diff options
| author | Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omp.ru> | 2023-11-05 23:29:36 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | 2024-01-25 14:33:32 -0800 |
| commit | 3b333cded94fbe5ce30d699b316c4715151268ae (patch) | |
| tree | e972e2d0de3077a0ca1aab0f444d2c7c457b8c15 /fs | |
| parent | 71ba0d44a741640a962d4a6092afc84e976379bc (diff) | |
| download | linux-stable-3b333cded94fbe5ce30d699b316c4715151268ae.tar.gz linux-stable-3b333cded94fbe5ce30d699b316c4715151268ae.tar.bz2 linux-stable-3b333cded94fbe5ce30d699b316c4715151268ae.zip | |
pstore: ram_core: fix possible overflow in persistent_ram_init_ecc()
[ Upstream commit 86222a8fc16ec517de8da2604d904c9df3a08e5d ]
In persistent_ram_init_ecc(), on 64-bit arches DIV_ROUND_UP() will return
64-bit value since persistent_ram_zone::buffer_size has type size_t which
is derived from the 64-bit *unsigned long*, while the ecc_blocks variable
this value gets assigned to has (always 32-bit) *int* type. Even if that
value fits into *int* type, an overflow is still possible when calculating
the size_t typed ecc_total variable further below since there's no cast to
any 64-bit type before multiplication. Declaring the ecc_blocks variable
as *size_t* should fix this mess...
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with the SVACE static
analysis tool.
Fixes: 9cc05ad97c57 ("staging: android: persistent_ram: refactor ecc support")
Signed-off-by: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omp.ru>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231105202936.25694-1-s.shtylyov@omp.ru
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs')
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/pstore/ram_core.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/fs/pstore/ram_core.c b/fs/pstore/ram_core.c index efb765b8466f..a6e5022469ab 100644 --- a/fs/pstore/ram_core.c +++ b/fs/pstore/ram_core.c @@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ static int persistent_ram_init_ecc(struct persistent_ram_zone *prz, { int numerr; struct persistent_ram_buffer *buffer = prz->buffer; - int ecc_blocks; + size_t ecc_blocks; size_t ecc_total; if (!ecc_info || !ecc_info->ecc_size) |