diff options
author | Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> | 2009-12-15 16:47:30 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2009-12-16 07:20:09 -0800 |
commit | d4212093dca95c1f52197017d969cc66d5d962aa (patch) | |
tree | f52484ae3c7b3034715b5745ae2b7db3906ab022 /ipc | |
parent | 9cad200c7686708b326520a45dd680a4147568a6 (diff) | |
download | linux-stable-d4212093dca95c1f52197017d969cc66d5d962aa.tar.gz linux-stable-d4212093dca95c1f52197017d969cc66d5d962aa.tar.bz2 linux-stable-d4212093dca95c1f52197017d969cc66d5d962aa.zip |
ipc/sem.c: sem preempt improve
The strange sysv semaphore wakeup scheme has a kind of busy-wait lock
involved, which could deadlock if preemption is enabled during the "lock".
It is an implementation detail (due to a spinlock being held) that this is
actually the case. However if "spinlocks" are made preemptible, or if the
sem lock is changed to a sleeping lock for example, then the wakeup would
become buggy. So this might be a bugfix for -rt kernels.
Imagine waker being preempted by wakee and never clearing IN_WAKEUP -- if
wakee has higher RT priority then there is a priority inversion deadlock.
Even if there is not a priority inversion to cause a deadlock, then there
is still time wasted spinning.
Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
Cc: Pierre Peiffer <peifferp@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'ipc')
-rw-r--r-- | ipc/sem.c | 38 |
1 files changed, 23 insertions, 15 deletions
diff --git a/ipc/sem.c b/ipc/sem.c index d377b3adfc3d..2705fbbc4374 100644 --- a/ipc/sem.c +++ b/ipc/sem.c @@ -398,6 +398,27 @@ undo: return result; } +/* + * Wake up a process waiting on the sem queue with a given error. + * The queue is invalid (may not be accessed) after the function returns. + */ +static void wake_up_sem_queue(struct sem_queue *q, int error) +{ + /* + * Hold preempt off so that we don't get preempted and have the + * wakee busy-wait until we're scheduled back on. We're holding + * locks here so it may not strictly be needed, however if the + * locks become preemptible then this prevents such a problem. + */ + preempt_disable(); + q->status = IN_WAKEUP; + wake_up_process(q->sleeper); + /* hands-off: q can disappear immediately after writing q->status. */ + smp_wmb(); + q->status = error; + preempt_enable(); +} + /* Go through the pending queue for the indicated semaphore * looking for tasks that can be completed. */ @@ -429,17 +450,7 @@ again: * continue. */ alter = q->alter; - - /* wake up the waiting thread */ - q->status = IN_WAKEUP; - - wake_up_process(q->sleeper); - /* hands-off: q will disappear immediately after - * writing q->status. - */ - smp_wmb(); - q->status = error; - + wake_up_sem_queue(q, error); if (alter) goto again; } @@ -523,10 +534,7 @@ static void freeary(struct ipc_namespace *ns, struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp) list_for_each_entry_safe(q, tq, &sma->sem_pending, list) { list_del(&q->list); - q->status = IN_WAKEUP; - wake_up_process(q->sleeper); /* doesn't sleep */ - smp_wmb(); - q->status = -EIDRM; /* hands-off q */ + wake_up_sem_queue(q, -EIDRM); } /* Remove the semaphore set from the IDR */ |