diff options
| author | Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org> | 2012-12-29 21:51:20 -0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> | 2013-03-26 08:04:54 -0700 |
| commit | bd9f0686fc8c9a01c6850b1c611d1c9ad80b86d6 (patch) | |
| tree | 9e19e1d9b746ee000864e42b50b49dbed89f946a /include/trace | |
| parent | b92db6cb7efcbd41e469e1d757c47da4865f7622 (diff) | |
| download | linux-stable-bd9f0686fc8c9a01c6850b1c611d1c9ad80b86d6.tar.gz linux-stable-bd9f0686fc8c9a01c6850b1c611d1c9ad80b86d6.tar.bz2 linux-stable-bd9f0686fc8c9a01c6850b1c611d1c9ad80b86d6.zip | |
rcu: Repurpose no-CBs event tracing to future-GP events
Dyntick-idle CPUs need to be able to pre-announce their need for grace
periods. This can be done using something similar to the mechanism used
by no-CB CPUs to announce their need for grace periods. This commit
moves in this direction by renaming the no-CBs grace-period event tracing
to suit the new future-grace-period needs.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/trace')
| -rw-r--r-- | include/trace/events/rcu.h | 16 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/include/trace/events/rcu.h b/include/trace/events/rcu.h index cdfed6d386eb..59ebcc89f148 100644 --- a/include/trace/events/rcu.h +++ b/include/trace/events/rcu.h @@ -72,10 +72,10 @@ TRACE_EVENT(rcu_grace_period, ); /* - * Tracepoint for no-callbacks grace-period events. The caller should - * pull the data from the rcu_node structure, other than rcuname, which - * comes from the rcu_state structure, and event, which is one of the - * following: + * Tracepoint for future grace-period events, including those for no-callbacks + * CPUs. The caller should pull the data from the rcu_node structure, + * other than rcuname, which comes from the rcu_state structure, and event, + * which is one of the following: * * "Startleaf": Request a nocb grace period based on leaf-node data. * "Startedleaf": Leaf-node start proved sufficient. @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(rcu_grace_period, * "Cleanup": Clean up rcu_node structure after previous GP. * "CleanupMore": Clean up, and another no-CB GP is needed. */ -TRACE_EVENT(rcu_nocb_grace_period, +TRACE_EVENT(rcu_future_grace_period, TP_PROTO(char *rcuname, unsigned long gpnum, unsigned long completed, unsigned long c, u8 level, int grplo, int grphi, @@ -653,9 +653,9 @@ TRACE_EVENT(rcu_barrier, #define trace_rcu_grace_period(rcuname, gpnum, gpevent) do { } while (0) #define trace_rcu_grace_period_init(rcuname, gpnum, level, grplo, grphi, \ qsmask) do { } while (0) -#define trace_rcu_nocb_grace_period(rcuname, gpnum, completed, c, \ - level, grplo, grphi, event) \ - do { } while (0) +#define trace_rcu_future_grace_period(rcuname, gpnum, completed, c, \ + level, grplo, grphi, event) \ + do { } while (0) #define trace_rcu_preempt_task(rcuname, pid, gpnum) do { } while (0) #define trace_rcu_unlock_preempted_task(rcuname, gpnum, pid) do { } while (0) #define trace_rcu_quiescent_state_report(rcuname, gpnum, mask, qsmask, level, \ |