diff options
| author | Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> | 2018-06-05 11:45:07 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> | 2018-06-19 10:39:54 -0400 |
| commit | d904ac0320d3c4ff4e9d80e4294ca5dde803696f (patch) | |
| tree | 3f504b3d96ce50dd4c9aa6724aa784c6f4c852a9 /kernel/auditfilter.c | |
| parent | af85d1772e31fed34165a1b3decef340cf4080c0 (diff) | |
| download | linux-stable-d904ac0320d3c4ff4e9d80e4294ca5dde803696f.tar.gz linux-stable-d904ac0320d3c4ff4e9d80e4294ca5dde803696f.tar.bz2 linux-stable-d904ac0320d3c4ff4e9d80e4294ca5dde803696f.zip | |
audit: rename FILTER_TYPE to FILTER_EXCLUDE
The AUDIT_FILTER_TYPE name is vague and misleading due to not describing
where or when the filter is applied and obsolete due to its available
filter fields having been expanded.
Userspace has already renamed it from AUDIT_FILTER_TYPE to
AUDIT_FILTER_EXCLUDE without checking if it already exists. The
userspace maintainer assures that as long as it is set to the same value
it will not be a problem since the userspace code does not treat
compiler warnings as errors. If this policy changes then checks if it
already exists can be added at the same time.
See: https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-kernel/issues/89
Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/auditfilter.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/auditfilter.c | 10 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/auditfilter.c b/kernel/auditfilter.c index 6db9847ca031..bf309f2592c4 100644 --- a/kernel/auditfilter.c +++ b/kernel/auditfilter.c @@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ static inline struct audit_entry *audit_to_entry_common(struct audit_rule_data * case AUDIT_FILTER_TASK: #endif case AUDIT_FILTER_USER: - case AUDIT_FILTER_TYPE: + case AUDIT_FILTER_EXCLUDE: case AUDIT_FILTER_FS: ; } @@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ static int audit_field_valid(struct audit_entry *entry, struct audit_field *f) { switch(f->type) { case AUDIT_MSGTYPE: - if (entry->rule.listnr != AUDIT_FILTER_TYPE && + if (entry->rule.listnr != AUDIT_FILTER_EXCLUDE && entry->rule.listnr != AUDIT_FILTER_USER) return -EINVAL; break; @@ -929,7 +929,7 @@ static inline int audit_add_rule(struct audit_entry *entry) /* If any of these, don't count towards total */ switch(entry->rule.listnr) { case AUDIT_FILTER_USER: - case AUDIT_FILTER_TYPE: + case AUDIT_FILTER_EXCLUDE: case AUDIT_FILTER_FS: dont_count = 1; } @@ -1011,7 +1011,7 @@ int audit_del_rule(struct audit_entry *entry) /* If any of these, don't count towards total */ switch(entry->rule.listnr) { case AUDIT_FILTER_USER: - case AUDIT_FILTER_TYPE: + case AUDIT_FILTER_EXCLUDE: case AUDIT_FILTER_FS: dont_count = 1; } @@ -1372,7 +1372,7 @@ int audit_filter(int msgtype, unsigned int listtype) break; } if (result > 0) { - if (e->rule.action == AUDIT_NEVER || listtype == AUDIT_FILTER_TYPE) + if (e->rule.action == AUDIT_NEVER || listtype == AUDIT_FILTER_EXCLUDE) ret = 0; break; } |