diff options
| author | Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> | 2015-04-03 09:04:04 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> | 2015-04-03 09:04:04 -0400 |
| commit | 3648888e90bb7fe6d0586ec177511e6678ee22c3 (patch) | |
| tree | 8f23ef5421f8ace7d3a1e8bcc07be92ac03b4c25 /fs | |
| parent | cae80b305e1c3944746dd93e33e9b2ccd5a490c1 (diff) | |
| download | linux-stable-3648888e90bb7fe6d0586ec177511e6678ee22c3.tar.gz linux-stable-3648888e90bb7fe6d0586ec177511e6678ee22c3.tar.bz2 linux-stable-3648888e90bb7fe6d0586ec177511e6678ee22c3.zip | |
locks: get rid of WE_CAN_BREAK_LSLK_NOW dead code
As Bruce points out, there's no compelling reason to change /proc/locks
output at this point. If we did want to do this, then we'd almost
certainly want to introduce a new file to display this info (maybe via
debugfs?).
Let's remove the dead WE_CAN_BREAK_LSLK_NOW ifdef here and just plan to
stay with the legacy format.
Reported-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs')
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/locks.c | 7 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c index 3ebaafb4c587..16cae1a00851 100644 --- a/fs/locks.c +++ b/fs/locks.c @@ -2565,15 +2565,10 @@ static void lock_get_status(struct seq_file *f, struct file_lock *fl, : (fl->fl_type == F_WRLCK) ? "WRITE" : "READ "); } if (inode) { -#ifdef WE_CAN_BREAK_LSLK_NOW - seq_printf(f, "%d %s:%ld ", fl_pid, - inode->i_sb->s_id, inode->i_ino); -#else - /* userspace relies on this representation of dev_t ;-( */ + /* userspace relies on this representation of dev_t */ seq_printf(f, "%d %02x:%02x:%ld ", fl_pid, MAJOR(inode->i_sb->s_dev), MINOR(inode->i_sb->s_dev), inode->i_ino); -#endif } else { seq_printf(f, "%d <none>:0 ", fl_pid); } |