ -1244,16 +1454,15 @@ int thaw_super(struct super_block *sb) if (error) { printk(KERN_ERR "VFS:Filesystem thaw failed\n"); - sb->s_frozen = SB_FREEZE_TRANS; up_write(&sb->s_umount); return error; } } out: - sb->s_frozen = SB_UNFROZEN; + sb->s_writers.frozen = SB_UNFROZEN; smp_wmb(); - wake_up(&sb->s_wait_unfrozen); + wake_up(&sb->s_writers.wait_unfrozen); deactivate_locked_super(sb); return 0; |