diff options
author | Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com> | 2008-04-29 01:03:30 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2008-04-29 08:06:27 -0700 |
commit | 6510d41954dc6a9c8b1dbca7eaca0f23195ca727 (patch) | |
tree | 868b5fac25c7c5b80cc5a88eaaab8bf3d693420d /include/asm-mn10300 | |
parent | 064106a91be5e76cb42c1ddf5d3871e3a1bd2a23 (diff) | |
download | linux-stable-6510d41954dc6a9c8b1dbca7eaca0f23195ca727.tar.gz linux-stable-6510d41954dc6a9c8b1dbca7eaca0f23195ca727.tar.bz2 linux-stable-6510d41954dc6a9c8b1dbca7eaca0f23195ca727.zip |
kernel: Move arches to use common unaligned access
Unaligned access is ok for the following arches:
cris, m68k, mn10300, powerpc, s390, x86
Arches that use the memmove implementation for native endian, and
the byteshifting for the opposite endianness.
h8300, m32r, xtensa
Packed struct for native endian, byteshifting for other endian:
alpha, blackfin, ia64, parisc, sparc, sparc64, mips, sh
m86knommu is generic_be for Coldfire, otherwise unaligned access is ok.
frv, arm chooses endianness based on compiler settings, uses the byteshifting
versions. Remove the unaligned trap handler from frv as it is now unused.
v850 is le, uses the byteshifting versions for both be and le.
Remove the now unused asm-generic implementation.
Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/asm-mn10300')
-rw-r--r-- | include/asm-mn10300/unaligned.h | 130 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 123 deletions
diff --git a/include/asm-mn10300/unaligned.h b/include/asm-mn10300/unaligned.h index cad3afbd035f..0df671318ae4 100644 --- a/include/asm-mn10300/unaligned.h +++ b/include/asm-mn10300/unaligned.h @@ -8,129 +8,13 @@ * as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version * 2 of the Licence, or (at your option) any later version. */ -#ifndef _ASM_UNALIGNED_H -#define _ASM_UNALIGNED_H +#ifndef _ASM_MN10300_UNALIGNED_H +#define _ASM_MN10300_UNALIGNED_H -#include <asm/types.h> +#include <linux/unaligned/access_ok.h> +#include <linux/unaligned/generic.h> -#if 0 -extern int __bug_unaligned_x(void *ptr); +#define get_unaligned __get_unaligned_le +#define put_unaligned __put_unaligned_le -/* - * What is the most efficient way of loading/storing an unaligned value? - * - * That is the subject of this file. Efficiency here is defined as - * minimum code size with minimum register usage for the common cases. - * It is currently not believed that long longs are common, so we - * trade efficiency for the chars, shorts and longs against the long - * longs. - * - * Current stats with gcc 2.7.2.2 for these functions: - * - * ptrsize get: code regs put: code regs - * 1 1 1 1 2 - * 2 3 2 3 2 - * 4 7 3 7 3 - * 8 20 6 16 6 - * - * gcc 2.95.1 seems to code differently: - * - * ptrsize get: code regs put: code regs - * 1 1 1 1 2 - * 2 3 2 3 2 - * 4 7 4 7 4 - * 8 19 8 15 6 - * - * which may or may not be more efficient (depending upon whether - * you can afford the extra registers). Hopefully the gcc 2.95 - * is inteligent enough to decide if it is better to use the - * extra register, but evidence so far seems to suggest otherwise. - * - * Unfortunately, gcc is not able to optimise the high word - * out of long long >> 32, or the low word from long long << 32 - */ - -#define __get_unaligned_2(__p) \ - (__p[0] | __p[1] << 8) - -#define __get_unaligned_4(__p) \ - (__p[0] | __p[1] << 8 | __p[2] << 16 | __p[3] << 24) - -#define get_unaligned(ptr) \ -({ \ - unsigned int __v1, __v2; \ - __typeof__(*(ptr)) __v; \ - __u8 *__p = (__u8 *)(ptr); \ - \ - switch (sizeof(*(ptr))) { \ - case 1: __v = *(ptr); break; \ - case 2: __v = __get_unaligned_2(__p); break; \ - case 4: __v = __get_unaligned_4(__p); break; \ - case 8: \ - __v2 = __get_unaligned_4((__p+4)); \ - __v1 = __get_unaligned_4(__p); \ - __v = ((unsigned long long)__v2 << 32 | __v1); \ - break; \ - default: __v = __bug_unaligned_x(__p); break; \ - } \ - __v; \ -}) - - -static inline void __put_unaligned_2(__u32 __v, register __u8 *__p) -{ - *__p++ = __v; - *__p++ = __v >> 8; -} - -static inline void __put_unaligned_4(__u32 __v, register __u8 *__p) -{ - __put_unaligned_2(__v >> 16, __p + 2); - __put_unaligned_2(__v, __p); -} - -static inline void __put_unaligned_8(const unsigned long long __v, __u8 *__p) -{ - /* - * tradeoff: 8 bytes of stack for all unaligned puts (2 - * instructions), or an extra register in the long long - * case - go for the extra register. - */ - __put_unaligned_4(__v >> 32, __p + 4); - __put_unaligned_4(__v, __p); -} - -/* - * Try to store an unaligned value as efficiently as possible. - */ -#define put_unaligned(val, ptr) \ - ({ \ - switch (sizeof(*(ptr))) { \ - case 1: \ - *(ptr) = (val); \ - break; \ - case 2: \ - __put_unaligned_2((val), (__u8 *)(ptr)); \ - break; \ - case 4: \ - __put_unaligned_4((val), (__u8 *)(ptr)); \ - break; \ - case 8: \ - __put_unaligned_8((val), (__u8 *)(ptr)); \ - break; \ - default: \ - __bug_unaligned_x(ptr); \ - break; \ - } \ - (void) 0; \ - }) - - -#else - -#define get_unaligned(ptr) (*(ptr)) -#define put_unaligned(val, ptr) ({ *(ptr) = (val); (void) 0; }) - -#endif - -#endif +#endif /* _ASM_MN10300_UNALIGNED_H */ |